The Influence of E-Service Quality, Perceived Risk, and Customer Trust on Repurchase Intention (A Study on E-Commerce Tiktok Shop Users in Indonesia)
1Vidia Anugerah Ayu Tavia Ferrial,2Mahrinasari,3Yuniarti Fihartini
1,2,3Master of Management University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i12-40ABSTRACT:
Changes in the use of information media in commerce have driven a shift from conventional trading techniques to electronic commerce, facilitating online transactions and creating intense competition among retailers, especially with the increasing number of e-commerce sites in Indonesia. TikTok Shop is an e-commerce platform that offers an interactive shopping experience, allowing brands to sell directly through the TikTok app using short video content or live shopping, often with the help of celebrities or influencers to promote products. TikTok Shop's efforts to maintain consumer repurchase intention are influenced by various factors, such as e-service quality, perceived risk, and customer trust. This study aims to determine the influence of these factors on repurchase intention in TikTok Shop Indonesia. Data collection was conducted using an online survey method with purposive sampling. The study sample consisted of 241 respondents, all of whom were TikTok Shop users who had previously made online purchases and were over 18 years old. Data analysis employed the Structural Equation Model (SEM) using AMOS 24 software. The study found that e-service quality had a significant positive effect on customer trust, while perceived risk had a significant negative effect. E-service quality and customer trust increased repurchase intention, whereas perceived risk decreased it. Customer trust mediated the relationship between e-service quality and repurchase intention but was not strong enough to mediate the negative influence of perceived risk.
KEYWORDS:
E-Service Quality, Perceived Risk, Customer Trust, Repurchase Intention
REFERENCES:
1) Alwisol, (2016). Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Universitas Negeri Malang Press.
2) Amar, S., & Udin, Z. (2021). Self-efficacy and employee performance: The role of motivation and resilience. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(4), 45-60.
3) Angga, D. (2018). Pengembangan Karir Karyawan di Perusahaan. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
4) Bale, P. (2021). Employee engagement: A global concern for executives and organizations. International Journal of Business & Management, 25(3), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbm.2021.03.003
5) Bandura, A. (2020). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
6) Busro, M. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
7) Cherrington, D. J. (1989). The Management of Human Resources. Allyn & Bacon.
8) Crites, S. (2019). Job satisfaction and performance: The impact of employee attitudes. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 14(2), 210-225.
9) Darnell, D., & Guzman, S. (2020). The mediating effect of job satisfaction on self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 17(3), 88-104.
10) Eatough, E. M., et al. (2011). "The influence of employee engagement on job satisfaction and job performance." Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 376-387.
11) Hadi, N., & Rizal, M. (2021). Career development as a predictor of employee performance: The role of job satisfaction. Business and Management Journal, 23(1), 34-46.
12) Hair, J. F., et al. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
13) Hair, J. F., et al. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
14) Herzberg, F. (1959). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15) Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and Job Performance: Theory, Research, and Implications for Managerial Practice.Sage Publications.
16) Judge, T. A., et al. (2020). Job satisfaction and performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 73(2), 279-307.
17) Kahya, E. (2007). "The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance: The case of the Turkish textile industry." International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 409-415.
18) Kasmir, I. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
19) Koopsman, R. (2012). Perilaku Organisasi: Pendekatan Sumber Daya Manusia. Salemba Empat.
20) Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2005). Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill.
21) Lepine, J. A., et al. (2005). "A meta-analysis of performance in organizations: The role of motivation and individual differences." Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 689-701.
22) Raziq, A., & Maulabakhsh, R. (2019). Career development and employee performance: The role of motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(1), 47-61.
23) Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.
24) Schmidt, F. L. (2002). "The influence of job analysis on human resource management." Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 105-130.
25) Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
26) Spector, P. E. (2015). Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Cause, and Consequences. Sage Publications.
27) Waal, A. D. (2018). The Balanced Scorecard in Organizations. Springer.
28) Weng, Q., & McElroy, J. C. (2022). Career development and employee performance: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 101512.