Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure and Tax Avoidance: Systematic Literature Review
1Mutiara Syalwa, 2Danti Sagita, 3Lukluk Fuadah, 4Mukhtaruddin
1,2,3,4Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i12-35ABSTRACT:
This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) to explore the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), ownership structure, and tax avoidance. Drawing from high-quality research published between 2017 and 2024 in reputable, Scopus-indexed journals, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how these factors influence corporate tax behavior. The findings reveal the dual role of CSR, where it is both a deterrent to aggressive tax strategies and a tool to mitigate reputational risks associated with tax avoidance. Similarly, ownership structures, including family, institutional, and state ownership, exhibit varying impacts on tax avoidance, influenced by motivations such as profit maximization, transparency, and ethical considerations. This review integrates grand theories—including governance, economic, and cultural perspectives—to contextualize the complexities of tax avoidance. It highlights the inconsistencies in existing findings, stemming from differences in regional, cultural, and regulatory environments. Furthermore, it identifies underexplored independent variables, such as coercive power and cultural dimensions, as promising areas for future research. By synthesizing diverse perspectives, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the ethical and strategic dimensions of tax avoidance. It offers valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to balance financial objectives with societal expectations. The findings underscore the importance of aligning corporate governance practices with transparency and accountability. This article aspires to inspire further research, particularly on underutilized variables, to enrich the discourse and advance knowledge in the field of tax avoidance and corporate responsibility.
KEYWORDS:
CSR, Ownership Structure, Tax Avoidance
REFERENCES:
1) Al Lawati, H., & Hussainey, K. (2021). Risk and Financial Management Do Overlapped Audit Committee Directors Affect Tax Avoidance? https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm1410
2) Alkurdi, A., & Mardini, G. H. (2020). The impact of ownership structure and the board of directors’ composition on tax avoidance strategies: empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(4), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2020-0001
3) Almaharmeh, M. I., Shehadeh, A., Alkayed, H., Aladwan, M., & Iskandrani, M. (2024). Family Ownership, Corporate Governance Quality and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from an Emerging Market—The Case of Jordan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17020086
4) Alsaadi, A. (2020). Financial-tax reporting conformity, tax avoidance and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(3), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-10-2019-0133
5) Arifin, I. S., & Rahmiati, A. (n.d.). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Aggressiveness: An Indonesian Study. In International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net (Vol. 13).
6) Balaskas, S., Nikolopoulos, T., Koutroumani, M., & Rigou, M. (2024). Determinants of Tax Avoidance Intentions in Tourism SMEs: The Mediating Role of Coercive Power, Digital Transformation, and the Moderating Effect of CSR. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219322
7) Bauweraerts, J., Vandernoot, J., & Buchet, A. (2020). Family Firm Heterogeneity and Tax Aggressiveness: A Mixed Gamble Approach. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 37(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1528
8) Bhattacharyya, A., & Imam, T. (2024). Mandated CSR spending and Tax aggressiveness: A machine learning-driven analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142140
9) Bird, A., & Karolyi, S. A. (2018). Governance and Taxes: A Note on Methodology.
10) Bradshaw, M., Liao, G., & Ma, M. (Shuai). (2019). Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major Shareholder. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2–3), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.10.002
11) Choi, J., & Park, H. (2022). Tax Avoidance, Tax Risk, and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010469
12) Cumming, D., & Nguyen, M. (2024). The impact of asset specificity on corporate tax avoidance: Do financial constraints and product market power matter? British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101515
13) Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2009). The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance.
14) Gaaya, S., Lakhal, N., & Lakhal, F. (2017). Does family ownership reduce corporate tax avoidance? The moderating effect of audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(7), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2017-1530
15) Gulzar, M. A., Cherian, J., Sial, M. S., Badulescu, A., Thu, P. A., Badulescu, D., & Khuong, N. V. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility influence corporate tax avoidance of Chinese listed companies? Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124549
16) Habib, A., Ranasinghe, D., & Perera, A. (2024). Strategic Deviation and Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Risk Management Perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17040144
17) Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. In Journal of Accounting and Economics (Vol. 50, Issues 2–3, pp. 127–178). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
18) Hossain, M. S., Ali, M. S., Ling, C. C., & Fung, C. Y. (2024). Tax avoidance and tax evasion: current insights and future research directions from an emerging economy. In Asian Journal of Accounting Research (Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 275–292). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2023-0305
19) Jiang, Y., Zheng, H., & Wang, R. (2021). The effect of institutional ownership on listed companies’ tax avoidance strategies. Applied Economics, 53(8), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1817308
20) Kałdoński, M., & Jewartowski, T. (2024). Tax aggressiveness under concentrated ownership: The importance of long-term institutional investors. Finance Research Letters, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105541
21) Khan, H., Khan, S., & Zuojun, F. (2022). Institutional Quality and Financial Development: Evidence from Developing and Emerging Economies. Global Business Review, 23(4), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919892366
22) Kim, J., & Im, C. (2017). Study on corporate social responsibility (CSR): Focus on tax avoidance and financial ratio analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101710
23) Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
24) Landry, S., Deslandes, M., & Fortin, A. (n.d.). TAX AGGRESSIVENESS, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE.
25) Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2015). Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance? Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2052-8
26) Liu, H., & Lee, H. A. (2019). The effect of corporate social responsibility on earnings management and tax avoidance in Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 27(4), 632–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-08-2018-0095
27) López-González, E., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Meca, E. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1723
28) Lu, Y., Liu, R., Cao, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Tax Burden and Corporate Investment Efficiency. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031747
29) Mafrolla, E. (2019). Tax avoidance in government-owned firms: Evidence from Italy. Public Money and Management, 39(3), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1516955
30) Mcguire, S., Wang, D., & Wilson, R. (2011). Dual Class Ownership and Tax Avoidance.
31) Medioli, A., Azzali, S., & Mazza, T. (2020). Ownership-motivated income shifting: evidence from European Multinational Groups. Management Decision, 58(12), 2621–2637. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2019-1048
32) Mkadmi, J. E., & Ben Ali, W. (2024). How does tax avoidance affect corporate social responsibility and financial ratio in emerging economies? Journal of Economic Criminology, 5, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100070
33) Nurhaliza, H., & Rahma Sari, I. (2023). THE INFLUENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP, INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONERS AND CAPITAL INTENSITY ON TAX AVOIDANCE. SOCIAL SCIENCES AND BUSINESS, 2(4).
34) Sikka, P. (2018). Combating corporate tax avoidance by requiring large companies to file their tax returns. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 2(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-01-2018-0005
35) Stone, K. B. (2012). Four decades of lean: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461211243702
36) Tang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, J., & Li, W. (2019). Does more managerial power impede or promote corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from listed Chinese companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071914
37) Toumi, F., Bouraoui, M. A., & Khlif, H. (2022). National culture and tax avoidance: a quantile regression analysis. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 40(2), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-05-2022-0047
38) Tran, T. K., Truong, M. T., Bui, K. T., Duong, P. D., Huynh, M. V., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2023). Firm Risk and Tax Avoidance in Vietnam: Do Good Board Characteristics Interfere Effectively? Risks, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11020039
39) Velte, P. (2023). Determinants and consequences of corporate social responsibility decoupling—Status quo and limitations of recent empirical quantitative research. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (Vol. 30, Issue 6, pp. 2695–2717). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2538
40) Ying, T., Wright, B., & Huang, W. (2017). Ownership structure and tax aggressiveness of Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 25(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-07-2016-0070
41) Yoon, B. H., Lee, J. H., & Cho, J. H. (2021). The effect of esg performance on tax avoidance—evidence from korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126729