JEFMS Journal

Google Scholar

Article Pdf

---

ABSTRACT:

Fiscal decentralization, coupled with effective intergovernmental fiscal relations, stands as a cornerstone in the evolution of modern governance structures. This paper analyzes the implementation of fiscal decentralisation in Zambia as part of its initiatives across diverse socio-economic and political contexts for accelerated national development. The review was guided by three objectives which were: to review the existing legislation that supports implementation of fiscal decentralisation in Zambia; to assess the revenue and expenditure autonomy assignments of fiscal decentralisation in Zambia; and to recommend a fiscal transfer system to be used to enhance the implementation of fiscal decentralisation in Zambia. The study is based on secondary data on fiscal decentralization collected in official sources of Zambia’s Ministry of Finance and National Planning, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, and Cabinet Office – Decentralization Secretariat. All the data was processed by and used in the right format for the analysis of implementation of fiscal decentralization in Zambia. Through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, this study analysed the real level of fiscal decentralization made in Zambia. Key findings of the study was that Zambia does not have an institution to supervise fiscal decentralization except a desk at Cabinet Office – Decentralization Secretariat. Besides, Local authorities have little autonomy in administering revenues and expenses as such, one of them requires approval by the Minister of Local Government and Rural Development. This hampers innovation around revenue generation as there is no known parameter used to grant or deny approval. Additionally, some of the aspects of the Zambia Intergovernmental Fiscal Architecture have not been implemented thereby depriving local authorities of revenue. These include Matching grants, revenue sharing of tolls and Road Transport and Safety Agency (RATSA) fees which are supposed to be shared between Central Government and local authorities as road maintenance is a concurrent mandate and revenue sharing for national income collected by Central Government from local authority jurisdictions. Finally, the connection between the level of fiscal decentralization and the scheme of intergovernmental fiscal relations is very important, to ensure maximum effectiveness of local government financing. The quality of the distribution of funds provided by the scheme of intergovernmental fiscal relations and the level of fiscal decentralization has a direct relationship. Balancing these two mechanisms is the most important way to increase the quality of public services at the local level as a way of enhancing the implementation of the fiscal decentralization. Arising from the study’s finding, there is need for amendment and harmonization of legislation governing the devolution process and procedures in order to empower the designate entities to carry out their mandate without unnecessary cob-webs. The local authorities also need autonomy on revenue mobilization and expenditure which are devoid of central government interference and/or rent-seeking pursuits. Furthermore, there is need to balance the level of fiscal decentralization and the scheme of intergovernmental fiscal relations in order to improve the quality of funds distributed and the effectiveness and efficiency in local government financing.

KEYWORDS:

Implementation, Fiscal Decentralization, Local Authorities, Zambia.

REFERENCES:

1) Mwale, N and Hapompwe, C.C., (2024). An Analysis of Contributory Factors to Low Own Sources Revenue (OSR) in Local Authorities in Zambia: A Case Study of Muchinga Province. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies. Volume 07 Issue 07 July 2024. DOI: 10.47191/jefms/v7-i7-40. ISSN (print): 2644-0490, ISSN (online): 2644-050.

2) GRZ (2019). Local government Act, 2019. Lusaka. Government printers.

3) Alm, J., Anez, P. and Modi, A. 2004. ‘Stamp Duty in Indian States: A Case for Reform’, World Bank Policy Research Paper 3413, Washington DC: World Bank.

4) Ashraf, N., Bandiera, O. and Blum, F. 2016. Decentralisation in Zambia: A comparative analysis of strategies and barriers to implementation. International Growth Centre Report, S-41306-ZMB-1.

5) GRZ (2023). National Decentralization Policy. Lusaka. Government printers.

6) Bahl, R. 2004. ‘Property Transfer Tax and Stamp Duty’, ISP Working Paper 04-27, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

7) Bahl, R. and Bird, R.M. 2018. Fiscal Decentralization and Local Finance in Developing Countries, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

8) GRZ. (2018). Public finance management Act ,2018. Lusaka: Government printers.

9) Bahl, R. and Martinez-Vazquez, J. 2008. ‘The Property Tax in Developing Countries: Current Practice and Prospects.’ In Bahl, R., Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Youngman, J.M. (eds.) Making the Property Tax Work: Experiences in Developing and Transitional Countries. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 35-57.

10) Bahl, R., McCluskey, W., Franzsen, R. and Li. W. Forthcoming. ‘Comparative Analysis of the Property Tax in East and South-East Asia’, McCluskey, W., Bahl, R., Franzsen, R and Liu, Z (eds.) Property Tax in Asia. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

11) Bahl, R., Wallace, S. and Cyan, M. 2008. ‘Pakistan: Provincial Taxation’, Andrew Young School of Public Policy, Georgia State University. Working Paper 08-07.

12) Crook, R. and J. Manor, 2001. Local Governance and Decentralization in Zambia, Final Report to SNV, The Ministry of Local Government and Housing and the Donor Reference Group, Lusaka.

13) Mushimbwa, K. (2020) Examination of strategies of local revenue collection in local government authorities in Zambia: a case of Gwembe Districit Council. Lusaka: UNZA.

14) Pelekamoyo, G. (2011). Local autonomy and central government control in Zambian local authorities. Lusaka: university of Zambia press.

15) World bank (2019) world development report: the changing nature of work. New York: World bank.

16) World Bank (2014) Decentralization, accountability and local services in sierra leone: situation analysis, key challenges and opportunities for reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.

17) Capuno, J., Quimbo, S., Aleli, A., Kraft, D., Tan Jr., C.A. and Fabella, V.M. (2015) ‘Does yardstick competition influence local government fiscal behaviour in the Philippines?’, in J. P. Faguet, and C. Pöschl (eds.) Is Decentralization Good for Development? Perspectives from Academics and Policy Makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Channa, A. and Faguet, J. P. (2016) ‘Decentralization of health and education in developing countries: a quality-adjusted review of the empirical literature’. The World Bank Research Observer.

18) Lolojih, P. K. (2014). Local Government and Service Delivery. 50 Years of Local Government in Zambia, pp. 152-180.

19) Maurice Ayodele Coker, F. O. (2015). Challenges of Expanding Internally Generated Revenue in Local Government Council Areas in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development.

20) 66 Nicodemus Karori, D. W. (2016). Influence of Revenue Collection Efficiency on the Operational Performance of Kisii County Government, Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences and Information Technology, 235-240.

21) Niek, S. J. (2011). Fiscal Performance and Sustainability of Local Government in South AfricaAn empirical Analysis.

22) office, Z. A. (2017). Report of the Auditor General on the Review of Operations of Local Authorities. Lusaka: Government Printers, Zambia.

23) Ombui, P. K. (2018). Determinants of Optimal Revenue Collection in County Governments in Kenya: A Case of Bomet County. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 91-99

24) IGC (2016) Decentralisation of Government in Zambia: Baseline survey and a global comparative analysis of strategies and barriers to implementation. Accessed June 2024 at https://www.theigc.org/project/decentralisation-of-government-inzambia-baseline-survey-and-a-global-comparative-analysis-of-strategies-and-barriers-toimplementation

25) MLGH (2016) Revised guidelines on the management and utilization of the constituency development fund. Lusaka: government printers.

26) Mushimbwa, K. (2020) Examination of strategies of local revenue collection in local government authorities in Zambia: a case of Gwembe Districit Council. Lusaka: UNZA.

27) Pelekamoyo, G. (2011). Local autonomy and central government control in Zambian local authorities. Lusaka: university of Zambia press.

28) World bank (2019) world development report: the changing nature of work. New York: World bank.