Relationship between Intellectual Capital, Firm Performance and Leverage with Firm Values: Empirical Evident from Indonesia
Harmono Harmono
Economics and Business Faculty, Universitas Merdeka Malang,
Orchid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1933-5017
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i10-11
ABSTRACT:
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the Value Added Intellectual Capital (VAIC) components, Firm Performance and leverage on Firm Value. The validity of Firm Value measurements will be tested using Tobin's Q, Price Earnings per Share (PER), and Price to Book Value (PBV) with Assets as a control variable. The research design is explanatory research through hypothesis formulation, using panel regression. The research population is 122 manufacturing industries are listed on the Indonesian capital market, with a sample N valid of 277, observation period 2018-2020. Based on the robustness test, the model fits when the firm value uses Tobins'Q and PBV. Research findings show that Capital Employee Efficiency (CEE) and Return on Equity (ROE) positively influence Tobin'sQ. On the other hand, Firm Performance (ROA) positively influences firm value (PBV), Net Profit Margin (NPM) and leverage (DAR) negatively influence PBV. The inconsistency in research results on the influence of IC, Firm Performance, and Leverage on firm value is more caused by different measurement models. Therefore, in interpreting the relationship patterns of IC, Firm Performance and Leverage on Firm Value, must carefully based on the measurement characteristics and underlying concepts. IC, Firm Performance and Leverage substantially influence firm value, supporting previous research.
KEYWORDS:
Intellectual Capital, Firm Performance, Leverage, and Firm Value
Gel Clasification: M21, M5.
REFERENCES:
1) Adair, P. and Adaskou, M. (2015) ‘Trade-off theory vs. Pecking order theory and the determinants of corporate leverage: Evidence from a panel data analysis upon french SMEs (2002–2010)’, Cogent Economics and Finance, 3(1), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2015.1006477.
2) Aggarwal, D. and Padhan, P. C. (2017) ‘Impact of Capital Structure on Firm Value: Evidence from Indian Hospitality Industry’, Theoretical Economics Letters, 07(04), pp. 982–1000. doi: 10.4236/tel.2017.74067.
3) Awais, M. et al. (2016) ‘Impact of Capital Structure on the Firm Performance: Comprehensive Study of Karachi Stock Exchange’, Science International, 28(1), pp. 501–507.
4) Bakhsha, A., Afrazeh, A. and Esfahanipour, A. (2017) ‘A Criticism on Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC) Model’, IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 17(6), p. 59.
5) Bassetti, T. et al. (2020) A critical validation of the value added intellectual coefficient: use in empirical research and comparison with alternative measures of intellectual capital, Journal of Management and Governance. Springer US. doi: 10.1007/s10997-019-09494-w.
6) Blaylock, B., Lawson, B. P. and Mayberry, M. A. (2020) ‘Taxable income, future profitability, and stock returns’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 47(7–8), pp. 858–881. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12448.
7) Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J. and Hwang, Y. (2005) ‘An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), pp. 159–176. doi: 10.1108/14691930510592771.
8) Chen, Y. and Chou, R. K. (2015) The Effect EPS on Capital Structure, Journal National Chengchi University.
9) Cheng, Y., Liu, Y. and Chien, C. (2010) ‘Capital structure and firm value in China: A panel threshold regression analysis’, African Journal of Business Management, 4(12), pp. 2500–2507.
10) Edvinsson, L. (1997) ‘Developing intellectual capital at Skandia’, Long Range Planning, 30(3), pp. 366–373. doi: 10.1016/s0024-6301(97)90248-x.
11) Iazzolino, G. and Laise, D. (2013) ‘Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): A methodological and critical review’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(4), pp. 547–563. doi: 10.1108/JIC-12-2012-0107.
12) Kayo, E. K. and Kimura, H. (2011) ‘Hierarchical determinants of capital structure’, Journal of Banking and Finance. Elsevier B.V., 35(2), pp. 358–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.08.015.
13) Kim, J., Kim, S. and Lee, H. (2011) ‘An effect of technology innovation activity on firm value and a mediation effect of leverage: Evidence from Korean firms’, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 19(1), pp. 37–51. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2011.578430.
14) Kurniati, S. (2019) ‘Stock returns and financial performance as mediation variables in the influence of good corporate governance on corporate value’, Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19(6), pp. 1289–1309. doi: 10.1108/CG-10-2018-0308.
15) Liow, K. H. (2010) ‘Firm value, growth, profitability and capital structure of listed real estate companies: An international perspective’, Journal of Property Research, 27(2), pp. 119–146. doi: 10.1080/09599916.2010.500459.
16) Liu, Q. and Wong, K. P. (2011) ‘Intellectual capital and financing decisions: Evidence from the U.S. patent data’, Management Science, 57(10), pp. 1861–1878. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1380.
17) Maditinos, D. et al. (2011) ‘The impact of intellectual capital on firms’ market value and financial performance’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), pp. 132–151. doi: 10.1108/14691931111097944.
18) Mazur, K. (2007) ‘The determinants of capital structure choice: Evidence from Polish companies’, International Advances in Economic Research, 13(4), pp. 495–514. doi: 10.1007/s11294-007-9114-y.
19) Michael and MECKLING*, C. J. and W. H. (1976) ‘THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE’, Human Relations, 3, pp. 305-360.
20) Miller, F. M. and M. H. (1958) ‘THE COST OF CAPITAL, CORPORATION FINANCE AND THE THEORY OF INVESTMIENT’, American Economic Review, XLVIII(Juni), pp. 261–297. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.1.i.
21) Modigliani F. and Miller M. (1963) ‘Corporate_income_taxes_and_the_cost_of_c.pdf’, The American Economic Review, pp. 433–443.
22) MYERS, S. C. (1984) ‘The Capital Structure Puzzle’, The Journal of Finance, 39(3), pp. 574–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x.
23) Piri, P. et al. (2014) ‘A study on the effects of intellectual capital efficiency on economic performance’, Management Science Letters, 4(5), pp. 985–992. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2014.3.014.
24) Pulic, A. (2000) ‘VAICTM – An Accounting Tool for Intellectual Capital Management’, International Journal Technology Management, 20(5/6/7/8), pp. 702–714.
25) Pulic, A. (2004) ‘Intellectual capital – does it create or destroy value?’, Measuring Business Excellence, 8(1), pp. 62–68. doi: 10.1108/13683040410524757.
26) Pulić, A. (2008) ‘The Principles of Intellectual Capital Efficiency - A Brief Description’, Croatian Intellectual Capital Center, (76), pp. 1–24.
27) Smriti, N. and Das, N. (2018) ‘The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), pp. 935–964. doi: 10.1108/JIC-11-2017-0156.
28) Soewarno, N. and Tjahjadi, B. (2020) ‘Measures that matter: an empirical investigation of intellectual capital and financial performance of banking firms in Indonesia’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(6), pp. 1085–1106. doi: 10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0225.
29) Vo, X. V. and Ellis, C. (2017) ‘An empirical investigation of capital structure and firm value in Vietnam’, Finance Research Letters. Elsevier Inc., 22, pp. 90–94. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.10.014.
30) Weqar, F. and Haque, S. M. I. (2020) ‘Intellectual capital and corporate financial performance in India’s central public sector enterprises’, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 17(1), pp. 77–97. doi: 10.1504/IJLIC.2020.105323.
31) Weqar, F., Sofi, Z. A. and Haque, S. M. I. (2020) ‘Nexus between intellectual capital and business performance: evidence from India’, Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), pp. 180–195. doi: 10.1108/AJAR-07-2020-0064.