Rethinking the Corporate Governance Transparency in Vietnam’s ESG Landscape: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Investors
1Quan Nguyen Van, 2Khanh Ta Gia
1Faculty of Business Administration, Academy of Policy and Development, Hanoi, Vietnam
2Viet Duc High School, Hanoi, Vietnam
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v8-i5-32
ABSTRACT:
The importance of ESG in global finance marks a shift from valuing companies solely on financial metrics to assessing them through environmental, social, and governance lenses, with Vietnam embracing this trend amid rapid development and policy reforms like green bond growth and sustainability strategies. Despite this progress, ESG transparency among Vietnamese firms remains inconsistent and often symbolic, with limited standardization and strategic engagement, especially among SMEs. This study addresses a gap in the literature by investigating governance transparency from an investor perspective, emphasizing its potential as a strategic asset that influences brand reputation and investment decisions, moderated by digitalization and ESG awareness. Through a survey of 402 investors with survey data processed through PLS-SEM, the study shows that governance transparency can lead to higher brand reputation and thus higher investment intention. In addition, the perspective of digitalization plays an important moderating role, helping to promote the relationship between governance transparency and brand reputation in enterprises from the investor's perspective. However, ESG awareness does not moderate the relationship between brand reputation and intention to invest. The implications highlight that ESG practices treated as strategic initiatives rather than mere compliance can play a crucial role in building investor trust and attracting investment. Enterprises should enhance ESG transparency, adopt technology for accurate reporting, and embed sustainability into their core strategies, while policymakers can support this transition through legal frameworks and incentives that promote responsible business practices.
KEYWORDS:
Brand reputation; ESG awareness; ESG framework; governance transparency; investment intention.
REFERENCES:
1) Akerlof, G. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 235-251). Academic Press.
2) Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429-444.
3) Albu, O. B., & Flyverbom, M. (2019). Organizational transparency: Conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. Business & society, 58(2), 268-297.
4) Ananzeh, H., Alshurafat, H., Bugshan, A., & Hussainey, K. (2022). The impact of corporate governance on forward-looking CSR disclosure. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, (ahead-of-print).
5) Araújo, J., Pereira, I. V., & Santos, J. D. (2023). The effect of corporate social responsibility on brand image and brand equity and its impact on consumer satisfaction. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 118.
6) Au, A. K. M., Yang, Y. F., Wang, H., Chen, R. H., & Zheng, L. J. (2023). Mapping the landscape of ESG strategies: A bibliometric review and recommendations for future research. Sustainability, 15(24), 16592.
7) Benner, M. J. (2010). Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organization Science, 21(1), 42-62.
8) Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of cleaner production, 65, 42-56.
9) Broccardo, L., Truant, E., & Dana, L.-P. (2023). The interlink between digitalization, sustainability, and performance: An Italian context. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113621
10) Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98-115.
11) Chang, T. W., Chen, Y. S., Yeh, Y. L., & Li, H. X. (2021). Sustainable consumption models for customers: Investigating the significant antecedents of green purchase behavior from the perspective of information asymmetry. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(9), 1668-1688.
12) Chen, H. M., Kuo, T. C., & Chen, J. L. (2022). Impacts on the ESG and financial performances of companies in the manufacturing industry based on the climate change related risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 134951.
13) Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of environmental management, 345, 118829.
14) Déjean, F., Gond, J. P., & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human relations, 57(6), 741-764.
15) Drucker, P. F. (1995). The information executives truly need. Harvard business review, 73(1), 54-62.
16) Dubbink, W., Graafland, J., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2008). CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organisations. Journal of business ethics, 82, 391-406.
17) Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116.
18) Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116.
19) Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
20) Ejiogu, A., Ejiogu, C., & Ambituuni, A. (2019). The dark side of transparency: Does the Nigeria extractive industries transparency initiative help or hinder accountability and corruption control?. The British Accounting Review, 51(5), 100811.
21) Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual review of sociology, 24(1), 313-343.
22) Fenster, M. (2015). Transparency in search of a theory. European journal of social theory, 18(2), 150-167.
23) Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233.
24) Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233.
25) García-Sánchez, I. M., Frías-Aceituno, J. V., & Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2013). Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 60-72.
26) Government News. National Green Growth Strategy for 2021–2030, vision towards 2050. https://en.baochinhphu.vn/national-green-growth-strategy-for-2021-2030-vision-towards-2050-11142515.htm
27) Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation?. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 19(6), 793-819.
28) GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2020). Global Standards on Sustainability Reporting. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/
29) Guo, L., & Xu, L. (2021). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Sustainability, 13(22), 12844.
30) Hansen, H. K., & Flyverbom, M. (2015). The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization, 22(6), 872-889.
31) Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 405-440. https://vienptdn-vcci.vn/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Vbis-QII-2023-Report.pdf
32) Janamrung, B., & Issarawornrawanich, P. (2015). The association between corporate social responsibility index and performance of firms in industrial products and resources industries: empirical evidence from Thailand. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 893-903.
33) Jin, M., & Kim, B. (2022). The effects of ESG activity recognition of corporate employees on job performance: The case of South Korea. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 316.
34) Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668.
35) Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The accounting review, 91(6), 1697-1724.
36) Kim, E. H., & Lyon, T. P. (2015). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization science, 26(3), 705-723.
37) KPMG (2020). The road ahead: The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2020. KPMG International. McKinsey & Sustainability. How the E in ESG creates business value. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/sustainability-blog/how-the-e-in-esg-creates-business-value
38) Mahmood, A., & Bashir, J. (2020). How does corporate social responsibility transform brand reputation into brand equity? Economic and noneconomic perspectives of CSR. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12, 1847979020927547.
39) Niemann, L., & Hoppe, T. (2018). Sustainability reporting by local governments: a magic tool? Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers. Public management review, 20(1), 201-223.
40) OECD, 2021 – ESG investment trends and their impact on global business operations. Open Risk Manual. (2021). ESG risk integration challenges. https://www.openriskmanual.org/wiki/ESG_Risk_Integra-
41) Phukon, A., & Gakhar, D. V. (2022). Perils of public sector enterprises in India: is privatization of central public sector enterprises a sustainable strategy?. PSU Research Review, 6(1), 59-73.
42) PwC Vietnam (2022). Vietnam ESG Readiness Report 2022. https://www.pwc.com/vn/en/publications/vietnam-publications/esg-readiness-2022.html
43) Ritter, T., & Pedersen, C. L. (2020). Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in business-to-business firms: Past, present, and future. Industrial marketing management, 86, 180-190.
44) Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of management, 42(7), 1784-1810.
45) Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. e arterly Journal of Economics, 87 (3): 355–374. Cited on, 11.
46) Strebel, H., & Philippe, D. (2023). Sounds of Silence: A Multimodal Approach to Silence in Discourses of Corporate Sustainability. Available at SSRN 4409609.
47) TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures). (2020). Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
48) Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2023). Survey on SMEs and ESG Adoption in Vietnam. Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
49) United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI). (2020). A practical guide to ESG integration in equity investing.
50) Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VCCI). (2023). ESG adoption among Vietnamese SMEs: Challenges and opportunities.
51) World Bank. (2021). Vietnam’s path to a sustainable economy: The role of ESG factors in development.
52) Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of global responsibility, 8(2), 169-178.
53) Xu, S., Mingzhu, L., Bu, N., & Pan, S. (2017). Regulatory frameworks for ecotourism: An application of total relationship flow management theorems. Tourism Management, 61, 321-330.