Assessing the Necessity of GAAR In Indonesia: A Comparative Evaluation of Global GAAR Frameworks and the Development of an Effective Statutory Model to Mitigate Tax Avoidance
Alexander Ketut Wahyu Adiyanta
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo, Japan
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v8-i2-57ABSTRACT:
This paper aims to identify the most appropriate General anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) to be adopted by Indonesia. It looks into the Indonesian legal framework, compares the GAARs in other countries, and discusses various jurisprudential decisions to measure the effectiveness of the GAARs of other jurisdictions. In doing so, this paper simultaneously contributes to academic literature and Indonesian taxation policy by offering technical recommendations to Indonesia’s government to promote and support the fairness and integrity of its tax system and discourage the abuse of avoidance measures by its taxpayers. After a thorough review of Indonesia’s tax laws and rules, it is shown that the current specific anti-avoidance rules (SAARs) and the limited application of the substance-over-form principle are inadequate in addressing the rampant use of tax avoidance practices of Indonesian taxpayers. To bridge this gap, a statutory GAAR primarily applicable to corporate taxpayers is proposed. The proposal adopts the pre-determination of whether a scheme falls within the purview of GAAR, a lower GAAR threshold for transactions involving corporate taxpayers, and the institution of an independent GAAR panel.
KEYWORDS:
General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR), Specific Anti-Avoidance Rules (SAARs), Tax Avoidance, Indonesia, Corporate Taxation
REFERENCES:
1) Alfon Titus (2019). Designing a General Anti-Avoidance Rule for the East African Community – A Comparative Analysis. World Tax Journal, Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 261-301, 2019.
2) B.J. Arnold (1995). The Canadian General Anti-Avoidance Rule. British Tax Review 6, p. 548.
3) Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., and Myers, L. A. (2010). Book-Tax Conformity, Earnings Persistence, and The Association between Earnings and Cash Flows. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (1),111–125.
4) Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., and Myers, L. A. (2012). Home Country Tax System Characteristics and Corporate Tax Avoidance: International Evidence. The Accounting Review (American Accounting Association), 87 (6), 1831-1860.
5) B. Bawono Kristiaji & Denny Vissaro (2017). Measuring BEPS and its Countermeasures in Indonesia: A Preliminary Research Guide. DDTC Working Paper.
6) Beer, S., Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2019). International Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Review of the Channels, Magnitudes, and Blind Spots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12305.
7) Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2014). Why do developing countries tax so little? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 99–120. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/jep.28.4.99
8) Beswick, B., and Nijhawan, A., Canada in: Anti-avoidance Measures of General Nature and Scope - GAAR and Other Rules 222. Vol 103A (IFA Cahiers, 2018).
9) CIAT (2021, September 20). General anti-avoidance or abuse clause (GAAR): Its Genesis and evolution in tax law and legal certainty. CIAT. https://www.ciat.org/ciatblog-general-anti-avoidance-or-abuse-clause-gaar-its-genesis-and-evolution-in-tax-law-legal-certainty/?lang=en
10) Cowx, M., & Kerr, J. N. (2019). The General Anti-Avoidance Rule. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3485084.
11) D.G. Duff & B. Alarie (2018). Legislated Interpretation and Tax Avoidance in Canadian Income Tax Law, in Legislating Statutory Interpretation: Perspectives from the Common Law World. University of British Columbia.
12) Ernst & Young. (2013). GAAR Rising Mapping Tax Enforcement’s Evolution. www.ey.com/tax ED 0614.
13) Hashimy, S. Q., & Benjamin, M. S. (2023). A Tale of Two Tax Systems: A Comparative Analysis of General Anti- Avoidance Rules Provisions in India and. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.48165/tlr.2023.3.1.6
14) Home. Eubelius. (2023, May 12). https://www.eubelius.com/en/news/belgiums-highest-courts-clarify-certain-aspects-of-the-national-and-european-anti-abuse-rules.
15) International Monetary Fund (2016). Introducing a General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR): Ensuring That a GAAR Achieves Its Purpose. IMF Publication.
16) International Monetary Fund (2018b). Indonesia: Selected Issues; Country Report No. 18/33; December 21, 2017 (Vol. 18). Washington D.C. IMF Publication.
17) J. Li & T. Hwong (2013), GAAR in Action: An Empirical Exploration of Tax Court of Canada Decisions (1997- 2009) and Judicial Decision Making. Canadian Tax Journal.
18) Matsuda, N. (2015). Tax Strategy Vs. Countermeasures. Xlibris Corporation.
19) Niken Evi Suryani & Ken Devos (2016). The Proposed Design of an Indonesian General Anti-Avoidance Rules. The Australian National University.
20) Öner, C. (2020, March 1). Comparative Analysis of the General Anti-Abuse Rule of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive: An Effective Tool to Tackle Tax Avoidance? https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/EC+Tax+Review/29.1/ECTA2020005.
21) Rosid, A., & daholi, tengku. (2018). Tax Design and Administration in a Post-BEPS Era: Key Reform Measures in Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3328604
22) Satyadini, A. E. (2015). Empirical Approach of Tax Avoidance Risk Assessment. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
23) Sayed, Q.H. and Benjamin M.S.(2023). A Tale of Tax Systems: A Comparative Analysis of General Anti-Avoidance Rules Provisions in India and Australia. Trinity Law Review.
24) Waerzeggers, C. and Hillier, C., 2016, “Introducing a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR)—Ensuring that a GAAR achieves its purpose,” Tax Law IMF Technical Note 2016/1, IMF Legal Department
25) Wijaya, S., & Kusumaningtyas, D. S. (2020). Analyzing and formulating a statutory general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2020.v15.i01.p04.
