The Effect of Proactive Personality and Entrepreneurial Leadership on Innovative work Behavior Mediated by work Engagement in State Civil Apparatus at the Cooperative Service in West Sumatera
1Muhammad Sophian Tawar, 2Syahrizal
1Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Padang State University, Indonesia
2Lecturer in the Master of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Padang State University, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v8-i1-21
ABSTRACT:
This study aims to analyze the effect of proactive personality and entrepreneurial leadership on innovative work behavior mediated by work engagement in state civil apparatus at the cooperative service in West Sumatera. The type of research uses explanatory research. While the research approach uses an explanatory survey that emphasizes quantitative research methods. The entire population Civil Service of the Cooperatives Department in West Sumatera totaling 664 people, with a sample size of 250 people. The sampling technique used proportionate stratified random sampling. Data analysis using Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS). The mediation testing strategy uses the path coefficient significance. The results of the study found proactive Personality has a positive and significant effect on work engagement. Proactive Personality has a positive and significant effect on Innovative Work Behavior. Work engagement has a positive and significant effect on Innovative Work Behavior. Entrepreneurial Leadership has a positive and significant effect on work engagement. Entrepreneurial Leadership has a positive and significant effect on Innovative Work Behavior. Work engagement mediates the influence of Proactive Personality and Entrepreneurial Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior with the form of mediation is complementary mediation in the form of partial mediation
KEYWORDS:
Proactive Personality, Entrepreneurial Leadership, Work Engagement, Innovative Work Behavior
REFERENCES:
1) Abdullah, S. M. (2019). Social Cognitive Theory: A Bandura Thought Review published in 1982-2012. Psikodimensia, 18(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.24167/psidim.v18i1.1708
2) Afero, F. I., Dimala, C. P., & Ibad, M. C. (2023). Self-Efficacy as a Mediation the Influence of Proactive Personality on Career Adaptability in Early Adults. Psikostudia : Jurnal Psikologi, 12(4), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v12i4.12315
3) Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2020). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Publishing Limited, 24(4), 1082–1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2020-0008
4) Agarwal, U. A. (2014a). Examining the impact of social exchange relationships on innovative work behaviour: Role of work engagement. Team Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 20(3–4), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-01-2013-0004
5) Agarwal, U. A. (2014b). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 43(1), 41–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2012-0019
6) Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063
7) Akbari, M., Bagheri, A., Imani, S., & Asadnezhad, M. (2021). Does entrepreneurial leadership encourage innovation work behavior? The mediating role of creative self-efficacy and support for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0283
8) Al Mehrzi, N., & Singh, S. K. (2016). Competing through employee engagement: a proposed framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(6), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2016-0037
9) Bagheri, A., Akbari, M., & Artang, A. (2022). How does entrepreneurial leadership affect innovation work behavior? The mediating role of individual and team creativity self-efficacy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0281
10) Bagheri, A., & Harrison, C. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership measurement: a multi-dimensional construct. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(4), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2019-0027
11) Bai, Y., Wang, Z., Alam, M., Gul, F., & Wang, Y. (2022). The Impact of Authentic Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior: Mediating Roles of Proactive Personality and Employee Engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879176
12) Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207
13) Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
14) Bergeron, D. M., Schroeder, T. D., & Martinez, H. A. (2014). Proactive Personality at Work: Seeing More to Do and Doing More? Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9298-5
15) Bos-Nehles, A., Bondarouk, T., & Nijenhuis, K. (2017). Innovative work behaviour in knowledge-intensive public sector organizations: the case of supervisors in the Netherlands fire services. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244894
16) Buil, I., Martínez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.014
17) Cai, D., Cai, Y., Sun, Y., & Ma, J. (2018). Linking empowering leadership and employee work engagement: The effects of person-job fit, person-group fit, and proactive personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(July), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01304
18) Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Khapova, S. N., & Bossink, B. A. G. (2019). Does Entrepreneurial Leadership Foster Creativity Among Employees and Teams? The Mediating Role of Creative Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9536-y
19) Chong, S., Dyne, V. L., Kim, Y. J., & Oh, J. K. (2021). Drive and Direction: Empathy with Intended Targets Moderates the Proactive Personality–Job Performance Relationship via Work Engagement. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(2), 576–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12240
20) De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
21) Dhir, S., & Shukla, A. (2019). Role of organizational image in employee engagement and performance. Benchmarking An International Journal, 26(3), 971–989. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2018-0094
22) Doğanülkü, H. A., & Korkmaz, O. (2023). The role of proactive personality and general self-efficacy in proactive career behavior: a mediation model. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-023-09597-9
23) Firmansyah, D., & Saepuloh, D. (2022). Social Learning Theory: Cognitive and Behavioral Approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(3), 297–324. https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/jiph/index
24) Fontana, A., & Musa, S. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership measurement validation on innovation management and its measurement validation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 2–19.
25) Garg, S., & Dhar, R. (2017). Employee service innovative behavior: The roles of leader-member exchange (LMX), work engagement, and job autonomy. International Journal of Manpower, 38(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2015-0060
26) Gupta, V. K., & Batra, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in Indian SMEs: Universal and contingency perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 660–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615577708
27) Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Rstedt, M. S. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In SAGE Publications, Inc,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
28) Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (Second). Sage Publications.
29) Hsiao, H.-C., Chang, J.-C., Tu, Y.-L., & Chen, S.-C. (2011). The Impact of Self-efficacy on Innovative Work Behaviorfor Teachers. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2011.v1.6
30) Huang, S., Ding, D., & Chen, Z. (2014). Entrepreneurial leadership and performance in chinese new ventures: A moderated mediation model of exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and environmental dynamism. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12085
31) Iqbal, A., Nazir, T., & Ahmad, M. S. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership and employee innovative behavior: an examination through multiple theoretical lenses. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2020-0212
32) Kebede, S., & Wang, A. (2022). Organizational Justice and Employee Readiness for Change: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(March), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806109
33) Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020205
34) Kumar, R., & Shukla, S. (2019). Creativity, Proactive Personality and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Examining the Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy. Global Business Review, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919844395
35) Lai, F. Y., Tang, H. C., Lu, S. C., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, C. C. (2020). Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement. SAGE Open, 10(1–11). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899085
36) Lauring, J., & Selmer, J. (2015). Job engagement and work outcomes in a cognitively demanding context. Personnel Review, 44(4), 629–647.
37) Li, C., Murad, M., Shahzad, F., Khan, M. A. S., Ashraf, S. F., & Dogbe, C. S. K. (2020). Entrepreneurial Passion to Entrepreneurial Behavior: Role of Entrepreneurial Alertness, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Proactive Personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01611
38) Li, M., Wang, Z., Gao, J., & You, X. (2017). Proactive Personality and Job Satisfaction: the Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy and Work Engagement in Teachers. Current Psychology, 36(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9383-1
39) Lv, A., Lv, R., Xu, H., Ning, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Team autonomy amplifies the positive effects of proactive personality on work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(7), 1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6830
40) Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2018). How Leadership and Public Service Motivation Enhance Innovative Behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12839
41) Montani, F., Vandenberghe, C., Khedhaouria, A., & Courcy, F. (2020). Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. In Human Relations (Vol. 73, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718819055
42) Mu’ah, Indrayani, T. I., Masram, & Sulton, M. (2019). Kepemimpinan. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
43) Newman, A., Neesham, C., Manville, G., & Tse, H. H. M. (2018). Examining the influence of servant and entrepreneurial leadership on the work outcomes of employees in social enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(20), 2905–2926. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1359792
44) Pan, B., Song, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021). The Relationship Between Preschool Teachers’ Proactive Personality and Innovative Behavior: The Chain-Mediated Role of Error Management Climate and Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734484
45) Papalexandris, N., & Galanaki, E. (2009). Leadership’s impact on employee engagement: Differences among entrepreneurs and professional CEOs. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 30(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730910961685
46) Pinela, N., Guevara, R., & Armijos, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial Leadership, Work Engagement, and Innovative Work Behavior: The Moderating Role of Gender. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, X(Issue 2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/764
47) Prieto, I. M., & Pérez-Santana, M. P. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
48) Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086
49) Sari, S., Kurniawan, H., & Okfrima, R. (2023). Peran Servant Leadership Terhadap Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Pegawai Pemerintahan Kota. Psyche 165 Journal, 16(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v16i1.217
50) Sarwoko, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: The Role of Creative Self-efficacy. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 23(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v23i2.2282
51) Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
52) Seibert, S. E., Grant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive Personality and Career Success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–427.
53) Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (Seventh ed). John Wiley & Sons.
54) Selmer, J., & Lauring, J. (2015). Work engagement and intercultural adjustment. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595815622491
55) Sengupta, S., Sharma, S., & Singh, A. (2020). Authentic Leadership Fostering Creativity in Start-ups: Mediating Role of Work Engagement and Employee Task Proactivity. Business Perspectives and Research, 9(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533720964298
56) Srirahayu, D. P., Ekowati, D., & Sridadi, A. R. (2023). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13557
57) Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
58) Uppathampracha, R., & Liu, G. (2022). Leading for Innovation: Self-Efficacy and Work Engagement as Sequential Mediation Relating Ethical Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12080266
59) Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Thomas, C. L., Yu, J., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101(May 2016), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.002
60) Yamak, O. U., & Eyupoglu, S. Z. (2021). Authentic Leadership and Service Innovative Behavior: Mediating Role of Proactive Personality. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021989629
61) Yang, F., & Chau, R. (2016). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Managerial Psychology Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 31(2), 467–482.
62) Yang, K., Yan, X., Fan, J., & Luo, Z. (2017). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work engagement: A polynomial regression analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.033
63) Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Wang, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2018). Who are the most engaged at work? A meta-analysis of personality and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1330–1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2303
64) Yulivan, I. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Organizational Trust dan Entrepreneurial Leadership terhadap Employee Engagement di Kementerian untuk Pertahanan Negara. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(2), 2051–2058. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i2.825
65) Yuspahruddin, A., Eliyana, A., Buchdadi, A. D., Hamidah, Sariwulan, T., & Muhaziroh, K. (2020). The effect of employee involvement on job satisfaction. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.7.72