The Intention to use Digital Investment Management Platforms Among Gen Z in Indonesia: Perspective from Individual and Technological Motives
1Pebri Yanida, 2Oliver Hasan Padmanegara, 3Tanti Irawati Muklis
1,2,3Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v8-i1-02ABSTRACT:
Financial technology services are one of the most important elements in today's digital world. A study shows that 75% of the younger generation, especially those aged 18-35 years, have started investing, with many of them utilizing digital platforms. These data show that Gen Z in Indonesia is increasingly actively participating in investing through digital platforms, both in the capital market and crypto assets. In this study, the author wants to focus on examining the readiness factor and adopting the investment management platform from FinTech services among Gen Z in West Java. This research aims to examine the factors that influence the intention and use of financial technology, especially digital investment platforms, using the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) models. Data were collected through an online survey using a questionnaire distributed via Google Forms, with a total of 300 respondents. Data analysis was conducted using SmartPLS v.3.2.9, with the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach to test the validity and reliability of the measurement model, as well as the relationship between constructs in the structural model. Based on the results of the hypothesis test, it can be concluded that most of the independent variables have a significant effect on Behavioral Intention (BI).
KEYWORDS:
Financial Technology, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Digital Investment Platform, Technological Readiness Index (TRI).
REFERENCES:
1) Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, September). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 890, No. 1, p. 012163). IOP Publishing.
2) Abdullah, E. M. E., Rahman, A. A., & Rahim, R. A. (2018). Adoption of financial technology (Fintech) in mutual fund/unit trust investment among Malaysians: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Int. J. Eng. Technol, 7(2.29), 110.
3) Afif, F. P., Handayani, P. W., & Pinem, A. A. (2018, October). Determinant factors of new investor intention for using online trading system. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC 2018) (pp. 1-6). Palembang, Indonesia: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2018.8780574
4) Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179– 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
5) Andayaningsih, S. (2023). UTAUT: Application of Financial Technology in Islamic Banks. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 10(1), 293-303.
6) Ariani, A. F., Napitupulu, D., Jati, R. K., Kadar, J. A., & Syafrullah, M. (2018, April). Testing of technology readiness index model based on exploratory factor analysis approach. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1007, No. 1, p. 012043). IOP Publishing.
7) Azman Ong, Mohd Hanafi & Yusri, Muhammad & Ibrahim, Nur. (2023). Use and behavioural intention using digital payment systems among rural residents: Extending the UTAUT-2 model. Technology in Society. 74. 102305. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102305.
8) C. Haddad and L. Hornuf, The emergence of the global FinTech market: Economic and technological determinants, Small Bus. Econ., vol.53, pp.81-105, 2019.
9) Chawla, U., Mohnot, R., Singh, H. V., & Banerjee, A. (2023). The Mediating Effect of Perceived Trust in the Adoption of Cutting-Edge Financial Technology among Digital Natives in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Economies, 11(12), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11120286
10) Chong, L. L., Ong, H. B., & Tan, S. H. (2021). Acceptability of mobile stock trading application: A study of young investors in Malaysia. Technology in Society, 64, 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech- soc.2020.101497
11) Chung, N., et al. (2015). "Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site." Computers in Human Behavior 50: 588-599.
12) D. W. Arner, J. Barberis and R. P. Buckley, The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm?, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.47, no.4, pp.1271-1319, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2676553, 2016.
13) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technol- ogy. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
14) Fernando, E., Angelia, V., Meiryani, & Pradipta, I. A. (2021, August). A propose model analysis of investor fac- tors on interests and decisions of using online investment applications. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech 2021) (pp. 240–244). Jakarta, Indonesia: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9534951
15) Hair Jr, J., Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
16) https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/10/06/investor-pasar-modal-di-ri-tembus-hampir-12-juta-per-agustus-2023.
17) https://rhbtradesmart.co.id/article/gen-z-dan-milenial-mulai-investasi-saham-ini-fenomenanya1
18) https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/23303-75-persen-generasi-muda-mulai-berinvestasi
19) Hung, S.-W. and M.-J. Cheng (2013). "Are you ready for knowledge sharing? An empirical study of virtual communities." Computers & Education 62: 8-17.
20) Khan, S. U., Liu, X., Khan, I. U., Liu, C., & Rasheed, M. I. (2020). Assessing the investors’ acceptance of electronic stock trading in a developing country: The mediating role of perceived risk dimensions. Information Resources Management Journal, 33(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2020010104
21) Khan, W.A., Abideen, Z. Effects of behavioural intention on usage behaviour of digital wallet: the mediating role of perceived risk and moderating role of perceived service quality and perceived trust. Futur Bus J 9, 73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00242-z
22) Leong MY, Kwan JH, Ming Ming L. (2021) Technology readiness and UTAUT2 in e-wallet adoption in a developing country.
23) Leong, M. Y., Kwan, J. H., & Lai, M. M. (2020, January). Examining the antecedents of customer adoption and intention to use mobile wallet: an empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (pp. 380-384).
24) Lubis, D., Wahyuni, K. T., Mahanani, Y., & Riyadi, A. H. (2022). Why does the young generation invest in sharia mutual funds on the Bibit platform?. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 264-279.
25) Mahri, A. J. W., Hermawan, R., & Ahmad, I. (2023). Society Readiness Index using Blockchain Technology in Zakat Payments: Technology Readiness Index Approach. Review of Islamic Economics and Finance, 6(1), 1-22.
26) Maldhini, A., & Patrisia, D. (2022). Comparative (https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/10/06/investor-pasar-modal-di-ri-tembus-hampir-12- juta-per-agustus-2023).
27) Mansyur, A., & Ali, E. B. E. (2022). The Adoption of Sharia Fintech Among Millenial in Indonesia: Moderating Effect of Islamic Financial Literacy on UTAUT 2. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(4), 1329-1343.
28) Nainggolan, C. I., & Handayani, P. W. (2023). Factors Affecting Individuals’ Behavioral Intention to Use Online Capital Market Investment Platforms in Indonesia. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 18, 001-029.
29) Nguyen, H., Pham, L., Williamson, S., & Hung, N. D. (2020). Individual investors’ satisfaction and loyalty in online securities trading using the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Management and Deci- sion Making, 19(2), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2020.108233
30) Parasuraman, A. (2000). "Technology Readiness Index (Tri):A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies." Journal of Service Research 2(4): 307-320.
31) Parasuraman, A. and C. L. Colby (2015). "An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index:TRI 2.0." Journal of Service Research 18(1): 59-74.
32) Rahadi, R. A., Dewi, E. K., Damayanti, S. M., Afgani, K. F., Murtaqi, I., & Rahmawati, D. (2021). Adoption analysis of online mutual fund investment platform for millennials in Indonesia. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 10, 74-81.
33) Rose, J., & Fogarty, G. J. (2010). Technology readiness and segmentation profile of mature consumers. In Proceedings of the 4th Biennial Conference of the Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 57-65). Academy of World Business, Marketing and Management Development.
34) Seiler, V., & Fanenbruck, K. M. (2021). Acceptance of digital investment solutions: The case of robo advisory in Germany. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101490
35) Senalasari, W., et al. (2022). The Role of Technology Acceptance and Readiness on Intention to Adopt Virtual Tourism Technology during The New Normal Era, Atlantis Press.
36) Sentanoe, W., & Oktavia, T. (2020). Understanding The Determinants of Funders on Crowdfunding Platform Using The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). ICIC Express Letters, 14(5), 1881-803.
37) Shahzad A, Zahrullail N, Akbar A, Mohelska H, Hussain A. COVID-19’s Impact on Fintech Adoption: Behavioral Intention to Use the Financial Portal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022; 15(10):428. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100428
38) Sharma, L., & Gera, N. Integrated Model of UTAUT2 and TRI to Assess the Perception of Users towards EPS.
39) Shulhan, F., & Oetama, R. S. (2019, August). Analysis of actual system use from Bukareksa mutual fund feature using Technology Acceptance Model. Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech 2019) (pp. 186–191). Jakarta/Bali, Indonesia: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2019.8843752
40) Siagian, Hotlan & Jiwa, Zeplin & Basana, Sautma & Basuki, Ribut. (2022). The effect of perceived security, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on consumer behavioral intention through trust in digital payment platform. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 6. 861-874. 10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.010.
41) Venkatesh, V. (2022). "Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT." Annals of Operations Research 308(1): 641-652.
42) Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425e478.
43) Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328e376.
44) Wang, Y. and B. A. Sparks (2014). "Technology-enabled services: Importance and role of technology readiness." Tourism Analysis 19: 19-33.
45) Wang, Y., et al. (2017). "Technology Readiness and Customer Satisfaction with Travel Technologies: A Cross-Country Investigation." Journal of Travel Research 56(5): 563-577.
46) Wicaksono, B. S., Jubaedah, J., & Hidayati, S. (2020). Understanding investment behavior intention toAmnas, M. B., Selvam, M., Raja, M., Santhoshkumar, S., & Parayitam, S. (2023). Understanding the Determinants of FinTech Adoption: Integrating UTAUT2 with Trust Theoretic Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(12), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120505