Analysis Risk Mitigation of Delay in Delivery Using House of Risk Method (Case: Air Cargo Transportation)
1Hally Hanafiah, 2Muhammad Riffat, 3Dedi Rianto Rahadi
1,3Universitas Presiden, Cikarang, Kabupaten Bekasi, Jawa Barat
2Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i9-54
ABSTRACT:
Logistics Service Provider Companies are responsible for ensuring the delivery of goods using land modes, sea modes and air modes on time. However, in reality there are many problems and obstacles faced in order to guarantee one of these important key performance indicators. This research uses the house of risk method to identify the causes of the risk of delays and design mitigation strategies that can be done to overcome this problem by conducting interviews and filling out house of risk questionnaires with respondents who understand the problem. In this research, 13 risk events and 19 risk agents were found, and 9 priority risk agents were found to cause the problem. After that, activities were carried out to design mitigation strategies that could be carried out and 8 preventive actions were identified and the sequence that must be carried out to overcome the risk of delays.
KEYWORDS:
Delayed, Risk, Air Cargo, House of Risk, Mitigation Strategy
REFERENCES:
1) Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2010). Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning, And Operation Fourth Edition (Fourth Edi). Pearson.
2) Evrianto, W. I. (2005). Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi Edisi Revisi (Edisi Revi). Andi.
3) Alijoyo, F. A. (2021). Risk Management Maturity Assessment based on ISO 31000 – A pathway toward the Organization’s Resilience and Sustainability Post COVID-19: The Case Study of SOE Company in Indonesia. 125–142. https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.icmef.2021.02.134
4) Pujawan, I. N., & Mahendrawati. (2017). Supply Chain Management Edisi 3 (Edisi 3). Andi.
5) O’Brien, W. J., Formoso, C. T., Ruben, V., & London, K. (2008). Construction Supply Chain Management Handbook. a. CRC Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=XFF75B-vzl4C
6) Rizaldy, W., & Rifni, M. (2013). Manajemen Dasar Penanganan Kargo (Udara dari/ke Laut via Darat). In Media
7) Bambang Herry Purnomo, Bertung Suryadharma, Ridha Ghaniy Al-hakim (2021). Risk Mitigation Analysis in a Supply Chain of Coffee Using House of Risk Method.
8) Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801
9) E Rizqiah (2017). Manajemen Risiko Supply Chain Supply Chain Risk Management Considerated To the Interests of Stakeholders in Sugar Industry
10) Hayati, E. N. (2014). Supply Chain Management (SCM) Dan Logistic Management. Jurnal Dinamika Teknik, 8(1), 25– 34
11) Dewi, D. P., Harjoyo, H., & Salam, A. (2020). Prosedur Administrasi Jasa Pengiriman Barang Di Pt Citra Van Titipan Kilat Tangerang. Jurnal Sekretari Universitas Pamulang, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.32493/skr.v7i1.4570
12) Fahmi, I. (2010). Manajemen Kinerja. Alfabeta.
13) Park, Y. H. (2010). A study of risk management and performance measures on new product development. Asian Journal on Quality, 11(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/15982681011051813
14) Zaroni. (2017). Logistics & Supply Chain Konsep Dasar - Logistik Kontemporer - Praktik Terbaik (P. M. PUBLISHING, Ed.).
15) Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2014). Manajemen Operasi: Manajemen Keberlangsungan dan Rantai Pasokan (Edisi 11). Pearson Education, Inc.
16) Dumbravă & Vladut-Severian, 2013. Using Probability – Impact Matrix in Analysis and Risk Assessment Projects.
17) Fetters et al., 2013. Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices
18) RB Johnson, AJ Onwuegbuzie (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.
19) T Guetterman (2015). Descriptions of sampling practices within five approaches to qualitative research in education and the health sciences.
20) Philipp Mayring (2001). Combination and Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Volume 2, No. 1, Art. 6