Navigating Tradition and Ethics: Consumer Perceptions of Luxury Brands Using Animal Products
Le Minh Duc
Kim Anh School, Vietnam
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i8-62ABSTRACT:
This study investigates the complex relationships between consumer perceptions, brand equity, and customer loyalty in the context of luxury brands using animal products in Northern Vietnam. Employing a quantitative approach with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), we surveyed 228 luxury consumers in urban areas. Our findings reveal that consumer perceptions significantly influence all components of brand equity - brand awareness, brand associations, and perceived quality - which in turn strongly impact customer loyalty. Notably, brand equity partially mediates the relationship between consumer perceptions and customer loyalty. The study also uncovers the dual influence of cultural factors: traditional cultural values positively moderate the relationship between consumer perceptions and brand equity, while ethical concerns exert a negative moderating effect. These results contribute to the theoretical understanding of luxury consumption in emerging markets and provide practical implications for luxury brand management. Our research highlights the need for a nuanced approach in navigating the delicate balance between leveraging cultural heritage and addressing growing ethical concerns in the luxury sector.
KEYWORDS:
Luxury brands, Animal products, Consumer perceptions, Brand equity, Ethical consumption, Emerging markets
REFERENCES:
1) Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
2) Ajzen, I. (2015). Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 70(2), 121-138.
3) Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Costabile, M., & Guido, G. (2017). Sustainable luxury brands: Evidence from research and implications for managers. Journal of Business Research, 96, 259-271.
4) Atwal, G., & Williams, A. (2017). Luxury brand marketing – The experience is everything! In J.-N. Kapferer, J. Kernstock, T. O. Brexendorf, & S. M. Powell (Eds.), Advances in Luxury Brand Management (pp. 43-57). Palgrave Macmillan.
5) Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
6) Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93.
7) Cheah, I., Shimul, A. S., Liang, J., & Phau, I. (2020). Consumer attitude and intention toward luxury brands: A cross-cultural study of South Korea and China. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102248.
8) Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.
9) Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10) Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
11) Davies, I. A., Lee, Z., & Ahonkhai, I. (2012). Do consumers care about ethical-luxury? Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 37-51.
12) Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 00149.
13) Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
14) George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson.
15) Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
16) Henninger, C. E., Alevizou, P. J., & Oates, C. J. (2017). What is sustainable fashion? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21(3), 400-416.
17) Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
18) Jain, S., & Khan, M. N. (2017). Measuring the impact of beliefs on luxury buying behavior in an emerging market: Empirical evidence from India. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21(3), 341-360.
19) Kang, J., & Hustvedt, G. (2014). Building trust between consumers and corporations: The role of consumer perceptions of transparency and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 253-265.
20) Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
21) Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (4th ed.). Pearson.
22) Kong, H. M., Witmaier, A., & Ko, E. (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research, 131, 640-651.
23) Le, T. T. T., & Nguyen, T. M. T. (2020). Attitudes toward and purchase intention of counterfeit luxury goods in Vietnam: The moderating role of social context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(8), 1785-1810.
24) Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.
25) Lundblad, L., & Davies, I. A. (2016). The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(2), 149-162.
26) Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., Bosangit, C., Ferreira, C., & McGrath, M. (2017). Understanding ethical luxury consumption through practice theories: A study of fine jewellery purchases. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 525-543.
27) Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, T. T. M., & Barrett, N. J. (2021). The role of social identity in shaping luxury purchasing behavior: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102382.
28) Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
29) Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33-44.
30) Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
31) Prentice, C., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2018). Consumer-based approach to customer engagement – The case of luxury brands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 325-332.
32) Shukla, P., Singh, J., & Banerjee, M. (2015). They are not all same: Variations in Asian consumers' value perceptions of luxury brands. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 265-278.
33) Statista. (2023). Luxury goods - Vietnam. Retrieved from [URL]
34) Tran, T. T. H., Pham, L. M. T., & Pham, L. (2022). Brand love in luxury consumption: The role of brand trust and brand attachment. Journal of Business Research, 148, 14-24.
35) Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1-14.