Effect of Open Market Operations on Income Inequality
1William M. Njeru, 2Elvis M. Kiano, 3Richard K. Siele
1Masters student department of Economics, Moi University, Kenya
2Department of Economics, Moi University, Kenya
3Department of Accounting, Moi University, Kenya
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i8-56
ABSTRACT:
Inequality is particularly relevant for public debates on the disaggregate implications of economic policies since they might have distinct effects across different segments of the population. Impact of monetary easing on inequality have recently attracted increasing attention especially in developing countries. This article examined the effect of open market operations on income inequality in Kenya. A quantitative research design method was adopted. The study utilized a quantitative cross-sectional data from the Kenya Continuous Household Survey Programme (KCHSP) for the years 2020 and 2021. Stepwise regression, forward selection model was executed with a threshold of 0.2. Further, the study was supported by Permanent Income Hypothesis, Kuznets Hypothesis and the modernization theory. Income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, was the dependent variable. Open market operations (repo, and reverse repo) was the independent variable in the model. The male headed households had a Gini coefficient of 0.58 while a Gini coefficient of 0.59 was attributed to female headed households, across the 47 counties. The results showed that open market operations (reverse repo) had a coefficient of 0.022, p=0.026< 0.05 which was positive and statistically significant at 5% level. The findings indicate that in order to effectively manage income inequality in the country, policymakers should adopt an interdisciplinary and multifaceted approach. This approach should take into account the differential impacts of various policy instruments on income distribution, with a particular focus on demographic segmentation. Additionally, policymakers should combine careful adjustments to monetary policy with targeted social and fiscal measures. These measures should be continuously informed by rigorous data analysis, with the aim of fostering a more inclusive and equitable economy.
KEYWORDS:
Income inequality, Monetary policy, Open market operations, Repo, reverse Repo
REFERENCES:
1) Ahiadorme, Johnson Worlanyo (2020). Monetary policy transmission and income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa. University of Verona.
2) Andersen, A. L., Johannesen, N., Jørgensen, M., & PEYDRÓ, J. L. (2023). Monetary policy and inequality. The Journal of Finance, 78(5), 2945-2989.
3) Asger Lau Andersen, Niels Johannesen, Mia Jørgensen, and Jos´e-Luis Peydro´ (2021). Monetary Policy and Inequality. University of Copenhagen, CEBI, DFI, CEPR, Imperial College and UPF-CREI-ICREA.
4) Auclert, A. (2019). Monetary policy and the redistribution channel. American Economic Review, 109(6), 2333-2367.
5) Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Motavallizadeh-Ardakani, A. (2018). Exchange rate changes and income distribution in 41 countries: Asymmetry analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 68, 266-282.
6) Bassey, G. E., Akpan, P. E., & Umoh, O. J. (2018). An assessment of the effectiveness of open market operations instrument of monetary policy management in Nigeria. Journal of economics and sustainable development, 9(8), 120-132.
7) Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., Kueng, L., & Silvia, J. (2017). Innocent Bystanders? Monetary policy and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 88, 70-89.
8) Colciago, A., Samarina, A., & de Haan, J. (2019). Central bank policies and income and wealth inequality: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(4), 1199-1231.
9) Davide Furceri, Prakash Loungani, and Aleksandra Zdzienicka (2016). The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks on Inequality. IMF.
10) Davtyan, K. (2016). Income inequality and monetary policy: An analysis on the long run relation. AQR–Working Papers, 2016, AQR16/04.
11) Davtyan, K. (2016). The distributive effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policies. AQR–Working Papers, 2016, AQR16/06.
12) Eunseong Ma† Louisiana, (2019). Monetary Policy and Inequality: How Does One Affect the Other. State University
13) Federal Reserve System Study Group. (2002). Alternative Instruments for Open Market and Discount Window Operations. Washington: Board of Governors.
14) Feldkircher, M., & Kakamu, K. (2022). How does monetary policy affect income inequality in Japan? Evidence from grouped data. Empirical Economics, 62(5), 2307-2327.
15) Furceri, D., Loungani, P., & Zdzienicka, A. (2018). The effects of monetary policy shocks on inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 85, 168-186.
16) Ghossoub, E. A., & Reed, R. R. (2017). Financial development, income inequality, and the redistributive effects of monetary policy. Journal of Development Economics, 126, 167-189.
17) Khan, Z., & Khan, M. A. (2023). The Effect of Monetary Policy on Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Asian and African Developing Economies. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 12(3), 133-158.
18) Kronick, J., & Villarreal, F. G. (2020). Monetary Policy, Income Inequality, and Inflation—What’s the Link?. CD Howe Institute e-Brief, 300.
19) Magwedere, M. R., & Marozva, G. (2022). Monetary policy and inequality links: should Central banks be concerned?. Global Business Review, 09721509221115227.
20) Mishra, P., & Montiel, P. (2013). How effective is monetary transmission in low-income countries? A survey of the empirical evidence. Economic Systems, 37(2), 187-216.
21) Omankhanlen, A. E. (2012). The effectiveness of monetary policy in achieving sustainable economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(6), 147-155.
22) Saiki, A., & Frost, J. (2020). Unconventional monetary policy and inequality: is Japan unique?. Applied Economics, 52(44), 4809-4821.
23) Samarina, A., & Nguyen, A. D. (2024). Does monetary policy affect income inequality in the euro area?. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 56(1), 35-80.
24) Xiang, L., Wang, W., Ren, J., & Zhao, Y. (2023). The impact of monetary policy shocks on income inequality: a tale of two countries. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(2).