An Assessment of the Effect of E-Procurement on Procurement Processes and Efficient Performance in Zambia’s Government Institutions: A Case Study of the Local Government Service Commission
1Mwamba Mwaba Mwangata, 2Chrine, C. Hapompwe
1,2ZCAS University, School of Business, 10101
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i7-91ABSTRACT:
This study aimed at assessing the impact of e-procurement on procurement processes and performance within Zambia’s government institutions, focusing specifically on the Local Government Service Commission (LGSC). The specific objectives were: to examine enhancements in procurement supply chain management facilitated by e-procurement implementation, to assess the impact of e-procurement on service delivery within the LGSC, and to analyze challenges encountered in e-procurement during the procurement processes inherent in the e-GP platform. The study adopted a mixed-method approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods to comprehensively assess the impact of e-procurement on procurement processes and efficient performance within Zambia’s government institutions. The study used 50 respondents involved in procurement processes across different levels within the Local Government Service Commission (LGSC) and other government institutions. Data collection methods included questionnaires, interviews, and personal observations conducted in the LGSC, two Ministries, and one Local Council in Lusaka Province. Purposive and simple random sampling were used as techniques. The data analysis involved content analysis techniques to interpret non-numeric data and provide insights into human experiences, perceptions, and behaviors related to e-procurement while excel / SPSS was used for quantitative data. Findings from the study revealed that e-procurement adoption holds significant potential for improving efficiency, transparency, supplier management, cost savings, and data management within government institutions. The findings underscored the policy implications for enhancing e-procurement practices within the LGSC and other government institutions in Zambia. Recommendations included investment in technological infrastructure, promoting a supportive organizational culture, and establishing mechanisms for continuous improvement. Future studies could focus on policy analysis and formulation processes, examining the alignment of e-procurement initiatives with broader national development goals and regulatory frameworks.
KEYWORDS:
Assessment, Effect, E-procurement, Procurement processes, Performance, Public Institutions, Zambia.
REFERENCES:
1) Boafo, J., Baidoo, R., & Sarfo, J. O. (2020). Assessing e-procurement impact in Ghana’s public sector: A case study of selected Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs). Journal of Public Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 12(2), 119-137.
2) Burrel, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann.
3) Bubala, M., & Lesa, T. (2024). The impact of e-GP systems on procurement efficiency in Zambia. Journal of Public Procurement, 16(3), 189-205.
4) Chege, M., & Otieno, R. (2020). Methodological rigor in qualitative research: Assessing validity through triangulation. Journal of Social Sciences, 45(4), 341-355.
5) Cheng, J. (2019). Implementation challenges of e-GP in Zambia. Zambia Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 122-137.
6) Chikulo, B. C. (2020). Challenges and prospects of e-procurement in Zambia's public sector. African Journal of Public Administration, 12(4), 98-114.
7) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
8) European Union. (2018). Best practices in e-procurement: A guide for EU countries. Brussels: European Commission.
9) Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2021). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
10) Hapompwe, C.C., Banda, N., & Chalwe, N.A. (2023). Examining Critical Success Factors for Africa’s Sustainable Industrial Development with Special Reference to Zambian Manufacturing Sector – Challenges, Prospects & Opportunities. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies. ISSN (print): 2644-0490, ISSN (online): 2644-050 Volume 07 Issue 1. DOI: 10.47191/jefms/v7-i1-59.
11) Hayatullah, M., Kinyanjui, N., & Aina, J. (2022). Challenges in public e-procurement practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for service delivery. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 14(1), 56-73.
12) Ivambi, A. (2016). Challenges in procurement processes within Tanzanian public organizations: A case study. Journal of Public Procurement and Management, 10(3), 247-263.
13) Madzimure, J., Bhebhe, T., & Sibanda, M. (2020). E-procurement and supply chain performance: A case of public entities in Zimbabwe. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 45-61.
14) Medhi, M. (2020). Impact of e-procurement on supply chain management in Pakistan's manufacturing sector. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 123-140.
15) Medhi Abbas, M. (2023). Integration challenges in e-procurement systems: Insights from the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102345.
16) Muhammad, A. (2022). E-procurement implementation in public sector organizations: Case of Pakistan. Journal of Public Procurement, 22(3), 265-289.
17) Muhammad, S. (2022). The influence of e-procurement practices on supply chain performance in the B2B procurement context in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Procurement, 7(2), 67-85.
18) Musheba, L.L., & Hapompwe, C.C. (2024). Assessing the Effect of Technological Integration on Procurement Efficiency of Zamtel, Lusaka, Zambia. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies. ISSN (print): 2644-0490, ISSN (online): 2644-050 Volume 07 Issue 07. DOI: 10.47191/jefms/v7-i7-41
19) Muwema, J. (2019). Evaluating the influence of IFMIS on public sector procurement in Zambia: A focus on transparency, efficiency, speed, and financial leakages. African Journal of Public Sector Development and Governance, 5(2), 87-102.
20) Mwamba, E. (2017). E-procurement and public sector efficiency: A case study of Zambia's LGSC. Zambian Journal of Public Sector Management, 4(3), 215-230.
21) Mwenda, S. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of e-GP systems in Zambia. Procurement and Supply Chain Review, 11(2), 95-108.
22) Nuwahereza, A. (2015). The role of e-procurement at Century Namamve Bottling Company. Ugandan Journal of Business Management, 3(1), 102-117.
23) Nyambane, P. M., & Ozor, O. (2020). Enhancing public procurement through e-GP in developing countries. African Journal of Procurement and Logistics, 6(4), 78-95.
24) Nyondo, L. (2016). The introduction and challenges of e-GP in Zambia. Zambia Public Procurement Journal, 3(1), 45-58
25) Phiri, A. (2014). Risks associated with e-procurement implementation in Zambia: An evaluation. Journal of Procurement Risk Management, 8(4), 215-232.
26) Pratt, K. (2007-2024). E-procurement and its impact on procurement efficiency. Journal of Procurement Technology, 17(2), 33-50.
27) Rogers, E. M. (2023). Diffusion of innovations (6th ed.). Free Press.
28) Sánchez, A. M., Lafuente, E., & Leiva, J. C. (2019). E-procurement implementation within SMEs: Top management support, IT challenges, and strategic purchasing. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1234-1256.
29) Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
30) Shakya, A. (2017). The role of procurement in organizational cost structures. International Journal of Procurement Management, 10(1), 47-63.
31) Vaidya, K., & Campbell, J. (2016). The impact of e-procurement systems on public procurement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Public Administration, 9(3), 110-126.
32) Waithaka, J., & Kimani, D. (2021). E-procurement adoption and supply chain performance in Kenyan county governments. Kenya Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 66-81.
33) Waithaka, P., & Kimani, J. (2021). Impact of e-procurement on supply chain performance in Kenyan county governments. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 17(1), 45-59.
34) World Bank. (2023). Rated Criteria for international procurements. Washington, DC: World Bank.