Leveraging the SCARF Model For Employee Engagement: An In-Depth Analysis With Special Reference To Government Organisations
1Neenet Baby Manjaly,2Vipin Francis,3Dilna Francis
1Faculty-Chief Manager, Union Leadership Academy, Union Bank Knowledge Centre- Bengaluru, India.
2Research Scholar, Dept. of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
3MBA Student- Adi Shankara Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kochi, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i6-36
ABSTRACT:
This research examines the effectiveness of the SCARF model (Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, Fairness) in enhancing motivation and increasing employee engagement within government organizations. We have conducted multistage sampling with a descriptive and analytical design and collected primary data through Likert scale questionnaires. Extensive statistical analysis using SPSS, including regression and correlation analyses, uncovered noteworthy outcomes. The findings demonstrate a significant positive relationship between the overall SCARF model and employee engagement. Furthermore, all dimensions except Fairness exhibited a strong positive association with engagement, suggesting the importance of fostering feelings of respect, security, control, and connection for a more engaged government workforce.
KEYWORDS:
SCARF, Employee Engagement, Motivation, Government Organisation, Public Sector, Workplace
REFERENCES:
1) Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. (2010). Employee Engagement: The Key to Improving Performance. International Journal of Biometrics, 5, 89. https://doi.org/10.5539/IJBM.V5N12P89.
2) Liu, Y., Yin, X., Li, S., Zhou, X., Zhu, R., & Zhang, F. (2021). The Relationship Between Employee’s Status Perception and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Psychological Path of Work Vitality. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 743 - 757. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S307664.
3) Bagneux, V., Bollon, T., & Dantzer, C. (2012). Do (un)certainty appraisal tendencies reverse the influence of emotions on risk taking in sequential tasks? Cognition and Emotion, 26, 568 - 576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.602237.
4) Tillott, S., Walsh, K., & Moxham, L. (2013). Encouraging engagement at work to improve retention. Nursing management, 19 10, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.7748/NM2013.03.19.10.27.E697.
5) Dorssen-Boog, P., Jong, J., Veld, M., & Vuuren, T. (2020). Self-Leadership Among Healthcare Workers: A Mediator for the Effects of Job Autonomy on Work Engagement and Health. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01420.
6) Tiedens, L., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing.. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81 6, 973-88 . https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973.
7) Rutte, C., & Messick, D. (1995). An integrated model of perceived unfairness in organizations. Social Justice Research, 8, 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334810.
8) Kolemba, M. (2016). Brain as a social organ. Practical application of social awards and threats - SCARF model - in management and building customer relationships training. General and Professional Education, 2016, 17-23.
9) Behery, M., & Abdallah, S. (2019). Organizational climate best practices: Empirical evidence from the UAE. Journal of Research in Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.30585/jrems.v1i3.343.
10) Rock, D., & Ringleb, A. (2013). Handbook of neuro leadership. California: Neuro Leadership Institute.
11) Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644-661. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0014241.
12) Freedman, B. (2019). Risk factors and causes of interpersonal conflict in nursing workplaces: Understandings from neuroscience. Collegian. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLEGN.2019.02.001.
13) Rock D (2008) scArF: a brain-based model for collaborating with and influencing others. Neuroleadership Journal. 1, 1, 1-5.
14) Campbell, S. J., Walsh, K., Prior, S. J., Doherty, D., Bramble, M., Marlow, A., & Maxwell, H. (2022). Examining the engagement of health services staff in change management: modifying the SCARF assessment model. International Practice Development Journal, 12(1).
15) Gagné, M., & Bhave, D. (2010). Autonomy in the workplace: An essential ingredient to employee engagement and well-being in every culture. In Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 163-187). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
16) Rock, D. (2008). SCARF: A brain-based model for collaborating with and influencing others. Neuro Leadership journal, 1(1), 44-52.
17) Basetoli Mishkat, M. M. (2015). Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and SCARF Model: Arecompatible or contradictory in contemporary management practice. International Journal in Management & Social Science, 3(11), 579-590.
18) Javadizadeh, B., Aplin-Houtz, M., & Casile, M. (2022). Using SCARF as a motivational tool to enhance students′ class performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(1), 100594.
19) Freedman, B. D. (2019). Risk factors and causes of interpersonal conflict in nursing workplaces: Understandings from neuroscience. Collegian, 26(5), 594-604.
20) Emde, M. J. (2012). Engagement in the workplace from a NeuroScience perspective. Management Today, 30(1), 8-11.
21) Forbes-Zeller, L. (2020). What role can social cognitive neuroscience play in promoting prosocial behaviours in organizations. Pepperdine University
22) Behery, M., & Abdallah, S. (2019). Organizational environment best practices: Empirical evidence from the UAE. Journal of Research in Emerging Markets, 1(3), 27-39.
23) Pope, S. N. (2019). A systematic literature review of school leadership intelligences for the development of neuro-educational leadership.
24) Hansen, J. M., Hansen, J. W., & Madsen, S. R. (2022). Improving how we lead and manage in business marketing during and after a market crisis: the importance of perceived status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness, and fairness. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, (ahead-of-print).
25) Marr, J. C., Steed, L. B., & Bianchi, E. (2017). How Status Inequality Undermines Work Engagement: The Role of Cynical Attitudes about Work. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 13038). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.