Relationship of Rice Farming Income with Socio-Economic Characteristics of Farmers
1Syamsu Qamar Badu, 2Mohamad Ikbal Bahua, 3Sarson W. Pomalato, 4dan Evi Hulukati
1,3,4Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
2Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i5-67
ABSTRACT:
Characteristics are ways of thinking and behavior that characterize each individual to live and work together in a family environment and social community. The purpose of the study was to analyze the relationship between rice farming income and socio-economic characteristics of farmers. The research method used is the survey method. The Data used in this study is the primary data sourced from respondents obtained through interviews using questionnaires, which consists of data on social factors, namely; age of farmers, farmers ' education, farming experience, and the number of family dependents, as well as data on economic factors, namely: land area and farming capital. While the secondary data is research supporting data sourced from the Department of Agriculture and other stakeholders. Determination of the location of the study using purposive sampling method and for sampling of research respondents using simple random sampling method as many as 30 rice farmers. The data analysis used is Pearson Correlation analysis. The results showed that: age has a positive relationship that is not significant with income, level of Education has a positive relationship that is not significant with income, farming experience has a positive relationship that is significant with income, the number of family dependents has a positive relationship that is not significant with income, land area has a positive relationship that is very significant with income, and capital has a positive relationship that is very significant with the income of farmers in rice farming.
KEYWORDS:
Characteristics, income, farmer, rice farming, socio-economic
REFERENCES:
1) Amandeep, D., Sher, J.K., Nazrul, I., Peter, R., & Meenakshi, N. (2023). Drivers of sustainable business model innovations. An upper echelon theory perspective. Journal Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 191 (6). 122 - 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122409.
2) Ameet, K.B., Subhendu, K.M., & Ahmet,S. (2024). Career aspirations and financial planning of young people in family businesses. Journal Research in International Business and Finance. 70 (6). 102 - 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102363.
3) Apichaya, L., & Tapan. B.P. (2024). Thai farmers’ perceptions on climate change: Evidence on durian farms in Surat Thani province. Journal Climate Services. 34 (4). 100 - 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100475.
4) Auvikki, D.B., Camilla, S., & David, C.R. (2024). To adapt or not to adapt, that is the question. Examining farmers’ perceived adaptive capacity and willingness to adapt to sustainability transitions. Journal of Rural Studies. 105 (1). 103 - 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103171.
5) Bezabih, F., Zekarias, Z., & Elias, B. (2024). Adoption of community-based land rehabilitation programs (CBLRP) and its effect on livelihoods in Offa district, south Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 16 (6). 101 - 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101104.
6) Changming, C., Qiang, G., Kexin, J., & Yuting, M. (2024). How digital skills affect farmers’ agricultural entrepreneurship? An explanation from factor availability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 9 (4-6). 10 - 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100477.
7) Debora, M.M., Chad, M.B., Melf, H,E., Robert, F., & Stefanie,B. (2023). Exploring actors' perceptions of the precision agriculture innovation system – A Group Concept Mapping approach in Germany and Switzerland. Journal Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 189 (4). 270 - 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122270.
8) Diana, K., Robert, L., & Miranda, P.M.M. (2023). The role of social capital in adoption of risky versus less risky subsidized input supplies: An empirical study of cocoa farmers in Ghana. Journal of Rural Studies. 97 (1). 140 - 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.027.
9) Gay, L.R. dan Diehl, P.L. (1992). Research Methods for Business and Management. MacMillan Publishing Company. New York.
10) Ghislain, B.D.A., & Arne, H. (2024). Does organic farming jeopardize food security of farm households in Benin?. Journal Food Policy. 124 (4). 262 - 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102622.
11) Gourav, S., Saurabh, S., Nivedita, K., & Sumit, K. (2024). Diurnal variation of air pollutants and their relationship with land surface temperature in Bengaluru and Hyderabad cities of India. Journal Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. 35 (8). 10 - 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101204.
12) Graeme, G. (2024). Farm debt and the over-exploitation of natural capital. Journal Resource and Energy Economics. 77 (4). 143 - 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2024.101439.
13) Heather, D., & Tim, C. (2023). Constructions of gender in contemporary Australian family farming: A rural financial counsellor perspective. Journal of Rural Studies. 102 (8). 308 - 325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103086.
14) Julia, B., Annemie, M., Wezi, M., & Hope, M. (2023). Paying for agricultural information in Malawi: The role of soil heterogeneity. Journal of Development Economics. 165 (10), 314 - 326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103144.
15) Kang, C. (2024). Family farming in climate change: Strategies for resilient and sustainable food systems. Journal Heliyon. 10 (4). 28 - 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28599.
16) Magdalena, W.K., & Hans, K.W. (2024). Beyond the preservation of agricultural land – Identifying Austrian farmers’ farming-related interests in local spatial planning. Journal of Rural Studies. 105 (1). 317 - 331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103170.
17) Nicholas, P.N., & Lars, B. (2021). Promises and potentials do not grow trees and crops. A review of institutional and policy research in agroforestry for the Southern African region. Journal Land Use Policy. 103 (4). 105 - 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105298.
18) Roberto, V., Terese, E.V., & Johannes, S. (2023). The ecosystem approach to agricultural value chain finance: A framework for rural credit. Journal World Development. 164 (4). 617 - 629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106177.
19) Yiming, S., Zhiwei, Z., Haojing, C., Fan, Z., Yuanlong, C., & Zhenghuan, Z. (2022). The potential of urban family vertical farming: A pilot study of Shanghai. Journal Sustainable Production and Consumption. 34 (11). 586 - 599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.011.