Internalization of External Cost in the Thermal Power Generation on Social Welfare Maximization
1Humphrey M. Njuki, 2Elvis M. Kiano, 3Lucy J. Rono
1Department of Economics, Mount Kenya University, Kenya
2,3Department of Economics, Moi University, Kenya
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i4-38ABSTRACT:
For decades, Kenya has incorporated thermal power technology into its grid to generate electrical energy using fossil fuels such as petroleum, natural gas, and coal. The burning of fossil fuels has become a major source of air pollutants and is associated with several undesirable side effects on the environment and human health. However, the impact of pollutants on environmental sustainability and public welfare has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the external cost of electricity generated by thermal power plants in Kenya. Both survey data and secondary data were used. The analysis was conducted using externality valuation and welfare maximization approaches, and the research hypotheses were tested using a negative binomial regression model. The annual external cost ($/2022) was determined to be $ 1,333,904,970.76, with the following distribution: environmental at $ 993,488,336.26, Public health at $ 86,760,038.01, and socio-economic at $ 253,656,596.49. Equally, the thermal power generation marginal social cost ($/2022) was determined to be 1.22 $cents/kWh with the following distribution: Marginal Private Cost (MPC) at 0.01 $cents/kWh and Marginal External Cost (MEC) at 1.21 $cents/kWh. The established marginal social cost (MSC) (i.e. Σ MPC+MEC) was 1.22 ($cents/kWh). Thus, MSC is significantly greater than the established social marginal benefit (SMB) of 0.089 ($ cents/kWh); hence, we conclude that the burden of social welfare loss is highly significant, making thermal power a non-sustainable and economic energy source.
KEYWORDS:
External costs, Internalization, Marginal social cost, Marginal social benefit, Social welfare maximization
REFERENCES:
1) Antoinette, B. (2021). Values in Welfare economics. halshs-03244909
2) Bielecki, A., Ernst, S., Skrodzka, W., & Wojnicki, I. (2020). The Externalities of Energy Production in the Context of Development of Clean Energy Generation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res, 27, 11506–11530.
3) Costa, C. R. D. S., & Ferreira, P. (2023). A Review on the Internalization of Externalities in Electricity Generation Expansion Planning. Energies, 16(4), 1840.
4) Coffel, E. D., & Mankin, J. S. (2021). Thermal power generation is disadvantaged in a warming world. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2), 024043
5) Drennen T.E., Baker A.B., & Kamery W. (2003). Electricity Generation Cost Simulation Model (GenSim). In: 2nd Quarter 2003 Newsletter of The International Association for Energy Economics.
6) Externe.info. 2018. The impact pathway approach: ExternE – External costs of energy. http://www.externe.info/externe_d7/?q=node/46 (accessed June 30, 2018)
7) Ferguson, C.E. (1972). Microeconomic Theory, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.
8) Fouladi F. R., Naddafi, K., Yunesian, M., Nabizadeh, N, R. (2016). The assessment of health impacts and external costs of natural gas-fired power plant of Qom. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(20
9) Georgiou, P.N. (2016). A Bottom-up Optimization Model for the Long-Term Energy Planning of the Greek Power Supply Sector Integrating Mainland and Insular Electric Systems. Comput. Oper. Res. 66
10) Ghoddousi, S. & Talebi, A. F. (2021). The External Cost of Electricity Generation: An Applicable Approach for Environmental Decision-Making on Electricity Exportation Strategy. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 5(3), em0165.
11) Henry D.V., & Stephan B. (2003). The Full Costs of Thermal Power Production in Eastern Canada; International Institute for Sustainable Development (http://www.iisd.org/); Manitoba, Canada: accessed Nov 2021
12) Huang, Y.H., Wu, J.H., & Hsu, Y.J. (2016). Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for the Regional-Scale Electricity Planning under Demand Uncertainty. Energy, 116, 1145–1157. [CrossRef]
13) Hutchinson, E. (2017). Principles of Microeconomics. University of Victoria
14) Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) (2020). Our generation mix. Available at: https://www.kengen.co.ke/. 2020. [Accessed on August 05, 2023].
15) Kenya, Ministry of Energy and Petroleum (2019). National Energy Policy (NEP) Sessional Paper NO. 4(2004). Nairobi: Government printers.
16) KPLC (2023) Annual report and financial statements for the year ended 30th June 2023. Available at: https://www.kplc.co.ke/AR2013/KPLC Annual Report 17_07_2023_Wed.p
17) Lukas, K., Marie-Jeanne, K., Thomas, D., and Tessa, S. (2019). The role of geothermal and coal in Kenya’s electricity sector and implications for sustainable development; New Climate Institute
18) Lehmann, P., Sijm, J., Gawel, E., Strunz, S., Chewpreecha, U., Mercure, J. F., & Pollitt, H. (2019). Addressing multiple externalities from electricity generation: a case for EU renewable energy policy beyond 2020?. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 21, 255-283
19) Lv, T., Yang, Q., Deng, X., Xu, J., & Gao, J. (2020). Generation Expansion Planning Considering the Output and Flexibility Requirement of Renewable Energy: The Case of Jiangsu Province. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 39.
20) Martins, F., Felgueiras, C., Smitkova, M., & Caetano, N. (2019). Analysis of fossil fuel energy consumption and environmental impacts in European countries. Energies, 12(6), 964
21) Pereira, S., Ferreira, P., & Vaz, A.I. (2017). Generation Expansion Planning with High Share of Renewables of Variable Output. Appl. Energy, 190, 1275–1288.
22) Pokale, W. K. (2012). Effects of Thermal Power Plant on Environment”¬ Scientific Reviews and Chemical Communications, 2(3), 212-215.
23) Republic of Kenya (2021). Least Cost Power Development Plan: Study Period 2021-2030. Available at: http://gak.co.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Updated-Least-Cost-Power-Development-Plan-2017-2022-min.pdf.
24) Rochedo, P.R.R., Soares-Filho, B., Schaeffer, R., Viola, E., Szklo, A., Lucena, A.F.P., Koberle, A., Davis, J.L., Rajão, R.& Rathmann, R. (2018). The Threat of Political Bargaining to Climate Mitigation in Brazil. Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 695–698.
25) Sovacool, B. K., Kim, J., & Yang, M. (2021). The hidden costs of energy and mobility: A global meta-analysis and research synthesis of electricity and transport externalities. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101885.
26) Streimikiene, D., Roos, I. & Rekis, J. (2021). External Cost of Electricity Generation in Baltic States. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 13, 863–870.
27) Štreimikienė, D. (2017). Review of internalization of externalities and dynamics of atmospheric emissions in energy sector of Baltic States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1131-1141
28) Srinivasan, P. & Shekhar, A. (2021). Internalizing the external cost of gaseous and particulate matter emissions from the coal-based thermal power plants in India, Particulate Science and Technology, 39:5, 632-640, DOI: 10.1080/02726351.2020.1815256
29) Sundaram, A.M. (2016). “Measurement of Externalities for Renewable Energy Investment.” Master thesis, Tecnico Lisboa, Lisboa.
30) Tang, B.J., Li, R., Li, X. Y. & Chen, H. (2017). An Optimal Production Planning Model of Coal-Fired Power Industry in China: Considering the Process of Closing down Inefficient Units and Developing CCS Technologies. Appl. Energy, 206, 519–530.
31) Varian, H.R. (1992). Microeconomic Analysis (3r d Edition). New York: Norton.
32) Zainal, K., Al-Madany, I., Al-Sayed, H., Khamis, A., Al Shuhaby, S., Al Hisaby, A., ... & Khalaf, E. (2012). The cumulative impacts of reclamation and dredging on the marine ecology and land-use in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Marine pollution bulletin, 64(7), 1452-1458.
