Sustainable Rural Development through Entrepreneurship: A Study on Start-Up Enterprises
1 Dr. P. Vidhya Priya, 2Dr. M. Mohanasundari
1Professor, Department of Management Studies, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai - 638060, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India
2Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai - 638060, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i3-36ABSTRACT:
This research explores the nexus between entrepreneurship and sustainable rural development, focusing on the role of start-up enterprises as catalysts for positive economic, social, and environmental change in rural communities. In an era where rural areas face numerous challenges, ranging from economic stagnation to environmental degradation, fostering entrepreneurship has emerged as a promising strategy for revitalizing these regions. This study employs a multi-disciplinary approach and delves into the entrepreneurial ecosystem, examining factors such as access to capital, education, infrastructure, and policy support that influence the success and sustainability of rural start-ups. It explores how start-up enterprises contribute to job creation, skill development, and empowerment of local communities, ultimately enhancing the overall quality of life in rural areas. Furthermore, the study assesses the environmental sustainability practices adopted by rural start-ups, considering their potential to mitigate ecological challenges and promote eco-friendly business models. Through empirical analysis, case studies, and interviews with entrepreneurs and community members, this research contributes valuable insights to academic discourse and policymaking. By shedding light on the intricate relationship between entrepreneurship and sustainable rural development, the findings aim to inform strategies that empower rural communities, promote economic resilience, and create a blueprint for fostering long-term, sustainable growth.
KEYWORDS:
Sustainable rural development, startup, enterprises, social entrepreneurship
REFERENCES:
1) Brünjes, J., & Diez, J. R. (2013). ‘Recession push’and ‘prosperity pull’entrepreneurship in a rural developing context. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3-4), 251-271.
2) Hart, D. M. (2008). The politics of “entrepreneurial” economic development policy of states in the US. Review of Policy Research, 25(2), 149-168.
3) Krishna, H. S. (2018). Entrepreneurial learning and Indian tech startup survival: An empirical investigation. Asian Journal of Innovation & Policy, 7(1).
4) Muñoz, P., & Kimmitt, J. (2019). Rural entrepreneurship in place: An integrated framework. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(9-10), 842-873.
5) Ramakrishna, G. N., & Rajanna, K. (2022). SUSTAINABLE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ECO-FRIENDLY ENTREPRENEURSHIP: AN OVERVIEW. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies (EBMS), 9(11), 130-135.
6) Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Hardy, D. (2015). Addressing poverty and inequality in the rural economy from a global perspective. Applied Geography, 61, 11-23.
7) Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business strategy and the environment, 20(4), 222-237.
8) Starchenko, L. V., Samusevych, Y. V., & Demchuk, K. (2021). Social and Eco-Friendly Enterpreneurship: The Keys to Sustainability.
9) Swinnen, J., & Squicciarini, P. (2012). Mixed messages on prices and food security. Science, 335(6067), 405-406.
10) Syam, A., Akib, H., Yunus, M., & Sitti Hasbiah, S. H. (2018). Determinants of entrepreneurship motivation for students at educational institution and education personnel in Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(2), 1-12.
11) Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development: Is it U-shaped?. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 167-237.
12) Westlund, H., & Bolton, R. (2003). Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 21, 77-113.