Navigating Sustainability Reporting Challenges in Pluralistic Societies: Insights from Balinese SMEs and the Integration of Tri Hita Karana and Tri Pramana
Gde Deny Larasdiputra
Warmadewa University, Terompong Street No.24, Denpasar City, Bali, Indonesia 80239
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i2-46ABSTRACT:
In pluralistic societies, navigating diverse perspectives and promoting sustainable practices pose significant challenges. This paper explores the complexities of sustainability reporting within organizations, focusing on the transition towards more mature and integrated approaches. Through qualitative research, we delve into the institutionalization of sustainability reporting, integration of innovative accounting technologies, and strategies to address challenges encountered in the reporting process. Key findings highlight the hurdles faced by Sustainability Reporting Managers, including limited experience, low external readership, and perceived redundancy by senior management. Furthermore, managers often confront constraints imposed by CEO reporting strategies, balancing the inclusion of positive narratives while maintaining sincerity in Sustainability Reports. Drawing from Balinese SMEs' experiences, we introduce the concepts of Tri Hita Karana and Tri Pramana as guiding principles for sustainable development. Tri Hita Karana emphasizes harmonious relationships with the divine, natural world, and community, while Tri Pramana focuses on leveraging human abilities for innovation and growth. Integrating these concepts into business practices promotes economic prosperity, environmental stewardship, and social well-being. In conclusion, this paper advocates for a multi-faceted approach to sustainable development, combining education, collaboration, and policy advocacy. By embracing cultural and spiritual values, organizations can foster a culture of sustainability and responsible entrepreneurship for the benefit of present and future generations.
KEYWORDS:
Sustainability challenges, Multi-faceted approach, Cultural and spiritual values
REFERENCES:
1) Aridiantari, P., Lasmawan, I. W., & Suastika, I. N. (2020). The Existence of Bali Aga Community Traditions and Culture in the Era of Globalization in Trunyan Village. Ganesha Civic Education Journal, 2(2), 67–80.
2) Bharati, K., and Kumar, D. (2020). A Report on National Seminar “Ecology, Environment and Religions: Key Issues and Challenges. Ecology, Economy and Society–the INSEE Journal 3 (1): 161–164. ISSN: 2581-6152 (print); 2581-6101 (web).
3) Brown, J. (2017). Democratizing Accounting: Reflections on The Politics of “Old” and “New” Pluralisms. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 43: 20–46.
4) Brown, J., and Tregidga, H. (2017). Re-politicizing Social and Environmental Accounting Through Rancière: On the value of dissensus. Accounting, Organizations and Society 61: 1–21.
5) Ernawi, I. S. (2009). Local Wisdom in a Spatial Planning Perspective. In R. Wikantiyoso, & P. Tutuko, Local Wisdom in Urban Planning and Design: To Create Sustainable Urban Architecture. Malang: Architectural & Urban Conservation Group.
6) Farooq, M.B. and De Villiers, C. (2019). Understanding How Managers Institutionalise Sustainability Reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(5), pp. 1240-1269.
7) Filho, L., Walter., Dahms, L. M., and Consorte-McCrea, A. (2019). Sustainability and Religion: Past Trends and Future Perspectives.” In Sustainability and the Humanities, edited by Walter Leal Filho and Adriana Consorte McCrea, 611–19. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95336-6_35.
8) Gottlieb, R. S. (2006). Introduction: Religion and Ecology—What Is the Connection and Why Does It Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178722.003.0001
9) Haribawa, P. A., Avenzora, R., and Arief, H. (2020). The Polarization of Orientation on Cultural Land Utilization for Ecotourism Development Amongst the Local in Bali Aga of Mount Lesung Region. Journal of Tropical Forest Management, 26(1), 21-33. EISSN: 2089-2063. ISSN: 2087-0469. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.26.1.21
10) Moerman, L., Murphy, D., Laan, S, V, D., and McGrath, D. (2023). Accounting and Accountability in Competing Worlds: An Overview, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 43:2, 95-104, DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2023.2233527
11) Perkiss, S and Tweedie, D. (2017) Social Accounting into Action: Religion as ‘Moral Source’, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37:3, 174-189, DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2017.1312473
12) Qodim, H. (2023). Nature Harmony and Local Wisdom: Exploring Tri Hita Karana and Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Bali Aga Community in Environmental Protection. Religious: Journal of Religious and Cross-Cultural Studies. 7(1). doi:10.15575/rjsalb.v7i1.24250. ISSN 2528-7249.
13) Sudarsana, I. G. (2002). "We Don't Live for This Life". Central Indonesian Hindu Dharma Parisada. Accessed 11 July 2021. Tri Pramana.
14) Usmani, M., Davison, J. and Napier, C.J. (2020). The Production of Stand-alone Sustainability Reports: Visual Impression Management, Legitimacy and “Functional Stupidity”. Accounting Forum, 44(4), pp. 315-343.
15) White, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155 (3767): 1203–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
16) Xinwu He. (2022). Sustainability Reporting: A Nuanced View of Challenges, Social and Environmental. Accountability Journal, 42:3, 240-243, DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2028736
