JEFMS Journal

Google Scholar

Article Pdf

---

ABSTRACT:

In this study, we investigate the influence of attitudes, behavior, and perceptions on the adoption of Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) payment systems among millennials, utilizing the Mobile Technology Acceptance Model (MTAM) approach. The sample consists of 100 respondents, and we apply both Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and MTAM to study about the relationships among the variables. The key findings are as follows: Positive attitudes towards QRIS significantly correlate with high behavioral intention, underscoring the pivotal role of attitudes in fostering adoption. Payment behavior has a significant effect on the perceived ease of use, highlighting the conduct of behavior in shaping perceptions of usability. Moreover, behavior also significantly influences the perceived usefulness, affirming the linkage between usage behavior and perceptions of benefit. Perceived ease of use positively correlates with attitudes, indicating that ease of use perceptions influence attitudes. Nevertheless, there is no significant support for the relationships between perceived security and attitudes, as well as between perceived usefulness and attitudes. These findings hold crucial implications for payment system providers and marketers in devising marketing strategies tailored to the preferences and expectations of millennials, while considering the aspects unveiled by the mobile technology acceptance model. Understanding the influences of attitudes, behavior, and perceptions on the adoption of modern payment systems becomes essential to meet user needs and integrate this technology into daily life effectively.

KEYWORDS:

QRIS payment systems, millennials, attitudes, behavior, perceptions, adoption, Mobile Technology Acceptance Model (MTAM)

REFERENCES:

1) Apjii. (2022). Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. apjii.or.id

2) Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00126

3) Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 351–370.

4) Danil, M. (2020). Pentingnya Memahami Peran Metodologi Studi Islam Terhadap Generasi Milenial Di Era Digitalisasi. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v21i2.13082

5) Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Management, Ph.D.(January 1985), 291. https://doi.org/oclc/56932490

6) de Luna, I. R., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2019). Mobile payment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146(August), 931–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.018

7) Gu, J.-C., Lee, S.-C., & Suh, Y. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 11605–11616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.024

8) Kim, C., Tao, W., Shin, N., & Kim, K. S. (2010). An empirical study of customers’ perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.04.014

9) Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4

10) Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003

11) Ooi, K.-B., & Tan, G. W.-H. (2016). Mobile technology acceptance model: An investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Systems with Applications, 59, 33–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.015

12) Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). 002224298504900403.Pdf. Journal of Marketing, 49(1979), 41–50.

13) Phan, K., & Daim, T. (2011). Exploring technology acceptance for mobile services. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n2.p339-360

14) Puspitasari, A. A., & Salehudin, I. (2022). Quick Response Indonesian Standard (QRIS): Does Government Support Contribute to Cashless Payment System Long-term Adoption? Journal of Marketing Innovation (JMI), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.35313/jmi.v2i1.29

15) Rafdinal, W., & Senalasari, W. (2021). Predicting the adoption of mobile payment applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(6), 984–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-10-2020-0532

16) Saputri, O. B. (2020). Preferensi Konsumen Dalam Menggunakan Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard (QRIS) Sebagai Alat Pembayaran Digital. Journals of Economics and Business Mulawarman, 17(2), 1–11.

17) Sayyida, S., & Alwiyah, A. (2018). Perkembangan Structural Equation Modeling (Sem) Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Bidang Ekonomi. PERFORMANCE: Jurnal Bisnis & Akuntansi, 8(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.24929/feb.v8i1.465

18) Taherdoost, H. (2019). What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 8(1), 2296–1747.

19) Yan, L. Y., Tan, G. W. H., Loh, X. M., Hew, J. J., & Ooi, K. B. (2021). QR code and mobile payment: The disruptive forces in retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58(September 2020), 102300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102300