JEFMS Journal

Google Scholar

Article Pdf

---

ABSTRACT:

Revenue from the taxation sector is the main pillar of state revenue in the State Budget (APBN). However, the Tax ratio, tax capacity, tax effort and tax bouyancy are still very low in Indonesia, indicating that taxpayer compliance behavior in Indonesia is also still very low. Policy is a challenge in efforts to optimize state revenue, especially tax revenue to improve compliance. By understanding the factors that influence compliance behavior, policy makers can develop stronger and more effective ways of dealing with compliance risks. Based on the problems studied, the study uses a qualitative research type. The qualitative approach concentrates more on interpretation and understanding. In terms of data collection and analysis, this approach is sensitive to the context that aims to holistically understand the problems being studied. Qualitative research aims to obtain and understand the meaning of a context in its natural setting and does not prioritize generalization. The results of the analysis show that all informants agree and agree that taxpayers have non-compliant behavior in carrying out their tax obligations. Informants interpret that being compliant can only be obtained from the character of taxpayers, internal factors. Then followed by the influence of external factors in the form of economic factors and the environment of Taxpayers. According to informants, most taxpayers are not compliant due to ignorance, it is very important to ensure that the right tax information according to taxpayers' needs is conveyed clearly by the tax authorities. Supervision from the tax authorities and law enforcement efforts from the tax authorities can encourage taxpayers to behave compliantly. Taxpayers who are already compliant expect service and convenience. Meanwhile, taxpayers who decide not to comply require extra supervision according to tax regulations. Compliance or non-compliance with tax regulations is the result of ongoing interaction between the tax authorities and taxpayers.

KEYWORDS:

Tax compliance, tax authorities, voluntary compliment, TPB, SSF

REFERENCES:

1) Abbas, M. H. I. (2017). Tax Evasion in Indonesia: A Game Theoretical Model. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 9(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.17977/um002v9i22017p191

2) Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

3) Alm, J., Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., Kogler, C., & Pollai, M. (2012). Rethinking the research paradigms for analysing tax compliance behaviour. CESifo Forum, 13(2), 33–40.

4) Alm, Sanchez, I., & De Juan, A. (1995). Alm et al 1999. In Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. (Vol. 48, pp. 3–3).

5) Ambarwati, R. D., & Liyana, N. F. (2020). Pengaruh Religiosity Dan Lingkungan Terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak Orang Pribadi Di Surabaya. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), 3(2), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v3i2.725

6) Amoh, J. K. (2019). an Estimation of the Taxable Capacity, Tax Effort and Tax Burden of an Emerging Economy: Evidence From Ghana. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(3), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.7549

7) Anciūtė, A., & Kropienė, R. (2010). the Model of Tax Evasion, Its Coherence To the Practical Tax Administration. Ekonomika, 89(4), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2010.0.966

8) Anggi, K., Dewi, S., Supadmi, N. L., & Wajib, K. (2022). Motivasi Pajak, Sanksi Pajak, dan Efektivitas E-Filing pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. 3306–3317.

9) Ardiani, N. L. G. D., & Sulfan. (2022). Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Umkm Di Kabupaten Badung Berdasarkan Persepsi Kepercayaan Wajib Pajak Dan Kekuasaan Otoritas Pajak. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 17(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v17i2.12509

10) Asqolani, A., & Sopian, S. (2021). Determinan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Pajak Bendahara Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 3(1), 209–219. a. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v3i1.1323

11) Aurelija, A., & Rūta, K. (2010). The model of tax evasion, its coherence to the practical tax administration. Ekonomika, 89(4), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2010.0.966

12) Badan Kebijakan Fiskal. (2021). Laporan Belanja Perpajakan Tahun 2020: Tax Expenditure Report 2020.

13) Braithwaite, V. (2017). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion, April, 15–40. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315241746-8

14) Bronewska, K. (2016). Cooperative compliance: A new approach to managing taxpayer relations. Amsterdam: IBFD Doctoral Series

15) Chongvilaivan, A., & Chooi, A. (2021). A comprehensive assessment of tax capacity in southeast asia. a. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS210243

16) Christian, F. F., & Aribowo, I. (2021). Pengawasan Kepatuhan Perpajakan Wajib Pajak Strategis Di Kpp Pratama Sukoharjo. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), 5(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v5i2.1320

17) Creswell W. John. 2013. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

18) Creswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd edn. California: Sage

19) Darma Wicaksana, I. G. P. A., & Supadmi, N. L. (2019). Pengaruh Kesadaran WP, Pelayanan Fiskus, Sanksi Pajak, dan Tax Amnesty Pada Kepatuhan WPOP. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 27, 2039. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v27.i03.p15

20) Darmayasa, I. N., Pariani, P. A. R., & Mandia, I. N. (2022). Moral pajak, pemeriksaan, sanksi, kepatuhan pajak umkm: peran moderasi kesadaran pajak. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara, 3(2), 316–330.

21) Davison, dkk. 2014. Psikologi Abnormal (diterjemahkan oleh Nurmalasari Fajar). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

22) Dewi, G. A. D. M., Budiartha, I. K., Hasibuan, H. T., & Sujana, I. K. (2022). The Effect of Taxpayer Awareness, Tax Services, Value Added Tax Understanding on Corporate Taxpayer Payment Compliance. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(4), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.4.1350

23) Fabiana Meijon Fadul. (2019). 済無No Title No Title No Title.

24) Fenochietto, R., & Pessino, C. (2013). Understanding Countries’ Tax Effort. IMF Working Papers, 13(244), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484301272.001

25) Fithria Marta, P. (2017). Pengaruh Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, Pemeriksaan Perpajakan, dan Transformasi Kelembagaan Direktorat Jendral Pajak Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak (Studi Pada Pegawai Pajak KPP Pratama dan KPP Madya di Wilayah Kerja DJP Bali). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

26) George, Jennifer and Gareth R Jones. (2012). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education, Inc, New Jersey

27) Gupta, S., & Jalles, J. T. (2022). Priorities for Strengthening Key Revenue Sources in Asia. April.

28) Hadi RAFSANJANI, A., & Agustina, N. (2022). Analysis of Local Tax Performance Through Tax Capacity and Tax Effort in Indonesia 2014-2018. Asian Journal of Business Environment, 12(4), 43–53. a. https://doi.org/10.13106/ajbe.2022.vol12.no2.43

29) Handoyo, R. D., Erlando, A., & Septiyanto, I. (2020). Dampak Faktor Eksternal Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. EcceS (Economics, Social, and Development Studies), 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24252/ecc.v7i1.13382

30) Ikwan Hi. Sambiu dan Yusdiana Amir. 2018. (2015a). Daftar Pustaka Daftar Pustaka.
Pemikiran Islam Di Malaysia: Sejarah Dan Aliran, 20(5), 40–43.
a. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=D9_YDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA369&lpg=PA369&dq=
Prawirohardjo,+Sarwono.+2010.+Buku+Acuan+Nasional+Pelayanan+Kesehatan++Maternal+dan+Neonatal.
+Jakarta+:+PT+Bina+Pustaka+Sarwono+Prawirohardjo.&source=bl&ots=riWNmMFyEq&sig=ACfU3U0HyN3I

31) Ikwan Hi. Sambiu dan Yusdiana Amir. 2018. (2015b). Daftar Pustaka Daftar Pustaka.
Pemikiran Islam Di Malaysia: Sejarah Dan Aliran, 20(5), 40–43.
a. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=D9_YDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA369&lpg=PA369&dq=Prawirohardjo,
+Sarwono.+2010.+Buku+Acuan+Nasional+Pelayanan+Kesehatan++Maternal+dan+Neonatal.
+Jakarta+:+PT+Bina+Pustaka+Sarwono+Prawirohardjo.&source=bl&ots=riWNmMFyEq&sig=ACfU3U0HyN3I

32) Jarvis. (2000). Physical Examination and Health Assessment. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company

33) John, C. W., & Kualitatif, P. (2014). DAFTAR PUSTAKA Creswell W. John. 2013. 2013.

34) Kadek, N., Disnayanti, A., & Dewi, I. G. A. A. P. (2019). E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana Moderasi Preferensi Risiko Pada Hubungan Kualitas Pelayanan Account Representative dan Kepatuhan WPOP Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Pendidikan Nasional ( Undiknas ), Bali , Indonesia PENDAHULUAN Sumber pene. 26, 1386–1411.

35) Kartono. (2006). Perilaku Manusia. ISBN. Jakarta

36) Kelompok, T. P., Dalam, P., Politik, D., Lunjen, K., Buntu, B., & Kabupaten, E. (2016). Studi Tentang Implementasi Subsidi Pupuk Di Kabupaten Ponorogo. Zuhelmy Riza. 2015–2016.

37) Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour, 1–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238

38) Kirchler, E. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

39) Kirchler, Erich, Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

40) Kogler, C. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010

41) Kompensasi, P., Internal, K., Balance, D. A. N. W., Employee, T., Serta, E., Terhadap, D., & Karyawan, K. (2016). Urika, 2016 PENGARUH KOMPENSASI, KOMUNIKASI INTERNAL DAN WORK-LIFE BALANCE TERHADAP EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SERTA DAMPAKNYA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu. 2012, 122–128.

42) Kuncoro, A. R. (2022). Tinjauan kepatuhan kewajiban pajak penghasilan umkm kuliner malam di wilayah kpp pratama madiun. 235–244.

43) La Kahija, Y. F. (2017). Penelitian fenomenologis. jalan memahami pengalaman hidup. Jogjakarta: Kanisius.

44) Laksono, K. P., & Widyawati, D. (2018). Efficiency Analysis of Indonesian Tax Offices: the Roles of Audit Effort And Community Education. Jurnal BPPK, 11 No.2, 61–74.

45) Le, T. M., Moreno-Dodson, B., & Bayraktar, N. (2012). Tax capacity and tax effort. In Policy Research Working Paper (Issue 6252).

46) Made Yoga Putra, N. & H. (2015). No TitleÉ?__. Ekp, 13(3), 1576–1580.

47) Mahasurya, I. G. N. A., & Budiartha, I. K. (2020). Religiusitas, Persepsi Korupsi Pajak Pelayanan Fiskus dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(11), 2713. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i11.p01

48) Manuaba, I. A. C. A., & Gayatri. (2017). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Pemahaman Peraturan Pajak, Pelayanan Fiskus, Persepsi Efektivitas Sistem Perpajakan Terhadap Kemauan Membayar Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana., 19(2), 1259–1289.

49) Merkusiwati, N. K. L. A., & Suaryana, I. G. N. A. (2021). Persepsi Wajib Pajak Mengenai Penggelapan Pajak, Keadilan Sistem Perpajakan Dan Tax Amnesty Pada Kepatuhan Perpajakan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(12), 3207. a. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2021.v31.i12.p13

50) Milgram, Stanley, (1963), Behavioral Study of Obodience, The Journal of Abnormal and Social, Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.

51) MISWAN, A. (2020). … Pemahaman Peraturan Perpajakan, Tarif Pajak, Sanksi Pajak, Dan Sosialisasi Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Umkm Di …. 2931–2943. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2022.v32.i10.p03

52) Miles, Mathew B., dan A. Michael Huberman. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

53) MUAFIAH, A. F. (2019). No TitleΕΛΕΝΗ. Αγαη, 8(5), 55.

54) Muehlbacher, S., Pickhardt, M., & Prinz, A. (2014). Introduction: Behavioral Dynamics of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40(February), iv–vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(13)00147-5

55) Nadiani Putri Utama, P., & Ery Setiawan, P. (2019). Pengaruh Dimensi Keadilan, Sosialisasi Pajak, Sanksi Pajak, Penghasilan Wajib Pajak dan Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan WPOP UMKM. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 28(2), 1550. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v28.i02.p28

56) Nugrahanto, A., & Andri Nasution, S. (2019). Pengaruh Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Badan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v1i1.607

57) OECD. (2022). Revenue Statistics in Asia and the Pacific: Papua New Guinea. OECD Tax Statistics (Database), 28. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/data/revenue-statistics-in-asia/papua-new-guinea_d2ecd822-en

58) Pajak, S. P., Pemerintah, T. B., Peningkatan, U., Pajak, K., Anbiya, F., Akuntansi, J., Ekonomi, F., Bisnis, D., & Brawijaya, U. (n.d.). Evaluasi Tingkat Kepatuhan Pajak di Indonesia dan Australia Ditinjau dari.

59) Pengembangan, H., Matematika, K., & Kelas, D. (2012). DAFTAR PUSTAKA Ahmad, Lif Khoiru.2011. 2009–2011.

60) Permana, I., & Sisdyani, E. A. (2022). Kepribadian Wajib Pajak, Pelayanan Fiskus, Sanksi Pajak dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(5), 1213. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2022.v32.i05.p08

61) Pokropski, M. (2020). Phenomenology and functional analysis. A functionalist reading of Husserlian phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(5), 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09694-y

62) Prasetyo, K. A. (2017). Tax Compliance: An Experimental Approach. 1(1), 27–38.

63) Primadina, N. (2019). Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga. Toleransi Masyarakat Beda Agama, 30(28), 5053156. https://repository.unair.ac.id/81796/3/JURNAL_Fis.P.06 19 Naf d.pdf

64) Putra Pranata, I. G. B., & Jati, I. K. (2019). Pengaruh Sanksi Pajak dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 29(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v29.i01.p11

65) Poesprodjo. (1987). Pengertian Pengetahuan Memahami. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

66) Ratmono, D. (2014). 4212-6302-1-Pb. Jaai, 18 no. 1.

67) Republik Indonesia. 2009. Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan keempat atas Undang-undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan.

68) Ryan, Cooper, & Tauer. (2013). Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 0(0), 12–26.

69) Saeroji, O. (2019). Menakar kadar kepatuhan wajib pajak. Retrieved from https://www.pajak.go.id/: https://www.pajak.go.id/id/artikel/menakar-kadar-kepatuhan-wajib-pajak

70) Sani, P. J., & Sulfan, S. (2022). Perilaku Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pekerjaan Bebas Di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 3(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v3i2.1520

71) Saputra, K. E. (n.d.). Fiscuss and Tax Consultant’S Understanding of Taxpayers Behaviour: a Phenomenological Study. www.pajak.go.id

72) Sloan, A. & Bowe, B. (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: the philosophy, the methodologies and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigage lecturers' experiences of curriculum design. Quality & Quantity, 48(3) 1291-1303.

73) Suardana, K. P., & Gayatri, G. (2020). Pengaruh Sosialisasi Perpajakan, Pengetahuan Perpajakan dan Perhitungan Tarif Pajak pada Kepatuhan Pajak Mahasiswa Pelaku UMKM. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(9), 2311. a. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i09.p11

74) Sudijono, Anas. (2011). Evaluasi Pedidikan. Jakarta; Raja Grafindo Persada

75) Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

76) Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung:Alfabeta

77) Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung:Alfabeta

78) Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung:Alfabeta

79) Sulistomo, A., & Prastiwi, A. (2012). Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Terhadap Pengungkapan Kecurangan (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi UNDIP Dan UGM). Jurnal Akmal Sulistomo, 1–28 a. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/35767/1/Jurnal_Akmal_Sulistomo_C2C008160.pdf

80) Utomo, S. T., & Nurhidayati, N. (2022). Determinan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Bendahara Desa: Studi Empiris pada Wilayah KPP Pratama Klaten. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 4(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v4i1.1311

81) Walsh, K. (2012). Understanding taxpayer behaviour - new opportunities for tax administration. Economic and Social Review, 43(3), 451–475.

82) Wardiah, M. L. (2016). Teori Perilaku dan Budaya Organisasi. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

83) Yoda Mustikasasti, E., & Usman, F. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dengan Peredaran Bruto Tertentu Melalui Pendekatan Perilaku. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 1(1), 12. a. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v1i1.595

84) Yunika Antari, N. L. P., & Supadmi, N. L. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan Modern, Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak Pada Kepatuhan WPOP. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(28), 221. a. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v26.i01.p09

85) Zainudin, F. M., Nugroho, R., & Muamarah, H. S. (2022). Pengaruh Kepercayaan Kepada Pemerintah Terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak Dengan Persepsi Keadilan Pajak Sebagai Variabel Intervening. JURNAL PAJAK INDONESIA (Indonesian Tax Review), 6(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v6i1.1616