JEFMS Journal

Google Scholar

Article Pdf

---

ABSTRACT:

This study aims to determine how the role and understanding of village officials influence the accountability of village fund management. This study also wants to see agency problems in the accountability of village fund management. The results of this study are the role of village officials has a variable significance level of 0.03 0.05, which means that the role of village officials has a positive and significant effect on the accountability of village fund management. Furthermore, the understanding of village officials has a variable significance level of 0.02 0.05, which means that the understanding of village officials has a positive and significant effect on the accountability of village fund management. Based on the results of interviews with village officials, agency theory in village fund management is very important to ensure accountability and transparency or openness. The community as a principal must obtain clear information and have a role in supervision, while the village government as an agent is required to carry out its duties transparently and responsibly. With both formal and informal monitoring mechanisms in place, potential conflicts of interest and moral hazard issues can be minimised.

KEYWORDS:

Agency Theory, Role of Village Officials, Understanding of Village Officials, Village Fund Management Accountability

REFERENCES:

1) Akib, M. D. (2017). Peran Perangkat Desa dalam Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Studi pada Desa Pudaria Jaya Kecamatan Moramo). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(1), 41–43.

2) Ali, C. Ben. (2020). Agency Theory and Fraud. Corporate Fraud Exposed, 1976, 149–167.

3) Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

4) Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Wiseman, R. M. (2012). Has Agency Theory Run its Course?: Making the Theory more Flexible to Inform the Management of Reward Systems. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(6), 526–546.

5) Dzulkifli, M., Furqan, A. C., & Betty, B. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Terhadap Efektivitas Pengelolaan Dana Bencana. Jurnal Akuntansi Manado (JAIM), 9–18.

6) Harahap, W. S. M., & Wirananda, H. A. (2023). The Effect Of Community Participation, Transfotmational Leadership And Internal Control Systems On Accountability Financial Management Of Village Funds In Labu Beach District Village Deli Serdang. International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 4(1), 73–91.

7) Kurniawan, G. P., Shalikhah, S. Z., Shofiat, H., Azizah, N. N., & Mahmud Mochtar. (2021). Jurnal Tana Mana. Jurnal Tana Mana, 2(1), 46–48.

8) Kusmanto, H., Ekayanta, F. B., & Bahri, S. (2022). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Demokratisasi dan Desentralisasi di Indonesia. Langgas: Jurnal Studi Pembangunan, 1(1), 9–17.

9) Löhde, A. S. K., Campopiano, G., & Calabrò, A. (2021). Beyond agency and stewardship theory: shareholder– manager relationships and governance structures in family firms. Management Decision, 59(2), 390–405.

10) Putri, I. M.;Ratnawati D. (2020). Nusantara ( Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial ) JEPANG. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 7(2), 408–420.

11) Rangkuti, L. E., & Novasari, D. (2019). Peran Perangkat Desa Dalam Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa (Studi Pada Desa Melati Ii Kecamatan Perbaungan). Wahana Inovasi, 8(2), 185–187.

12) Setiana, N. D., & Yuliani, N. L. (2017). Pengaruh Pemahaman dan Peran Perangkat Desa Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. University Reseach Colloquim, 5, 205–210.

13) Solikhin, A. (2017). Menimbang Pentingnya Desentralisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 2(1). Sonbay, Y. Y. (2022). Kritik Terhadap Pemberlakuan Teori Agensi Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa Di Suku Boti.

14) EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 6(2).

15) Steinle, C., Schiele, H., & Ernst, T. (2014). Information Asymmetries as Antecedents of Opportunism in Buyer- Supplier Relationships: Testing Principal-Agent Theory. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 21(2), 123–140.

16) Sugiyono. (2019). Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Dan R&D. ALFABETA.

17) Scott, W.R. (2003). Financial Accounting Theory, 3rd edition. United States ofAmerica: Prentice Hall. Sedarmayanti. (2004). Good Governance (Kepemerintahan yang Baik) Bagian Kedua: Membangun Manajemen

18) Sistem Kinerja Guna Meningkatkan Produktivitas Menuju Good Governance (Kepemerintahan yang Baik).

19) Bandung: Mandar Maju.

20) Setiana, N.D., dan Yuliani, N.L. (2017). Pengaruh Pemahaman dan Peran Perangkat Desa Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. The 6th University Research Colloquium 2017 Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang.

21) Soekanto, S. (2002). Teori Peranan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

22) Soetrisno, L. (1995). Menuju Masyarakat Partisipatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Sudaryono. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

23) Sudijono, A. (2009). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo. Sujarweni, V.W. (2015). Akuntansi Desa: Panduan Tata Kelola Keuangan Desa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

24) Sutermeister, A.R. (1976). People abd Productivity. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc Thoha, M. (2003). Birokrasi dan Politik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

25) Ulum, I. (2005). Akuntansi Sektor Publik Sebuah Pengantar. Malang: UMMPress.

26) Umaira, S., dan Adnan. (2019). Pengaruh Partisipasi Masyarakat, Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia dan Pengawasan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Studi Kasus pada Kabupaten Aceh Barat Daya). Skripsi: Universitas Syiah Kuala.

27) United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2009). What is Good Governance?. Bangkok: PovertyReduction Section UNESCAP.

28) Waladiyah, U. (2018). Pengaruh Kepatuhan Atas Perundang-undangan, Kompetensi Pemerintah Desa dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Skripsi, Palembang: Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya