JEFMS Journal

Google Scholar

Article Pdf

---

ABSTRACT:

The purpose of this study is to introduce a new concept which is the integration of Self-efficacy theory and uluhiyah values which are derived from Islamic values, namely uluhiyah Remote working. Self-efficacy emphasizes a person's belief in his ability to exercise control over his own functioning and over the events that affect his life. Meanwhile, Uluhiyah has the meaning of being confident in one's abilities, trying and relying only on Allah SWT, so that URW is defined as belief in one's ability to work remotely to achieve work performance with confidence in involvement, help and success solely from Allah SWT. Embodied in Uluhiyah's concept of self-efficacy include: The newly developed measures presented in this article's contribution are framed in major competency categories with 8 dimensions for scale development, It is based on the premise that, when working remotely, employees need: technology skills (E-skills), Trust building skills (Trust competency)), Remote social skills (Remote social skills (Social & Relational Competency)), Remote emotional skills (Emotional Competency)), One's belief in Allah and his hope for the grace of His help, the involvement of Allah in human endeavors, and success that comes solely from Allah SWT.

KEYWORDS:

Self efficacy theory, Uluhiyah, Organizational performance

REFERENCES:

1) Boohene, R., & Asuinura, E. L. (2010). The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Corporate Performance: A Study of Graphic Communications Group Limited. International Business Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n1p266

2) Cramer, R. J., Neal, T. M. S., & Brodsky, S. L. (2009). Self-Efficacy and Confidence: Theoretical Distinctions and Implications for Trial Consultation. Consulting Psychology Journal, 61(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017310

3) European Union. (2020). Telework in the EU before and after the COVID-19: where we were , where we head to. Science for Policy Briefs, 2009, 1–8. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/jrc120945_policy_brief_-_covid_and_telework_final.pdf

4) Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992a). Gits, Mitchell - 1992 - Self-efficacy A theortical analysis of its determinants and malleability.pdf. In Academic of Management Review (Vol. 17, Issue 211, pp. 183–21).

5) Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992b). Selbstwirksamkeit: Eine theoretische Analyse ihrer Determinanten und Formbarkeit. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.

6) Grant, N., Clarke, A., & Solutions, E. (2020). Applying Passivhaus Experience to Archive Buildings. 2019–2020.

7) Gupta, J. D. N. (2016). Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance , 1 (1): Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(3), 261–280.

8) Noornajihan. (2014). Efikasi Kendiri: Perbandingan Antara Islam dan Barat Self Efficacy: A Comparison Between Islam and West. Global Journal of Al Thaqafah, 4(2), 89–98. www.gjat.my

9) Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., & Bisello, M. (2020). At Io No Ur.

10) Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., Fernandez-Macías, E., & Bisello, M. (2020). Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? 74. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc

11) Tramontano, C., Grant, C., & Clarke, C. (2021). Development and validation of the e-Work Self-Efficacy Scale to assess digital competencies in remote working. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100129

12) Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management special issue: theory development forum Dynamic Personality View project. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384. http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

13) Zulkosky, K. (2009). Self-Efficacy: A Concept Analysis. Nursing Forum, 44(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2009.00132.x