Sustainability Reporting on Financial Performance, the Role of CSR Committee, Evidence from Indonesia
1Herman Paleni, 2Ridwan Nurazi, 3Dewi Rahmayanti
1,2,3Faculty of Economics and Business, Bengkulu University, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i1-42ABSTRACT:
Companies in running their business compete to improve their respective performance reporting. ESG issues have gained considerable attention as companies increasingly focus on disclosing both financial and non-financial information. This research aims to assess the partial and simultaneous impact of ESG performance on Return on Assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q, with moderation by the CSR committee. Disclosure information and financial data for companies in the energy sector in Indonesia were sourced from financial reports and sustainability reports. encompassing a total of 78 companies period the years 2013 to 2022. After applying criteria for companies disclosing ESG information, a subset of 43 companies was identified. Using Chow test, Lagrange, and Hausman tests before moderation, followed by tests after moderation by the CSR committee using STATA. The research finding, before moderation by the CSR committee, revealed that ESG performance had a positive and significant impact on ROA, while its effect on Tobin's Q was negative and insignificant. Then moderation by the CSR committee, indicated that the presence of a CSR committee positively moderated the impact of ESG performance on ROA and Tobin’ Q, albeit insignificantly. Further examinations post-moderation revealed that the presence of a CSR committee does not exert a significant moderating effect. Consequently, within energy sector companies, the CSR committee seems to serve as a symbolic tool, implying the company's adherence to proper operational practices without significantly altering the impact of ESG performance.
KEYWORDS:
ROA, Tobin's Q, CSR Committee, Environmental, Social, Governance Performance.
REFERENCES:
1) AlAjmi, J., Buallay, A., & Saudagaran, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and banks’ performance: the role of economic performance and institutional quality. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2020-0757
2) Alazzani, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., & Jones, M. (2019). Muslim CEO, women on boards and corporate responsibility reporting: some evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(2), 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2017-0002
3) Al-Haddad, L. M., Saidat, Z., Seaman, C., & Gerged, A. M. (2023). Does capital structure matter? Evidence from family-owned firms in Jordan. Journal of Family Business Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2022-0115
4) Alsayegh, M. F., Rahman, R. A., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
5) Amran, A., Lee, S., & Devi, S. (2013). Amran, A., Lee, S. P. and S.Susela Devi (2013), The Influence of Governance Structure and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Sustainability Reporting Quality. Bus. Strat. Env. Business Strategy and the Environment, early view. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767.
6) Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The Influence of Governance Structure and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Sustainability Reporting Quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
7) Arayssi, M., & Jizi, M. (2023). Royal family board directors and the level of ESG disclosures in GCC listed firms. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2022-0123
8) Atu, O.-E., & Osaretin, K. (2013). Triple Bottom Line Accounting: A Conceptual Expose (Vol. 13, Issue 4). www.iosrjournals.orgwww.iosrjournals.org
9) Baraibar-Diez, E., & Odriozola, M. D. (2019). CSR committees and their effect on ESG performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185077
10) Baraibar-Diez, E., Odriozola, M. D., & Fernández Sánchez, J. L. (2019). Sustainable compensation policies and its effect on environmental, social, and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1760
11) Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791
12) Beleneși, M., Bogdan, V., & Popa, D. N. (2021). Disclosure dynamics and non-financial reporting analysis. The case of romanian listed companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094732
13) Bifulco, G. M., Savio, R., Paolone, F., & Tiscini, R. (2023). The CSR committee as moderator for the ESG score and market value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 3231–3241. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2549
14) Biswas, P. K., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2018). Board composition, sustainability committee and corporate social and environmental performance in Australia. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(4), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-12-2017-0107
15) Buallay, A. (2020). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371
16) Carmo, C., Correia, I., Leite, J., & Carvalho, A. (2023). Towards the Voluntary Adoption of Integrated Reporting: Drivers, Barriers, and Practices. Administrative Sciences, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13060148
17) Čater, T., Čater, B., Milić, P., & Žabkar, V. (2023). Drivers of corporate environmental and social responsibility practices: A comparison of two moderated mediation models. Journal of Business Research, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113652
18) Celentano, A., Lepore, L., Pisano, S., D’Amore, G., & Alvino, F. (2020). The joint effect of board independence and CSR committee on CSR disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 17(4, Special Issue), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i4siart9
19) Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Woo, H. S., & Semadeni, M. (2016). Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2639–2657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475
20) Daniel-Vasconcelos, V., Ribeiro, M. de S., & Crisóstomo, V. L. (2022). Does gender diversity moderate the relationship between CSR committees and Sustainable Development Goals disclosure? Evidence from Latin American companies. RAUSP Management Journal, 57(4), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-02-2022-0063
21) Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting.
22) Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307–2329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
23) Dkhili, H. (2023). Does environmental, social and governance (ESG) affect market performance? The moderating role of competitive advantage. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-10-2022-0149
24) Eccles, R., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The Impact of Corporate Culture of Sustainability on Corporate Behavior and Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1964011
25) Endrikat, J., de Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. (2021). Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Business and Society, 60(8), 2099–2135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320930638
26) Freeman, R. (2004). The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. Zeitschrift Für Wirtschafts- Und Unternehmensethik, 5. https://doi.org/10.5771/1439-880X-2004-3-228
27) García-Sánchez, I. M., Gómez-Miranda, M. E., David, F., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2019). The explanatory effect of CSR committee and assurance services on the adoption of the IFC performance standards, as a means of enhancing corporate transparency. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(5), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2018-0261
28) Giannopoulos, G., Kihle Fagernes, R. V., Elmarzouky, M., & Afzal Hossain, K. A. B. M. (2022). The ESG Disclosure and the Financial Performance of Norwegian Listed Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(6), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060237
29) Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
30) Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Voluntary disclosure theory and financial control variables: An assessment of recent environmental disclosure research. Accounting Forum, 36(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.03.002
31) Gull, A. A., Ahsan, T., Qureshi, M. A., & Mushtaq, R. (2023). Striving to safeguard shareholders or maintain sustainability in periods of high uncertainty: A multi-country evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122183
32) Hanafi, M. M., Setiyono, B., & Sanjaya, I. P. S. (2018). Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from the subprime crisis period. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2016-0203
33) Hapsoro, D., & Fadhilla, A. (2017). Relationship Analysis of Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Economic Consequences: Empirical Study of Indonesia Capital Market. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 11. https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v11i2.8526
34) Huang, D. Z. X. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: a review and consolidation. Accounting and Finance, 61(1), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12569
35) Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
36) Kent, P., & Ung, K. (2003). Voluntary Disclosure of Forward-Looking Earnings Information in Australia. In © The Australian Graduate School of Management AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (Vol. 28, Issue 3).
37) Kim, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Understanding the impact of esg practices in corporate finance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073746
38) Lee, S. M., Kim, S. T., & Choi, D. (2012). Green supply chain management and organizational performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(8), 1148–1180. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571211264609
39) Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
40) Liu, G., & Sun, J. (2010). Ultimate ownership structure and corporate disclosure quality: evidence from China. Managerial Finance, 36(5), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351011039409
41) Lu, Y., Abeysekera, I., & Cortese, C. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting quality, board characteristics and corporate social reputation: Evidence from China. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2012-0053
42) Martínez-Climent, C., Zorio grima, A., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2018). Financial return crowdfunding: literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0511-x
43) Morioka, S. N., Evans, S., & Carvalho, M. M. De. (2016). Sustainable Business Model Innovation: Exploring Evidences in Sustainability Reporting. Procedia CIRP, 40, 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.151
44) Nishitani, K., Unerman, J., & Kokubu, K. (2021). Motivations for voluntary corporate adoption of integrated reporting: A novel context for comparing voluntary disclosure and legitimacy theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129027
45) Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019
46) Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004
47) Popa, D. N., Bogdan, V., Sabau Popa, C. D., Belenesi, M., & Badulescu, A. (2021). Performance mapping in two-step cluster analysis through ESEG disclosures and EPS. Kybernetes, 51(13), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2021-0672
48) Qiu, S. (Charles), Jiang, J., Liu, X., Chen, M. H., & Yuan, X. (2021). Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during the COVID-19 pandemic? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102759
49) Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
50) Rau, P. R., & Yu, T. (2023). A survey on ESG: investors, institutions and firms. In China Finance Review International. Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-12-2022-0260
51) Ren, C., Ting, I. W. K., Lu, W.-M., & Kweh, Q. L. (2022). Nonlinear effects of ESG on energy-adjusted firm efficiency: Evidence from the stakeholder engagement of apple incorporated. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2266
52) Rezaee, Z. (2017). Voluntary disclosure of non-financial information and its association with sustainability performance. Advances in Accounting, 39, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.08.001
53) Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
54) Saeed, A., Noreen, U., Azam, A., & Tahir, M. S. (2021). Does csr governance improve social sustainability and reduce the carbon footprint: International evidence from the energy sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073596
55) Saini, N., & Singhania, M. (2019). Performance relevance of environmental and social disclosures: The role of foreign ownership. Benchmarking, 26(6), 1845–1873. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2018-0114
56) Sánchez-Infante Hernández, J. P., Yañez-Araque, B., & Moreno-García, J. (2020). Moderating effect of firm size on the influence of corporate social responsibility in the economic performance of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119774
57) Sebrina, N., Taqwa, S., Afriyenti, M., & Septiari, D. (2023). Analysis of sustainability reporting quality and corporate social responsibility on companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2157975
58) Sektor Energi – LCDI. (2020).
59) Shobhwani, K., & Lodha, S. (2023). Impact of ESG Risk Scores on Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis of NSE-100 Companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 19(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X231170910
60) Silveira, G., & Slack, N. (2001). Exploring the trade-off concept. In International Journal of Operations & Production Management (Vol. 21, Issue 7). # MCB University Press. http://www.emerald-library.com/ft
61) Subramanyam, K. R. and J. J. W. (2017). Financial Report Analysis Book 3. Translated by Dewi Yanti. Salemba Empat.
62) Usman, B., Nurazi, R., Zoraya, I., & Aziza, N. (2023). CSR Performance and Profitability of the Banking Industry in Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN). In Capital Markets Review (Vol. 31, Issue 2). https://www.mfa.com.my/cmr/v31_i2_a3/
63) Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2017). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications. Journal of Management Control, 28(3), 275–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-016-0235-4
64) Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2020). Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings. Journal of Management Control, 31(4), 333–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00308-x
65) Vishwanathan, P., van Oosterhout, H., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Duran, P., & van Essen, M. (2020). Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 314–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12514
66) Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
67) Wolfolds, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2019). Misaccounting for endogeneity: The peril of relying on the Heckman two-step method without a valid instrument. Strategic Management Journal, 40(3), 432–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2995
68) Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
69) Zhang, F., Qin, X., & Liu, L. (2020). The interaction effect between ESG and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051866
70) Zhang, Q., Loh, L., & Wu, W. (2020). How do environmental, social and governance initiatives affect innovative performance for corporate sustainability? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083380