Socio-Economic Impacts of (CPEC) at Small Level Businessmen. A Case Study of Lahore’s Four Markets, Pakistan
1Ghulam Shabbir, 2Dr. Jianfu Ma
1PhD Scholar, Ethno Sociology Department, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China, 750021.
2Professor of Anthropology, Pakistan study center, North Minzo University, Ningxia, China.750021.
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i1-21
ABSTRACT:
Purpose:
identify the development of projects which are working with CPEC and small level businessmen are getting positive or negative benefits from these projects. Their social status and culture remained in good way or negative way. This study find out the problems and hurdles which normally businessmen are facing and solutions to overcome of the hurdles which can become the solution of CPEC completion.
Design/ Methodology/ Approach:
in this study quantitative and qualitative designed were implemented and convenient sampling techniques was used from the concerning region. A semi-structured in depth interview was conducted with small level businessmen directly concern with CPEC projects. Researcher used thematic analysis and structured questionnaire with required respondents who were directly affected from CPEC projects. A total 500 respondents were chosen and convenience sampling approach was used with different types of small level of businessmen.
Findings:
research explained the knowledge of respondents about CPEC (86.4%) was aware and only (13.6%) respondents were not known to CPEC projects. Study also explored that total 500 respondents from which 382(76.4%) purchasing Chinese products while only 118(23.6) were not purchasing Chinese products. Social, cultural and economic impacts were seen in positive direction which small level of businessmen perceiving and expecting. Small level businessmen were mostly exploited from big stakeholders and governments taxes implementations.
Implications /Value/Originality:
This is the facts CPEC and its projects are for the welfare of society. Small level businessmen cannot ignore there, their participation in these projects should be compulsory because mostly small level business were observed in markets. Local community and their cultural values are their identity which should maintain on every condition. Both side governments and policy makers should so assign the projects accordingly the socio-economic status of all nationals
KEYWORDS:
development of CPEC, Socio-economic impacts, small level businessmen, social values
REFERENCES:
1) Abid, M., & Ashfaq, A. (2015). CPEC: Abid, M., & Ashfaq, A. (2015). CPEC: Challenges and Opportunities for Pakistan. Pakistan Vision, 16(2). Challenges and Opportunities for Pakistan. Pakistan Vision, 16(2).
2) Ahmad, M. (2017). "New great game and the CPEC in Baluchistan: Opportunities and challenges. Pakistan Journal of History and Culture 38(1): 83-108.
3) Ahmad, R.; Mi, H.; Fernald, L.W. Revisiting the potential security threats linked with the China—Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). J. Int. Counc. Small Bus. 2020, 1, 64–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4) Ahmed, R., & Mustafa, U. (2016). Impact of CPEC projects on agriculture sector of Pakistan: Infrastructure and agricultural output linkages. The Pakistan Development Review, 511-527.
5) Ali, L.; Mi, J.; Shah, M.; Khan, A.; Imran, M. Transport culture akin to the China-Pakistan economic corridor. Hum. Syst. Manag. 2017, 36, 381–396. [CrossRef]
6) Ali, L.; Mi, J.; Shah, M.; Shah, S.J.; Khan, S.; Ullah, R.; Bibi, K. Local residents’ attitude towards road and transport infrastructure (a case of China Pakistan economic corridor). J. Chin. Econ. Foreign Trade Stud. 2018, 11, 104–120. [CrossRef]
7) Ali, L.; Mi, J.; Shah, M.; Syed, S.J.; Khan, S.; Bibi, K. The Potential Socio-Economic Impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor. Asian Dev. Policy Rev. 2017, 5, 191–198. [CrossRef]
8) Ali, M. Pakistan’s quest for coal-based energy under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Implications for the environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 31935–31937. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9) Ali, S. (2016, August 27). CPEC to help overcome energy crisis in Pakistan: Moody’s. Retrieved November 5, 2016, fromhttps://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/business/cpec-to-help-overcome-energy-crisis-in-pakistanmoody/.
10) Aqeel, M. (2016) Impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor. Unpublished Degree Thesis, BBA International Business, ARCADA.7(3): 63-80.
11) Asif, M.; Ling, Y.B. China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): International Media Reporting and Legal Validity of GilgitBaltistan. Asian Soc. Sci. 2019, 15. [CrossRef]
12) Asomani-Boateng, R.; Fricano, R.J.; Adarkwa, F. Assessing the socio-economic impacts of rural road improvements in Ghana: A case study of Transport Sector Program Support (II). Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2015, 3, 355–366. [CrossRef]
13) Awais, M., Samin, T., Gulzar, M. A., & Hwang, J. (2019). The sustainable development of the China Pakistan economic corridor: Synergy among economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 11(24), 7044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247044.
14) Aziz, I., Raza, S., Bhatti, M. K. L., Ali, S., & Tahir, W. (2020). China Pakistan Economic Corridor energy projects in light of sustainable development. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(2), -125.
15) Cheng, L.K. Three questions on China’s “belt and road initiative”. China Econ. Rev. 2016, 40, 309–313. [CrossRef]
16) Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: Sage.
17) Cleland, D., Gareis, R. (2006). Global Project Management Handbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Print.
18) D. Tynan, Who’s the Big Winner in the NDN Sweepstakes, www.eurasianet.org (accessed December 31, 2013)
19) Das, K.C. The making of one belt, one road and dilemmas in South Asia. China Rep. 2017, 53, 125–142. [CrossRef]
20) Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success, International Journal of Project Management 32, 189–201
21) Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22) Govt of Pakistan, 2019. Impact of CPEC for Pakistan. http://cpec.gov.pk.
23) Habib, S, Fazal, R. Farkhanda, J. and Adeel, K. (2015) Assessing Ex-ante Socioeconomic Impact of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Across the Zone of Influence. Proceedings of International Conference on CPEC, GC University, Lahore. December 09-10.
24) Haq, R.; Farooq, N. Impact of CPEC on social welfare in Pakistan: A district level analysis. In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the Pakistan Society of Development Economists, Islamabad, Pakistan, 13–15 December 2016; pp. 597–618.
25) Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage.
26) Homans, G.C. Social Behaviour as Exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 1958, 63. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1086/222355 (accessed on 1 January 2021).
27) Howard, W. and Edoardo, M. (2004) Books, buildings, and learning outcomes: An impact evaluation of World Bank support to basic education in Ghana (Washington DC: World Bank, 2004).
28) Iftikhar, Z. (2020). China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): analyzing interests, challenges and impacts on Pakistan (2015-2019) [Master’s thesis, International Islamic University Malaysia].
29) Ijaz, A. (2015). Significance of Gwadar Port. http://compru.gob.pk/report.cpec-pdf.
30) Institute of Engineers. (2017). CPEC Seminar 29th March 2017. http://cpec.gov.pk.
31) Iqbal, K. Securing CPEC: Challenges, responses and outcomes. In Securing the Belt and Road Initiative; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 197–214.
32) Ishaque, B. W. (2016). China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Prospects, challenges, and way forward. NDU Journal, 30, 1.
33) Javaid, U.; Jahangir, A. Pakistan-China strategic relationship: A glorious journey of 55 years. J. Res. Soc. Pak. 2015, 52, 157–183.
34) Jurowski, C.A. The Interplay of Elements Affecting Host Community Resident Attitudes toward Tourism: A Path Analytic Approach; Virginia Tech: Blacksburg, VA, USA, 1994.
35) K. Khan, S. Anwar, Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and CPEC: Background, Challenges and Strategies, (2016) Retrieved from www.pide.org.pk/psde/pdf/ AGM32/papers/Special%20Economic%20Zones.pdf.
36) Kanwal, S.; Pitafi, A.H.; Rasheed, M.I.; Pitafi, A.; Iqbal, J. Assessment of residents’ perceptions and support toward development projects: A study of the China—Pakistan Economic Corridor. Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 1–17. [CrossRef]
37) McCartney M, 2018. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Considering Contemporary Pakistan through Old-Fashioned Economics and Historical Case Studies. Vl, 23, p 19-48.
38) McCartney, M. (2022). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Infrastructure, social savings, spillovers, and economic growth in Pakistan. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 63(2), 180-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15387216.2020.1836986.
39) McCartney, M. (2022). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Infrastructure, social savings, spillovers, and economic growth in Pakistan. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 63(2), 180-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15387216.2020.1836986.
40) McGehee, N.G.; Andereck, K.L. Factors predicting rural residents’ support of tourism. J. Travel Res. 2004, 43, 131–140. [CrossRef]
41) Naz, L., Ali, A., & Fatima, A. (2018). International competitiveness and ex-ante treatment effects of CPEC on household welfare in Pakistan. International Journal of Development Issues, 17(2), 168-186. https://doi.org/10. 1108/IJDI-05-2017-0100 .
42) Normal K. Denzin, 1978. The research act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods; Edition, 2.
43) Nunkoo, R.; Gursoy, D. Residents’ support for tourism: An identity perspective. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 243–268. [CrossRef]
44) Park, D.-B.; Nunkoo, R.; Yoon, Y.-S. Rural residents’ attitudes to tourism and the moderating effects of social capital. Tour. Geogr. 2015, 17, 112–133. [CrossRef]
45) Peters, M.; Chan, C.-S.; Legerer, A. Local perception of impact-attitudes-actions towards tourism development in the Urlaubsregion Murtal in Austria. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2360. [CrossRef]
46) Rafiq, M.; Weiwei, W. Managerial trust outlook in China and Pakistan. Hum. Syst. Manag. 2017, 36, 363–368. [CrossRef]
47) Ruilian Zhang, Guoqing Shi, Yuanni Wang, Si Zhao, Shafiq Ahmad, Xiaochen Zhang & Qucheng Deng, 2018. Social impact assessment of investment activities in the China–Pakistan economic corridor.
48) Sial, S. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: An assessment of potential threats and constraints. Confl. Peace Stud. 2014, 6, 24. [Google Scholar]
49) Zhang, R.; Shi, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ahmad, S.; Zhang, X.; Deng, Q. Social impact assessment of investment activities in the China—Pakistan economic corridor. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2018, 36, 331–347. [CrossRef].