Connection Between the Audit Characteristics and Corporate ESG Performance in Indonesia
1Dwi Narullia, 2Dhika Maha Putri, 3Yongky Teguh Setiaji, 4Nurman Fadhilah
1,2,3,4Universitas Negeri Malang
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i1-01ABSTRACT:
This research delves into the essential connection between audit committee characteristics and the ESG performance of corporations in Indonesia. Existing studies emphasize the pivotal role of audit committees in shaping ESG outcomes, focusing on factors like independence, expertise, and committee size. However, there is a limited comprehensive examination of these dynamics within the context of Indonesian businesses. The study seeks to empirically examine the correlation between audit committee characteristics and corporate ESG performance among listed companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, explicitly exploring four key attributes. The results highlight a noteworthy influence of Audit Expertise and Internal Auditor characteristics on corporate ESG performance. These findings provide valuable insights for companies, auditors, and policymakers, offering empirical evidence to enhance comprehension and practices related to corporate governance and ESG performance. Furthermore, the study's implications extend beyond the Indonesian context, contributing to a broader understanding of the global discourse on sustainable business practices.
KEYWORDS:
Include at least 5 to 6 keywords or phrases
REFERENCES:
1) M. Pozzoli, A. Pagani, and F. Paolone, “The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 371, no. November 2021, p. 133411, 2022.
2) M. Arif, A. Sajjad, S. Farooq, M. Abrar, and A. S. Joyo, “The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures,” Corp. Gov., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 497–514, 2020.
3) R. M. A. Zahid, M. K. Khan, W. Anwar, and U. S. Maqsood, “The role of audit quality in the ESG-corporate financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence from Western European companies,” Borsa Istanbul Rev., vol. 22, pp. S200–S212, 2022.
4) A. Del Giudice and S. Rigamonti, “Does audit improve the quality of ESG scores? Evidence from corporate misconduct,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 14, 2020.
5) K. M. Eisenhardt, “Agency theory: An assesssment and review,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 1989.
6) M. I. Jizi, A. Salama, R. Dixon, and R. Stratling, “Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 601–615, 2014.
7) M. Samy El-Deeb, T. H. Ismail, and A. A. El Banna, “Does audit quality moderate the impact of environmental, social and governance disclosure on firm value? Further evidence from Egypt,” J. Humanit. Appl. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 293–322, 2023.
8) A. Buallay and J. Al-Ajmi, “The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council,” J. Appl. Account. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 249–264, 2020.
9) M. Indira and M. Syafruddin, “Pengaruh Karakteristik Dewan Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan,” Diponegoro J. Account., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2021.
10) P. R. Esther Monica Setiawan, “Analisis Pengaruh Efektifitas Dewan Komisaris dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Sustainability Report,” Balanc. J. Akuntansi, Audit. dan Keuang., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 126–149, 2022.
11) R. Josua and A. Septiani, “Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Terhadap Pengungkapan Laporan Keberlanjutan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar pada BEI Tahun 2015-2018),” Diponegoro J. Account., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2020.
12) A. Ioana and M. Mariana, “Study regarding the impact of the audit committee characteristics on company performance,” Stud. Bus. Econ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 5–15, 2014.
13) E. Baraibar-Diez and M. D. Odriozola, “CSR committees and their effect on ESG performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 18, 2019.
14) S. Bose, M. J. Ali, S. Hossain, and A. Shamsuddin, “Does CEO–Audit Committee/Board Interlocking Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility?,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 819–847, 2022.
15) [M. Pozzoli, A. Pagani, and F. Paolone, “The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 371, p. 133411, Oct. 2022.
16) S. L. Wong, “The impact of female representation and ethnic diversity in committees on environmental, social and governance performance in Malaysia,” Soc. Bus. Rev., 2023.
17) D. S. B. Soh and N. Martinov-Bennie, “Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental, Social and governance assurance and consulting,” Manag. Audit. J., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 80–111, 2015.
18) A. Fatemi, M. Glaum, and S. Kaiser, “ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure,” Glob. Financ. J., vol. 38, pp. 45–64, 2018.
19) L. L. Fuadah, M. Mukhtaruddin, I. Andriana, and A. Arisman, “The Ownership Structure, and the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure, Firm Value and Firm Performance: The Audit Committee as Moderating Variable,” Economies, vol. 10, no. 12, 2022.
20) A. Dwekat, R. Meqbel, E. Seguí-Mas, and G. Tormo-Carbó, “The role of the audit committee in enhancing the credibility of CSR disclosure: Evidence from STOXX Europe 600 members,” Bus. Ethics, Environ. Responsib., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 718–740, 2022.
21) R. K. Sharma and R. K. S. Manjhi, “Internal Audit Under Section 138 an Inclusive Approach Towards,” Manag. Accountants, no. July, pp. 43–46, 2022.
22) M. Harasheh and R. Provasi, “A need for assurance: Do internal control systems integrate environmental, social, and governance factors?,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 384–401, 2023.
23) J. E. Koo and E. S. Ki, “Internal Control Personnel’s Experience, Internal Control Weaknesses, and ESG Rating,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020.
24) J. Lee, S. Kim, and E. Kim, “Environmental Responsibility, Social Responsibility, and Governance from the Perspective of Auditors,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 19, 2022.
25) M. Eulerich, A. Bonrath, and V. I. Lopez Kasper, “Internal auditor’s role in ESG disclosure and assurance: An analysis of practical insights,” Corp. Ownersh. Control, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 78–86, 2022.
26) M. Boulhaga, A. Bouri, A. A. Elamer, and B. A. Ibrahim, “Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 134–145, 2023.
27) S. Kim, “Internal Control Managers’ Accounting Experiences on Audit Quality—Focus on ESG,” Int. J. Financ. Stud., vol. 11, no. 2, 2023.
28) J. R. S. Fraser, R. Quail, and B. J. Simkins, “Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and the Roles of Management, Internal Audit, and Enterprise Risk Management,” SSRN Electron. J., no. January 2022, 2022.