JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

The past is history, the present is accurate, and the future is uncertain. The world is also getting along with many lives and organizations. Along and within the time, the organizations are apparent with leader-member exchange (LMX) that may be unavoidable, realized in the form of any relationships in the social context. The atmosphere brings forth engagement and performance within groups or communities. The essential variables driving and encouraging LMX to become an interesting research focus among scholars. This work aims to investigate the outstanding characteristics or variables of the quality of LMX following engaged employees and high performance. This study employs a systematic literature review. It explores and identifies the characteristics or variables encouraging LMX, engagement, and performance in the organizations. The conclusion says that it reveals various characteristics or variables of the concepts. However, quite a few of them accommodate the cultural context of a particular life of society, which considerably hinders the sound of the atmosphere.

KEYWORDS:

Leader-Member Exchange, Engagement, Performance, Systematic Review

REFERENCES:

1) Admasachew, Lul, and Jeremy Dawson. 2011. “Employee Engagement – a Brief Review of Definitions, Theoretical Perspectives and Measures.” : 11.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/215465/dh_129661.pdf.

2) Agarwal, Upasna A., Sumita Datta, Stacy Blake-Beard, and Shivganesh Bhargava. 2012. “Linking LMX, Innovative Work Behaviour and Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement.” Career Development International 17(3): 208–30.

3) Ahmad, M Shakil. 2012. “Impact of Organizational Culture on Performance Management Practices in Pakistan.” Business Intelligence Journal 5(1): 50–55.

4) Ali, Muhammad et al. 2018. “Examining the Impact of Managerial Coaching on Employee Job Performance: Mediating Role of Work Engagement, Leader-Member-Exchange Quality, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intentions.” Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science 12(1): 253–82.

5) Bakker, Arnold B., and P. Matthijs Bal. 2010. “Weekly Work Engagement and Performance: A Study among Starting Teachers.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83(1): 189–206.

6) Barbara Kitchenham. 2014. “Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews.” Keele University Technical Report 33(2004): 1–26.

7) Biron, Michal, Elaine Farndaljaap, and Jaap Paauwe. 2011. “Performance Management Effectiveness: Lessons from World-Leading Firms.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 22(6): 1294–1311.

8) Breevaart, Kimberley. 2015. “Leader-Member Exchange , Work Engagement , and Job Performance.” (JANUARY).

9) Brondino, Margherita, Andrea Bazzoli, and Margherita Pasini. 2020. “Safety Climate Agreement for a Safer Work Environment: A Multilevel Mediation Analysis of the Relationship between Lmx and Safety Behaviors.” TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology 27(3 Special Issue): 361–82.

10) Cruz-Benito, Juan. 2016. “Step 3: Systematic Literature Review Step-By-Step.” : 62.
http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/685.

11) Denisi, Angelo S., and Kevin R. Murphy. 2017. “Performance Appraisal and Performance Management: 100 Years of Progress?” Journal of Applied Psychology 102(3): 421–33.

12) van Dinter, Raymon, Bedir Tekinerdogan, and Cagatay Catal. 2021. “Automation of Systematic Literature Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review.” Information and Software Technology 136(October 2020): 106589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589.

13) Ehtesham, Ul Mujeeb, Tahir Masood Muhammad, and Shakil Ahmad Muhammad. 2011. “Relationship between Organizational Culture and Performance Management Practices: A Case of University in Pakistan.” Journal of Competitiveness | (4): 78–86.

14) Elanain, Hossam M.Abu. 2014. “Leader-Member Exchange and Intent to Turnover: Testing a Mediated-Effects Model in a High Turnover Work Environment.” Management Research Review 37(2): 110–29.

15) Furunes, Trude, Reidar J. Mykletun, Ståle Einarsen, and Lars Glasø. 2015. “Do Low-Quality Leader-Member Relationships Matter for Subordinates? Evidence from Three Samples on the Validity of the Norwegian LMX Scale.” Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 5(2): 71–87.

16) Galloway, TS, M Cole, and C Lewis. 2013. “ORE Open Research Exeter.” Journal of Cleaner Production (Lmx): 0–48.

17) Graen, George B., and William A. Schiemann. 2013. “Leadership-Motivated Excellence Theory: An Extension of LMX.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 28(5): 452–69.

18) Hardianto, Hardianto, and Vivi Puspita Sari. 2021. “Leader-Member Exchange in Educational Institutions.” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan 13(2): 1088–96.

19) Harter, James K., Frank L. Schmidt, and Theodore L. Hayes. 2002. “Business-Unit-Level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 87(2):
268–79.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11367971_Business-Unit-Level_Relationship_Between_Employee_Satisfaction_Employee_Engagement_and_Business_Outcomes_A_Meta-Analysis.

20) Henderson, David J., Robert C. Liden, Brian C. Glibkowski, and Anjali Chaudhry. 2009. “LMX Differentiation: A Multilevel Review and Examination of Its Antecedents and Outcomes.” Leadership Quarterly 20(4): 517–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003.

21) Hewitt, Aon. 2013. “Managing Employee Engagement During Times of Change.” Proprietary and Confidential (June): 1–11.http://www.aon.com/attachments/human-capital-consulting/2013_Managing_Engagement_During_ Times_of_Change_White_Paper.pdf.

22) Hooper, Danica T., and Robin Martin. 2008. “Beyond Personal Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Quality: The Effects of Perceived LMX Variability on Employee Reactions.” Leadership Quarterly 19(1): 20–30.

23) Inceoglu, Ilke, S H L Group, Peter Warr, and Work Psychology. 2012. “Personality and Job Engagement.” Journal of Personnel Psychology (2006): 1–9.

24) Kang, Dae Seok, and Jim Stewart. 2007. “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership and HRD: Development of Units of Theory and Laws of Interaction.” Leadership and Organization Development Journal 28(6): 531–51.

25) Kenexa. 2012. “Engagement Levels in Global Decline: Organizations Losing a Competitive Advantage.”

26) Lee, Allan, Geoff Thomas, Robin Martin, and Yves Guillaume. 2019. “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Ambivalence and Task Performance: The Cross-Domain Buffering Role of Social Support.” Journal of Management 45(5): 1927–57.

27) Martin, Robin, Geoff Thomas, Alison Legood, and Silvia Dello Russo. 2018. “Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Differentiation and Work Outcomes: Conceptual Clarification and Critical Review.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 39(2): 151–68.

28) Matta, Fadel K., Brent A. Scott, Joel Koopman, and Donald E. Conlon. 2015. “Does Seeing ‘Eye to Eye’ Affect Work Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behavior? A Role Theory Perspective on Lmx Agreement.” Academy of Management Journal 58(6): 1686–1708.

29) Mehta, Dharmendra, and Naveen K Mehta. 2013. “Employee Engagement: A Literature Review.” Economia. Seria Management 16(2): 208–15. http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/4192/3/indexcodes.txt.

30) Morrow, Paula C. et al. 2005. “The Role of Leader-Member Exchange in High Turnover Work Environments.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 20(8): 681–94.

31) Newman alex.newman@monash.edu, A.1, G.2 Schwarz gary.schwarz@soas.ac.uk, B.1 Cooper brian.cooper@ monash.edu, and S.1 Sendjaya sen.sendjaya@monash.edu. 2017. “How Servant Leadership Influences Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of LMX, Empowerment, and Proactive Personality.” Journal of Business Ethics 145(1):
49–62. http://10.0.3.239/s10551-015-2827- 6%0Ahttp://ezproxy.hsutx.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bft&AN=125205769&site=eds-live&scope=site.

32) Osborne, Schrita & Hammoud, Mohamad S. 2017. “Effective Employee Engagement in the Workplace.” International Journal of Applied Management and Technology 16(1): 50–67.

33) Pellegrini, Ekin K., and Terri A. Scandura. 2006. “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), Paternalism, and Delegation in the Turkish Business Culture: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of International Business Studies 37(2): 264–79.

34) Peterson, Tim O., and Shontarius D. Aikens. 2017. “Examining the Relationship between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Objective Performance within Higher Education: An Exploratory Empirical Study.” Journal of Leadership Education 16(2): 109–28.

35) Purcell, John. 2010. “Building Employee Engagement.” Acas Policy Discussion Papers (January): 1–12. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/58082/%5Cnhttp://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/s/1/Building_employee_engagement-accessible-version-Jun-2012.pdf.

36) Quarterly, Leadership. 2018. “Affect and Leader-Member Exchange in the New Millennium: A State-of-Art Review and Guiding Framework Author Affect and Leader-Member Exchange in the New Millennium: A State-of-Art Review and Guiding Framework.”

37) Radda, Abubakar A, Mubarak A Majidadi, and Samuel N Akanno. 2015. “Employee Engagement in Oil and Gas Sector.” International Journal of Management & Organizational Studies 4(3).

38) Sa’adah, Noor, and Tristiana Rijanti. 2022. “The Role of Knowledge Sharing , Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Employee Performance: An Empirical Study on Public Health Center of Pati 1, Pati 2 and Trangkil in Central Java.” International Journal of Social and Management Studies 3(1): 112–31.

39) Schleicher, Deidra J. et al. 2018. “Putting the System Into Performance Management Systems: A Review and Agenda for Performance Management Research.” Journal of Management 44(6): 2209–45.

40) Singh, Jitendra Kumar. 2013. “A Study of Employees ’ Job Satisfaction and Its.” 1(4): 105–11.

41) Swathi, S. 2013. “Effecting Employee Engagement Factors.” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 3(8): 3–5.

42) Tordera, Nuria, Vicente González-Romá, and José María Peiró. 2008. “The Moderator Effect of Psychological Climate on the Relationship between Leader - Member Exchange (LMX) Quality and Role Overload.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 17(1): 55–72.

43) Yalabik, Zeynep Y., Patchara Popaitoon, Julie A. Chowne, and Bruce A. Rayton. 2013. “Work Engagement as a Mediator between Employee Attitudes and Outcomes.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 24(14): 2799–2823.