JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

This study aims to analyze the effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on behavioral intention to use with an attitude toward using as an intervening variable on the use of e-wallet services in Padang City. The type of research used in this research is explanatory research, with the research method being an explanatory survey that emphasizes quantitative methods. the sample155 millennials are users of e-wallet services in the city of Padang. The sampling technique was purposive sampling. The data analysis method uses Structural Equation Modelling - Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS). The research results show that perceived usefulness significant positive effect on attitude toward using. Perceived ease of use has a significant positive effect on attitude toward using. Perceived usefulness has a significant positive effect on behavioral intention to use. Perceived ease of use negatively has no significant effect on behavioral intention to use. Attitude toward using has a significant positive effect on behavioral intention to use. Perceived positive usefulness has no significant effect on behavioral intention to use with attitude toward using as an intervening variable. Perceived ease of use has a significant positive effect on behavioral intention to use with attitude toward using as an intervening variable

KEYWORDS:

Perceived Usefulness; Perceived Ease Of Use; Attitude Toward Using; Behavioral Intention To Use

REFERENCES:

1) Al-ajam, AS, & Nor, KM (2013). Influencing Factors on Behavioral Intention to Adopt Internet Banking Service. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(11), 1652–1656. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.22.11.2896

2) Al-Jabri, IM (2015). The intention to use mobile banking: Further evidence from Saudi Arabia. South African Journal of Business Management, 46(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v46i1.80

3) Ardianto, K. (2020). Digital Wallet Ready to Change the Indonesian Economy. Https://Www.Goodnewsfromindonesia.Id/2020/07/02/Dompet-Digital-Siap-Ubah-Per Ekonomian-Indonesia.

4) Audina, M., Isnurhadi, & Andriana, I. (2021). Factors Affecting Behavioral Intention of Digital Financial Transactions (E-Wallet) in the Millennial Generation in Palembang City. Media Research Business & Management, 21(2), 99–116.

5) Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students' intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-03-2017-0004

6) Davis, FD (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

7) Diop, EB, Zhao, S., & Duy, T. Van. (2019). An extension of the technology acceptance model for understanding travelers' adoption of variable message signs. PLoS ONE, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216007

8) Fachreza, JA, Besra, E., & Verinita. (2022). Effect Of Perceived Usefulness And Perceived Ease Of Use On Intention To Use Mobile Banking (Brimo) With Attitude As Intervening Variable (Study At Lubuk Basung Sub-Branch Office Of Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia). Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(3), 1552–1561. https://www.enrichment.iocspublisher.org/index.php/enrichment/article/view/616

9) Gao, S., Li, Y., & Guo, H. (2019). Understanding the adoption of bike sharing systems: By combining technology diffusion theories and perceived risk. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(3), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-08-2018-0089

10) Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, & Anderson, RE (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th edition). Pearson Prentice Hall.

11) Hair, JF, Hult, GTM, Ringle, CM, & Rstedt, MS (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In SAGE Publications, Inc,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002

12) Hansen, JM, Saridakis, G., & Benson, V. (2018). Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers' use of social media for transactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.010

13) Hasya, R. (2022). These are the 10 most frequently used e-wallets by Indonesians in 2022. Https://Goodstats.Id/Article/Ini-10-e-Wallet-which-most-often-used-Masyarakat-Indonesia-M4TA4.

14) Hidayat, MT, Aini, Q., & Fetrina, E. (2020). Acceptance of E-Wallet Users Using UTAUT 2 (Case Study). National Journal of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology |, 9(3), 239–247.

15) Himel, MTA, Ashraf, S., Bappy, TA, Abir, MT, Morshed, MK, & Hossain, MN (2021). Users' attitude and intention to use mobile financial services in Bangladesh: an empirical study. South Asian Journal of Marketing, 2(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/sajm-02-2021-0015

16) Ho, JC, Wu, CG, Lee, CS, & Pham, TTT (2020). Factors affecting the behavioral intention to adopt mobile banking: An international comparison. Technology in Society, 63, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101360

17) Jogiyanto. (2007). Behavioral Information System. Andi.

18) Mawardi, R., Yeni, YH, & Pujani, V. (2022). Determinant of Behavioral Intention to Use E-wedding Gifts. Bung Hatta University Journal of Management, 17(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.37301/jmubh.v17i2.20011

19) Mulyana, A., & Wijaya, H. (2018). Designing an E-Payment System on an E-Wallet Using an Android-Based QR Code. Komputika : Journal of Computer Systems, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.34010/komputika.v7i2.1511

20) Munoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of Intention to Use the Mobile Banking Apps: An Extension of the Classic TAM Model. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3489124

21) Mutahar, AM, Daud, NM, Thurasamy, R., Isaac, O., & Abdulsalam, R. (2018). The Mediating of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use: The Case of Mobile Banking in Yemen. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 9(2), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtd.2018040102

22) Pasaribu, A. (2020). Ipsos reveals the highest use of digital wallets, ShopeePay to OVO. Https://Www.Antaranews.Com/Berita/1820756/Ipsos-Ungkap-Pengguna-Dompet-Digital-Tertinggi-Shopeepay-Hingga-Ovo.

23) Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011

24) Raza, SA, Umer, A., & Shah, N. (2017). New determinants of ease of use and perceived usefulness for mobile banking adoption. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 11(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECRM.2017.086751

25) Now, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business : A Skill-Building Approach (Seventh ed). John Wiley & Sons.

26) Setyowati, D. (2022). KIC Survey: Gen Z and Millennials Use Paylater for Fashion Shopping. Https://Katadata.Co.Id/Desysetyowati/Digital/61e0ecf4b1b96/Survei-Kic-Gen-z-Dan-Milenial-Pakai-Paylater-For-Belanja-Busana.

27) Suhartanto, D., Dean, D., Ismail, TAT, & Sundari, R. (2020). Mobile banking adoption in Islamic banks Integrating TAM model and religiosity-intention model. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(6), 1405–1418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2019-0096

28) Syah, DH, Dongoran, FR, Nugrahadi, EW, & Aditia, R. (2022). Understanding the technology acceptance model in the QRIS usage: Evidence from SMEs in Indonesia. International Journal Of Research In Business And Social Science, 11(6), 12–19.

29) Weng, F., Yang, RJ, Ho, HJ, & Su, HM (2018). A tam-based study of the attitude towards use intention of multimedia among school teachers. Applied System Innovation, 1(36), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi1030036

30) Zhang, T., Lu, C., & Kizildag, M. (2018). Banking “on-the-go”: examining consumers' adoption of mobile banking services. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 10(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-07-2017-0067