Exploring the Link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Customer Loyalty (CL) in the Funeral Assurance Industry in Zimbabwe: A Qualitative Analysis
1Christopher Zishiri,2Rutendo Agnes Chindondondo
1Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, Catholic University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
2Graduate School of Business, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i6-54ABSTRACT:
This study explored the link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Customer Loyalty (CL) in the Funeral Assurance Industry in Zimbabwe. Using a qualitative research methodology, the study examined the impact of Nyaradzo Life Assurance (Pvt) Ltd Company's CSR initiatives on recipient communities and individuals, and how these initiatives influenced CL. Data were collected from 60 participants using interviews and focus groups. The study found that Nyaradzo's CSR initiatives, including community development projects, education support to vulnerable groups, and environmental sustainability programs, were perceived positively by participants who were also the company's clients. The tree donation initiative, in particular, created a long-lasting emotional connection between clients and Nyaradzo, and this initiative was contributing towards the development of CL shown by the clients. The study also found that CSR initiatives that aligned with the customer's values and expectations, as determined by their contextual realities, were the ones that were more likely to influenced CL. Overall, the study highlighted the importance of CSR in developing CL in the funeral assurance industry in Zimbabwe, and the need for companies not only to align their CSR initiatives with the values and expectations of their clients but also to involve their clients in some their CSR initiatives.
KEYWORDS:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer loyalty
REFERENCES:
1) Aboud, A., & Yang, X. (2022). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: New evidence from China.
International Journal of Accounting & Information Management .
2) Achmad, W. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and Zakat: A Model of Philanthropy in the Society Era 5.0." Jurnal.
Journal Scientia, 11(1), 565-574.
3) Allui, A. & Pinto, L. (2022). Non-financial benefits of corporate social responsibility to Saudi companies. Sustainability.
Journal of Sustainability, 14(6), 3446.
4) Alsaigh, R., & Coyne, I. (2021). Doing a hermeneutic phenomenological research underpinned by Gasdamer's philosophy:
A framework to facilitate data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20.
5) Amsami, M. Ibrahim, S.B. Hamid, A.A. (2020). Influence of Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility on Customers’
Loyalty: Mediating Role of Customers’ Gratitude. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 15(3), 255-279.
6) Carcary, M. (2020). The research audit trail: methodological guidance for application in practice. Electronic Journal of
Business Research Methods, 18(2), 166-177.
7) Carroll, A. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational
Stakeholders. Business Horizons , 34(4), 39-48.
8) Carroll, A.B., & Shabana, K.M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research
practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
9) Choy, L. (2014). The strength and weakness of research of research methodology: comparison and complintary between
qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of humanities and Social Sciences , 19(4), 99-104.
10) Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4 ed ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
11) Cuthbertson, L.M., Robb, Y.A., & Blair, S. (2020). Theory and application of research principles and philosophical
underpinning for a study utilising interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Radiography, 26(2), 94-204.
12) Dangal, M., & Joshi, R. (2020). Hermeneutic phenomenology Essence in educational research. Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy,
4(1).
13) Dodgson, J. (2017). About Research: Qualitative Methodologies. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(2).
14) Flick, U. (2022). AN introduction to qualitative research. New York: Sage.
15) Fusch, P., Fusch, G.E., & Ness, L.R. (2018). Denzin's paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal
of Social Change, 1(2), 10.
16) Gray, D. (2014). Doing Research in the Real World. New York: Sage.
17) Heotis, E. (2020). Phenomenological research methods: Extensions of Husserl and Heidegger. International Journal of
School and Cognitive Psychology, 7(2), 221-231.
18) Hossain, M.S., Anthony, J.F., Beg, M.N.A., & Zayed, N.M. (2019). The consequence of corporate social responsibility on
brand equity: A distinctive empirical substantiation. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 1-7.
19) Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenological. Evanston: Northwestren University Press.
20) Jackson, A.Y., & Mazzei, L.A. (2022). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research (Second Edition ed.). New York:
Routledge.
21) Kang, C., Germann, F., & Grewal, R. (2016). Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate Washing away your
sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporatesocial irresponsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 59–79.
22) Le, T. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and SMEs' performance: mediating role of corporate image, corporate
reputation and customer loyalty. International Journal of reputation and customer loyalty. International Journal of
reputation and customer loyalty . International Journal of Emerging Markets.
23) Liqi, Y., Tao, L., Xiangyi, W., Gentana, G., & Ting, Z. (2022). Corporate social responsibility performance evalutaion from
the perspective of stakeholder heterogeneity based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated TOPSIS. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4), 918-935.
24) Makanyeza, C., Chitambara, T.L., & Kakava, N.Z. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility influence firmperformance?
Empirical evidence from Harare, Zimbabwe. Journal of African Business, 19(2), 155-173.
25) McCain Chen, S., Lolli, J.C., Liu, E. & Jen, E. (2018). The relationship betweencasino corporate social responsibility and
casino customer loyalty. Journal of Tourism and Economics, 25(4), 569-592.
26) Park, E. & Kim, K.J. (2018). What drives ‘customer loyalty’? The role of corporate social responsibility. Sustainable
Development, 27(3), pp.304–311. Journal of Sustainable Development, 27(3), 304–311.
27) Park, E. & Kim, K.J. (2018). What drives ‘customer loyalty’? The role of corporate social responsibility. Sustainable
Development, 27(3), pp.304–311. Journal of Sustainable Development, 27(3), 304–311.
28) Park, E. and Kim, K.J. (2018). What drives ‘customer loyalty’? The role of corporate social responsibility. Journal of
Sustainable Development, 27(3), 304-311.
29) Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social
Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
30) Pratt, M.G., Sonenshein, S. & Feldman, M.S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting
trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational research methods, 25(2), 211-238.
31) Randrianasolo, A.A. & Semenov, A.V. (2022). Synergy versus trade-off: the influence of national philanthropic
environment and industry on the relationship between research and evelopment and corporate social responsibility.
Journal of International Marketing, 30(1), 75-92.
32) Rassmussen, M. I. (2017). The Role of Theory in Research. Researchgate, 53-71.
33) Urquhart, C. (2022). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. New York: Sage.
34) Uslu, A., & Şengün, H.İ. (2021). Multiple Mediation Roles of Trust and Satisfaction in the Effect of Perceived Corporate
Social Responsibility of Loyalty. Journal of Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 19(1), 49–69.
35) van Manen, M. & van Manen, M. (2021). Doing phenomelogical research and writing . Qualitative Health Resaerch, 31(6), 1069-1082.
36) Wahyuni, D. (2012 ). The research design maze: Understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies . Journal
of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 69-80.
37) Wickert, C. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility Research . Journal of Management Studies, 58(8).
38) Wong, J.Y. & Dhanesh, G.S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) for ethical corporate identity management.
Corporate Communications International Journal, 22(4), 420–439.
39) Zhang, J., & Yi, W. (2022). Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility activities in the COVID-19 pandemic . Journal of
production & brand management, 31(7), 1063-1076.