What Drives Behavioral Intention to Use Investment Applications?
I Gede Agus Pertama Yudantara
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i6-10ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study is to predict and explain behavioral intentions and use of behaviour investment applications in Buleleng using TRA. Data were collected by pick-up survey with purposive sampling method and snowball sampling with 65 respondents where data was processed using PLS. The results show that the construct attitude, perceived usefulness and facilitating condition have a positive effect on the construct of behavioral intention. Construct behavioral intention has a positive effect on construct use of behavior. In addition, the added TRA construct is able to predict and explain the voluntary behavior of using investment applications, even though external influences do not affect it.
KEYWORDS:
Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived Usefulness, Facilitating Conditions, Behavioral Intention and Use of Behaviour.
REFERENCES:
1) Abbas, H. A. (2016). Subjective norm as antecedents of consumers’ behavioral intentions to use smart phones in Arab
world. Journal of Mobile Technologies, Knowledge and Society, 2016(2016), 863777.
2) Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2) , 179–
211.
3) Alzubi, M. M., Maged Mustafa Al-Dubai, & Farea, M. M. (2018). Using The Technology Acceptance Model In
Understanding Citizens’ Behavioural Intention To Use M-marketing Among Jordanian Citizen. Journal of Business & Retail
Management Research 2018; 12: 224-231. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(2), 224–231. 4)
Azjen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs.
4) Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned
action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.
5) Cho, H., & Lee, J. (2015). The influence of self-efficacy, subjective norms, and risk perception on behavioral intentions
related to the H1N1 flu pandemic: A comparison between K orea and the US. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4),
311–324.
6) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS
Quarterly, 319–340.
7) Dwivedi, R. (2017). Janssen et al., 2017 Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Janssen M., Lal B., Williams MD, Clement M. An Empirical
Validation of a Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption (UMEGA), Government Information Quarterly, 34(2),
211–230.
8) Farah, M. F., Hasni, M. J. S., & Abbas, A. K. (2018). Mobile-banking adoption: empirical evidence from the banking sector
in Pakistan. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
9) Gan, C. L., & Balakrishnan, V. (2017). Predicting acceptance of mobile technology for aiding student-lecturer interactions:
An empirical study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2).
10) Gokcearslan, S. (2017). Perspectives of students on acceptance of tablets and self-directed learning with technology.
Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), 40–55.
11) Guest, W., Wild, F., Vovk, A., Lefrere, P., Klemke, R., Fominykh, M., & Kuula, T. (2018). A technology acceptance model
for augmented reality and wearable technologies. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 24(2), 192–219.
12) Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The effects of trust on behavioral intention and
use behavior within e-government contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102553.
13) Hsu, C.-L., & Lin, J. C.-C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and
knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65–74.
14) Hussein, Z. (2018). Subjective norm and perceived enjoyment among students in influencing the intention to use
elearning. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 9(13), 852–858.
15) Hwang, J., Kim, J. J., & Lee, K.-W. (2021). Investigating consumer innovativeness in the context of drone food delivery
services: Its impact on attitude and behavioral intentions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120433.
16) Hwang, J., Lee, J. S., & Kim, H. (2019). Perceived innovativeness of drone food delivery services and its impacts on attitude
and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of gender and age. International Journal of Hospitality Management,
81(December 2018), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.03.002
17) Im, I., Hong, S., & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model.
Information & Management, 48(1), 1–8.
18) Karim, M. W., Haque, A., Ulfy, M. A., Hossain, M. A., & Anis, M. Z. (2020). Factors Influencing the Use of E-wallet as a
Payment Method among Malaysian Young Adults. Journal of International Business and Management.
https://doi.org/10.37227/jibm-2020-2-21/
19) Kaushik, A. K., Agrawal, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Tourist behaviour towards self-service hotel technology adoption:
Trust and subjective norm as key antecedents. Tourism Management Perspectives, 16, 278–289.
20) Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The
role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564.
21) Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., Annamalai, N., & Osman, S. (2020). Behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the
role of self-efficacy, subjective norm, and WhatsApp use habit. IEEE Access, 8, 208058–208074.
22) Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will
transform life, business, and the global economy (Vol. 180). McKinsey Global Institute San Francisco, CA.
23) Mohammadi, H. (2015). RETRACTED: Factors affecting the e-learning outcomes: An integration of TAM and IS success
model. Elsevier.
24) Mokhtar, S. A., Katan, H., & Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I. (2018). Instructors’ behavioural intention to use learning management
system: An integrated TAM perspective. TEM Journal, 7(3), 513.
25) Muslim, A., Harun, A., Ismael, D., & Othman, B. (2020). Social media experience, attitude and behavioral intention
towards umrah package among generation X and Y. Management Science Letters, 10(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.020
26) Pookulangara, S., Parr, J., Tanoff, L., & Nix, K. (2017). Insta-shopping: Examining use of Instagram for shopping online
using Theory of Reasoned Action. International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, 74(1).
27) Rahi, S., Ghani, M., Alnaser, F., & Ngah, A. (2018). Investigating the role of unified theory of acceptance and use of
technology (UTAUT) in internet banking adoption context. Management Science Letters, 8(3), 173–186.
28) Son, H., Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2015). What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An
empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions. Automation in Construction, 49,
92–99.
29) Sunny, P. (2020). Determinants of Behavioral Intention To Use Mobile Wallets – a. 5(May 2018), 52–62.
30) Tri Cahya, B., & Ayu Kusuma, N. W. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kemajuan Teknologi Terhadap Minat Investasi Saham.
Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Keislaman, 7, 192–207.
31) Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the
unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157–178.
32) Verkijika, S. F. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce applications in Cameroon. Telematics and
Informatics, 35(6), 1665–1674.
33) YANG, J.-J., & AHN, S.-C. (2020). The effects of attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intention on perceived values in
traditional marketplaces. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(10), 25–38.
34) Yeo, V. C. S., Goh, S. K., & Rezaei, S. (2017). Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food
delivery (OFD) services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35(July 2016), 150–162.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.013
35) Yudantara, I. G. A. P., Putra, P. Y. P., & Musmini, L. S. (2021). Determinants of Implementation SIAPIK for Small Medium
Enterprise . Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tourism, Economics, Accounting, Management, and
Social Science (TEAMS 2021), 197(Teams), 632–639. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211124.091
36) Yudantara, I. G. A. P., Sulindawati, N. L. G. E., & Yuniarta, G. A. (2019). Analysis Use of Academics Information System by
Undiksha New Student. 69(Teams 2018), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.2991/teams-18.2019.12
37) Yudantara, I. G. A. P., & Yasa, I. N. P. (2020). Determinant Use of Behavior Online Shopping Information System.
158(Teams), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201212.058
38) Zheng, Q. J., Xu, A. X., Kong, D. Y., Deng, H. P., & Lin, Q. Q. (2018). Correlation between the environmental knowledge,
environmental attitude, and behavioral intention of tourists for ecotourism in China. Applied Ecology and Environmental
Research, 16(1), 51–62.