The Contribution of Philosophy to Ethical Corporate Finance: Challenges and Perspectives
Yolande Francois
Université Jean Moulin - Centre de recherche Magellan- 6 cours Albert Thomas- 69356 Lyon
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i4-36ABSTRACT:
This article explores the synergy between philosophy, corporate finance, and corporate social responsibility (CSR), emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinarity in addressing the complex ethical, social, and environmental challenges faced by organizations today. By integrating the teachings of philosophy and ethical theories, companies can enrich their understanding and practice of ethical corporate finance and CSR, developing conceptual frameworks, critical thinking skills, and systematic approaches for ethical decision-making and problem-solving. Companies that adopt ethical and responsible practices can promote value creation for stakeholders, financial performance, and long-term sustainability, thereby contributing to the achievement of sustainable development goals and the creation of a more just, sustainable, and responsible world.
KEYWORDS:
Philosophy, Corporate finance, Corporate social responsibility (CSR), Ethics, Interdisciplinarity, Ethical decision- making, Sustainability, Sustainable development, Financial performance, Stakeholders.
REFERENCES:
1) Boatright, J. R. (2008). Ethics in finance. Wiley-Blackwell.
2) Bolton, S. C. (2010). Ethics at work. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
3) Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational
stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
4) Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research
and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
5) Cunliffe, A. L. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407-426.
6) Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance:
An International Review, 20(3), 233-252.
7) Donaldson, T., & Werhane, P. H. (1999). Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach. Prentice Hall.
8) Epstein, M. J., & Spalding, R. E. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Journal of Corporate Citizenship,
46, 79-94.
9) Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art.
Cambridge University Press.
10) Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal
of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351-383.
11) Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62-77.
12) Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and
investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723-1742.
13) Sandberg, J., Juravle, C., Hedesström, T. M., & Hamilton, I. (2009). The heterogeneity of socially responsible investment.
Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 519-533.
14) Werhane, P. H., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Business ethics: The state of the art. Oxford University Press.