Determinants of Corporate Bond Demand: A Study in Vietnam
Ha Hong Hanh
National Economics University
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i4-32ABSTRACT:
Recently, corporate bond has been becoming a controversial debate topic in Vietnam. During 2022 Vietnamese economy experienced several devastating scandals relating to corporate bond that leading to the issuance of several legal regulations by the Government. Realistically, given the strong encouragement of Vietnamese Government, the size of corporate bond market has reached approximately 21% of national GDP (VCCI, 2022) illustrating a considerable attention of potential investors and local businesses on this typical capital raising instruments. However, from both academic and society perspectives, there has been a research gap in the extant literature review on the underlying reasons for corporate bond demand in an emerging country. Hence, the study aims to comprehensively examine the determinants of investor demand for corporate bond in the context of Vietnam. The research objectives are achieved by applying both qualitative and quantitative approaches. While the qualitative method which based on VCCI (2022) questionnaires to identify and document the corporate bond demand, the quantitative method provides statistical evidences on determinants of corporate bond demand. The research result show that the credit risk and bond market presence are significant attributes for investor demand. These indicators are more pronounced during the crisis period which is explained by information asymmetry theory and the benefit of diversifications. The research findings are consistent with prior studies of Hotchkiss and Ronen (2002), Hale and Santos (2008) stating that high investor demand shorten the time for subsequent bond issuance events and potentially reduces the corporate’s cost of capital. Therefore, the research is beneficial to the Government, corporate bond issuers and researchers.
KEYWORDS:
corporate bond, corporate bond demand, corporate bond market, Vietnam
REFERENCES:
1) Baltagi BH (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York
2) Berlin, M., & Loeys, J. (1988). Bond covenants and delegated monitoring. Journal of Finance, 43, 397–412
3) Cantillo, M., & Wright, J. (2000). How do firms choose their lenders? An empirical investigation. Review of Financial
Studies, 13, 155–189
4) Champagne C, Coggins F, Sodjahin A (2017) Corporate bond market interdependence: credit spread correlation between
and within U.S. and Canadian corporate bond markets. North Am J Econ Finance 41:1–17
5) Chen L, Lesmond DA, Wei J (2007) Corporate yield spreads and bond liquidity. J Finance 62(1):119–149
6) Chen R, Yang L, Wang W, Tang L (2015) Discovering the impact of systemic and idiosyncratic risk factors on credit
spread of corporate bond within the framework of intelligent knowledge management. Ann Oper Res 234(1):3–15
7) Cornelli, F., & Goldreich, D. (2003). Bookbuilding: How informative is the order book? Journal of Finance, 58, 1415–1443
8) Costantini, M., & Sousa, R. M. (2022). What uncertainty does to euro area sovereign bond markets: Flight to safety and
flight to quality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 122, 102574
9) Covitz D, Downing C (2007) Liquidity or credit risk? The determinants of very short-term corporate yield spreads. J Finance
62(5):2303–2328
10) Diamond, D. W. (1991a). Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 106, 709 -
737
11) Denis, D. J., & Mihov, V. T. (2003). The choice among bank debt, non‐bank private debt, and public debt: Evidence from
new corporate borrowings, Journal of Financial Economics, 70, 3 - 28
12) Derrien, F. (2005). IPO pricing in “hot” market conditions: Who leaves money on the table? Journal of Finance, 60, 487 -
521
13) Duffie D, Saita L, Wang K (2007) Multi-period corporate default prediction with stochastic covariates. J Financ Econ
83(3):635–665
14) Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Agrawal D, Mann C (2001) Explaining the rate spread on corporate bonds. J Finance 56(1):32
15) Landschoot AV (2008) Determinants of yield spread dynamics: euro versus US dollar corporate bonds. J Bank Finance
32(12):2597–2605
16) Liang, J., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, X. (2016). Utility indifference valuation of corporate bond with credit rating migration by
structure approach. Economic Modelling, 54, 339 - 346
17) Massa, M., Yasuda, A., & Zhang, L. (2013). Supply uncertainty of the bond investor base and the leverage of the firm.
Journal of Financial Economics, 110, 185–214
18) Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91
19) Hale, G. B., & Santos, J. A. C. (2008). The decision to first enter the public bond market: The role of firm reputation,
funding choices, and bank relationships. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1928–1940
20) Hotchkiss, E. S., & Ronen, T. (2002). The informational efficiency of the corporate bond market: An intraday analysis.
Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1325–1354
21) Kou, J., & Varotto, S. (2008). Timeliness of spread implied ratings. European Financial Management, 14,503–527
22) Krebbers, A., Marshall, A., McColgan, P., & Neupane, B. (2021a). Bookrunner syndicate geography and the quality of
service: The benefits of a local team. Journal of nternational Money and Finance, 119, 102500.
23) Khanna, V. S. and Varottil, U (2012). Developing the Market for Corporate Bonds in India Available at SSRN
24) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2021602 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2021602
25) Lo, A. W., Mamaysky, H., & Wang, J. (2004). Asset prices and trading volume under fixed transaction costs. Journal of
Political Economy, 112, 1054–1090
26) Radier G, Majoni A, Njanike K, Kwaramba M (2016) Determinants of bond yield spread changes in South Africa.
27) Africa Review Economic Finance 8(2): 50 – 81
28) Rauh, J. D., & Sufi, A. (2010). Capital structure and debt structure. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1–39
29) Vietnam Chamber of Commercial Industry (2022) Annual Report on Vietnamese Corporate Perfomance
30) Wibaut, S., & Wilford, S. (2009). Holding equity and debt of the same firms can prove suboptimal. Journal of Applied
Finance (Formerly Financial Practice and Education), 19, 19–28