JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

As we all know, the Land of Papua is one of the areas in Indonesia that has abundant natural resources. But apart from all that, the development of the Papua region actually seems slower than other regions. The provinces of Papua and West Papua live in poverty due to their abundant natural wealth. The paradox of the curse of natural resources seems to have found an answer on Cenderawasih Earth. For example, Freeport and LNG Tangguh , which if managed properly can make the Papuan people prosperous, but until now the Papuan people live in the shadow of endless poverty. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of Strategy Policy and Strategy Planning and Budgeting on the Effectiveness of LNG Tangguh Corporate Social Responsibility for the Welfare of the People of West Papua mediated by Good Corporate Governance. This study uses a descriptive and verification approach. The population in this study is the people of West Papua around the LNG Tangguh company, totaling 170 people. The sampling technique (sampling) used is a type of non-probability sampling, namely purposive sampling. In this study, researchers conducted two kinds of validity and reliability tests of research instruments. Testing the validity and reliability of the first stage was carried out using SPSS software version 25 as an initial stage and for the second stage testing with LISREL 8/80 software. Based on the research objectives, it can be concluded that some of the research results are as follows: there is a positive and significant effect of Strategy Policy on the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility, there is a positive and significant influence of Strategy Planning and Budgeting on the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility, there is a positive and significant influence Strategy Policy on Good Corporate Governance, there is a positive and significant effect of Strategy Planning and Budgeting on Good Corporate Governance, there is a positive and significant effect of Good Corporate Governance on the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility, there is a positive and significant effect of Strategy Policy on the Effectiveness of Good Mediated Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Governance. there is a positive and significant effect of Strategy Planning and Budgeting on the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility mediated by Good Corporate Governance. The results of this study are new from the results of previous studies which can increase the influence of Strategy Planning and Budgeting on the Effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility. The results of this study can be input for the Central Government so that they can play an active role in implementing policies related to corporate social responsibility policies for the welfare of indigenous Papuans in the Tangguh Bintuni LNG mining area, West Papua. It is hoped that the involvement of all stakeholders, both at the regional and central levels, will be more intense considering that the results of the LNG Tangguh mining should be able to alleviate poverty in the Tangguh Bintuni LNG mining area in West Papua.

KEYWORDS:

corporate social responsibility, strategy polocy, strategy planning and budgeting, good corporate governance, Papua, LNG Tangguh

REFERENCES:

1) AB Susanto, Corporate Social Responsibility, Pendekatan Strategic Management dalam CSR: Orang . Erlngga, 2009

2) Alauddin Rusdin, Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Pelaku Usaha Pertambangan Emas dan Nikel di Provinsi Maluku Utara. Universitas Brawijaya (Disertasi) 2012

3) Amjelita,Ayu. 2019. Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan, Profitabilitas, Dan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Good Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Universitas Sumatra Utara Medan, AcademiaEdu 2019

4) Anugerah Boy, Mengurai Konflik dan Merumuskan Solusi: Orang. ResearchGate, 2019

5) Auty Richard & Allan Gelb. 2001. Political Economy of Resource-Abundant States. Universitas Lancaster Inggris 2001

6) Ben Caleb Egbide dan Godwyns Ade Aghude. 2014. Good Budgeting and Good Governance: A Comparative Discourse. Landmark University Omu-Aran Kwara State, Nigeria. ResearchGate 2014

7) Budimanta, A., Prasetijo, A. & Rudito, B. 2008. Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan, Alternatif Bagi Pembangunan Orang Orang:Pusat Keberlanjutan IndonesiaPengembangan (ICSD)

8) Christina, Ellen. 2001. Anggaran Perusahaan: Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama

9) Eko Sudarmanto. 2020. Konsep Dasar Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat: Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan (2020:21),

10) Fajar Nursahid. 2008. CSR Bidang Kesehatan dan Pendidikan Mengembangkan SDM. Orang

11) Gunawan, Adisaputro dan Asri, Marwan. 2003. Anggaran Perusahaan, Buku 1. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

12) Hadyarti Vidi, Tubagus M Mahsin. 2019. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Dan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Sebagai Indikator Dalam Menilai Nilai Perusahaan. Universitas Tronojoyo.

13) Harahap, Sofyan Syafri. 2001. Analitis Kritiss Atas Laporan Keuangan, Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada

14) Hery. 2017. Kajian Riset Akuntansi. Orang: ORANG Grasindo.

15) Jim Ife. 1997. Community Development, Creating Community Alternatives-Vision, Analisis and Practice

16) Jiraporn, Pornsit & Pandej Chintrakarn, Jang-Chul Kim, Young Sang Kim. 2016. The Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Asia-Pacific Journal of Orang Studies

17) Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup RI, Model Corporate Social Responsibility Bidang Lingkungan, 2013

18) Komber Mervin. 2016. Membangun Tanah Papua Dengan Adat, Jurnal Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Orang (DPD RI) Orang 2016.

19) Kompas. (https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2022/01/06/keamanan-intan-jaya-tentukan-masa-depan-ekploitasi- blok-wabu). Tanggal 01 Juni 2022

20) Lijan Sinambela. 2019. Manajemen Kinerja, Pengelolaan, Pengukuran, dan Implikasi Kinerja.

21) Mahmudah Anis Dariati, Emrinaldi Nur & Alfiati Silfi. 2020. Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Dan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Orang. Universitas Riau. Pekan Baru

22) Maria-Teresa Bosch-Badia 1 , Joan Montllor-Serrats 2,* and Maria-Antonia Tarrazon-Rodon. 2020. The Capital Budgeting of Corporate Social Responsibility 2 1 Deparment of Busines, Universitat de Girona, Campus de Montilivi, 17071 Girona, Spanyol.

23) Morin, Henderina & Muhadjir Darwin. 2011. Studi Dampak Program Corporate Social Responsibility Orang. Freeport Orang Terhadap Konflik Sosial Masyarakat Tujuh Suku Di Timika, UGM Orang.

24) Mulyadi. 2001. Akuntansi Manajemen: Konsep, Manfaat dan Rekayasa, Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

25) Nafarin M. 2004. Penganggaran Perusahaan. Jakarta: Salemba empat.

26) Pahrudin,Anton. Analisis Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan, Fakultas Ekonomi AKI Orang 2019

27) Pasaribu, A. F. (2021). Efektivitas Penerapan Corporate Social Responsibility Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 13(2), 158–165. Diperoleh dari https://ojs.unida.ac.id/livinglaw/article/view/4403

28) Purnama, Nurviana Anandanisa. Analisis Kemiskinan di Tanah Papua, Universitas Islam Orang, 2018

29) Puji Handayati, S.E. M.M. Ak. CA. CMA., DR dan Sulis Rochyatun (2019) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Menyusuri Jalan Meraih Sustainability Industry, Universitas Malang

30) Rahman, Reza. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility Antara Teori dan Kenyataan. Media Pressindo, Orang.

31) Rembrant. Pelestarian Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Penerapan Program Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Dan Lingkungan Di Sumatera Barat. Universitas Andalas, Disertasi 2001

32) Retnaningsih, Hartini. 2015. Permasalahan Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Dalam Rangka Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (The Problem on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for Community Empowerment) Pusat Pengkajian, Pengolahan Data dan Informasi (P3DI) Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI . 2015

33) Ross, Michael L. 1999. The Political Economy of the Resource Curse, University of California, Los Angeles ResearchGate

34) Santoso, K. 2007. Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan. Makalah disampaikan pada Optimalisasi Program CSR yang Berkelanjutan dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Sekitar Perusahaan, 21-22 November. LPPM-IPB.

35) Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R.J., (2016). Research Methods for Business: A skill Building Approach. 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, US.

36) Suharman, Harry. 2006. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan: Pengaruh Alat Evaluatif-Anggaran, Anggaran Partisipatif, Volume III. Bandung: PAAP UNPAD

37) Sutojo dan Altidge.E.J. 2008. Good Corporate Governance : Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang sehat. Orang

38) Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R &. D.Bandung : Alfabeta.

39) Stoner, Freeman dan Gilbert. 1995. Pengantar Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

40) Tito Anindito, Moh Didik Ardiyanto, (2013), Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan terhadap Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure dan Kinerja Finansial Perusahaan Kimia dan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Orang (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar dalam BEI

41) Wibowo (2007). Manajemen Kineja, edisi ke.3 Orang

42) Wijaya, T & Andreani, F. 2015. Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada Orang Sinar Jaya Abadi Bersama. Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya. Jurnal AGORA Vol. 3 Orang. 2 (2015).

43) Wikipedia, 2021. Kabupaten Teluk Bintuni https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabupaten_Teluk_Bintuni

44) Yapi Taum, Yoseph. Kekerasan dan Konflik di Papua : Akar Masalah dan Strategi Mengatasinya, Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2015

45) Zubaedi. 2013. Pengembangan Masyarakat (2013:162)