JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

The main objective of this study is to analyze the Knowledge Management System and Strategic Management Orientation on the Organizational Commitment of the Indonesian Navy in the Development of Submarines in the Country Mediated by Dynamic Capability. The samples in this study were First Officer strata, Middle to Senior Officers Planning Staff of the Indonesian Navy Headquarters, Operations Staff of the Indonesian Navy Headquarters, Indonesian Navy Materials Service, Indonesian Navy Procurement Service, Indonesian Ministry of Defense Barahan Staff, KRI Alugoro-405 Development Task Force and Koopskasel Officers. RI and Koarmada II Submarine Unit Officers, totaling 216 people. The data obtained were analyzed using SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) with the SPSS program version 22.0 and Smart PLS version 3. The findings of this study show that the direct Knowledge Management System and Strategic Management hypotheses Orientation influences the Indonesian Navy's Organizational Commitment in the Development of Submarines in the country. The results of the study also show that there is an influence of the Knowledge Management System, Strategic Management Orientation and Dynamic Capability on the Organizational Commitment of the Indonesian Navy in the Development of Submarines in the country. While the results of the indirect hypothesis also have an effect, namely the Knowledge Management System and Strategic Management Orientation have an effect on the Organizational Commitment of the Indonesian Navy in the Development of Submarines in the country which are mediated by dynamic capability. An important implication for the management of the Indonesian Navy is to prioritize knowledge and science to create soldier professionalism and high commitment in building submarines in the country.

KEYWORDS:

Knowledge Management System, Strategic Management Orientation, Dynamic Capability Organizational Commitment

REFERENCES:

1) Aaron S. Duncan, 2019.“Developing Dynamic Capabilities In Emerging Industries: A Qualitative Study Of The Microfoundations Of Dynamic Capabilities” Fielding Graduate University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2019. 27544757

2) Ararat, M., Aksu, M., & Tansel-Cetin, A. (2015). How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12103

3) Ashley Braganza, et al, 2017. “Resource management in big data initiatives: Processes and dynamic capabilities” Journal of Business Research, Vol 70, Jan 2017, Page 328-337

4) Bader Yousef, 2016. ‘The Effect of Strategic Orientation on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovation” , Itnternational Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences>Vol.9 No.11, November 2016, DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2016.911039

5) Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm.Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.

6) Barney, J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

7) Bronn, C., & Bronn, P. S. (2015). A systems approach to understanding how reputation contributes to competitive advantage. Corporate Reputation Review, 18, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.5

8) Bitzinger, Richard A.2003, Chapter 1 : The Rise and Fall of Second Tier Arms Producers. Adelphi Papers. 43:356

9) Dale A. Cake, et al, 2019. Strategic orientations, marketing capabilities and radical innovation launch success . Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 10, pp. 1527-1537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2019-0068

10) Darmanto, 2014. The Relationship between Strategy Orientation and Marketing Performance: The Role of Organizational Change Capability in Moderating Market Orientation Innovation Orientation, American International Journal Contemporer Research, Vol.4, p. 221-229.

11) Darroch & Jenny. 2005. Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firms Performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9, p.101-115

12) Fábio Lotti Oliva, et al (2018). The integration between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities in agile organizations, , emeraldinsight, Vol. 57 No. 8, 2019 pp. 1960-1979

13) Grinstein, A. 2008. The Effect Of Market Orientation and Its Components on Innovation Consequences: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.36, p. 166-73

14) Grinstein, A. (2008), “The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42, No. 1⁄2, pp. 115-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560810840934.

15) Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.224

16) Henry, P. (2015). Rigor in qualitative research: Promoting quality in social science research. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 4(5), 25–28. Retrieved from https://www.isca.in/rjrs/

17) Honeycutt, J. 2000. Knowledge Management Strategies : Mapping Your Organization's Success in Today's Competitive Marketplace : Little, Brown & Co. Inc

18) Ida Ayu, et.al, 2018. The Influence of Competency on Employee Performance through Organizational Commitment Dimension. IOSR Journals, International Organization of Scientific Research, Vol 20 Issue ; 2

19) Jerry indrawan1 dan Bayu Widiyanto, kebijakan ofset dalam membangun kemandirian pertahanan negara, Jurnal Pertahanan Agustus 2016, Volume 6, Nomor 2, 41-42

20) Juliano, et.al 2018 “The relationship between organizational commitment, knowledge transfer and knowledge management maturity’ Journal of knowledge management, VOL. 23 NO. 3 2019, pp. 489-507, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1367-3270, DOI 10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0199

21) Ketut Metria, I Gede Riana, 2018. “Pengaruh Dukungan Organisasi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasional dan Kinerja Pegawai “ , E-Journal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana, Vol 07. No 09. Tahun 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/EEB.2018.v07.i09.p02

22) Kreitner, Robert dan Angelo Kinicki. 2014. Organizational Behavioral-Ed. 5. Boston: McGraw-Hil

23) Kontan,Kekuatan Militer Asean Indonesia Nomor 1https: //nasional.kontan.co.id/ news/kekuatan-militer-asean- indonesia-nomor-1

24) Luthans, F. (2011). Perilaku Organisasi: Pendekatan Berbasis Bukti (Edisi Kedua Belas). New York, NY, 10020: McGraw-Hill Irwin

25) Nonaka, I., dan H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge Creation Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. New York, USA, 304.

26) Nurcahya Dwi Asmoro, Et Al,. 2018. “Role Of The Indonesian Navy Task Unit To Supporting Technology Transfer Of Submarine By DSME South Korea-PT PAL Indonesia”. VOL 9 NO 1 (2018): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASRO / DOI: https://doi.org/10.37875/asro.v9i1.6

27) Parker B, Helms MM. 1992. Generic strategies and firm performance in a declining industry. Management International Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 23-39, Schul PL, Davis PS, Hartline MD. 1995. Strategic adaptation to extended rivalry: effects on organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 129-142

28) Ricardo Jorge Correia, et al, 2020. Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantages as mediator variables between market orientation and business performance . Journal of Strategy and Management, DOI:10.1108/JSMA-12-2019-0223

29) Robbins, SP, & Hakim, T. (2013). Perilaku Organisasi (Edisi 15). New Jersey: Pendidikan Pearson.

30) Racelis, A.D. 2006. Relationship between strategic orientation and organizational performance: An exploratory study of Philippine companies. Philippine Management Review, 13(2).

31) Shahid Razzaq, 2018. “Knowledge management, organizational commitment and knowledge-worker performance” Source: Business Process Management Journal, Volume 25, Number 5, 2018, pp. 923-947(25) DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2018-0079

32) Suja Sundram, et al, 2020. “The Impact of Knowledge Management on The Performance of Employees: The Case of Small Medium Enterprises” Department of Business Administration, Jubail University College for Female Branch, Jubail industrial city, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

33) Sutanto, E. M., & Gunawan, C. (2013). Kepuasan Kerja, Komitmen Organisasional dan Turnover Intentions. Mitra Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 4(1), 76–88.

34) Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328-352.

35) Wei Jiang, et al, 2019. “The impact of business networks on dynamic capabilities and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic orientation” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 37(5), DOI:10.1007/s10490-018-9628-2

36) Voss, G.B. & Voss, Z.G. 2000. Strategic orientation and firm performance in an artistic environment. Journal of marketing, 64(1), 67-83

37) Yohannes, I., & Supit, I. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Komitmen Organisasional dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior yang Dimediasi oleh Kepuasan Kerja. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 4(3), 351– 368.

38) Yousif Al-Hakim, L. A., dan S. Hassan. 2013. Knowledge management Strategies, Innovation, and Organisational Performance: An Empirical Study of the Iraqi Mts. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 10(1), 58-71.

39) Wang, C. L., and Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda. The International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.

40) Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of marketing, 69(2), 42-60.

41) Zhang, X., & Venkatesh, V. (2017). A nomological network of knowledge management system use: Antecedents and consequences. MIS Quarterly, 41(4)

42) Zhou, H. Uhlaner, L.M. 2009. Knowledge Management in the SME and its Relationship to Strategy, Family Orientation and Organization Learning, ERIM, ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the ESE at Erasmus University Rotterdam, series ERIM Report Series Research in Management with number ERS-2009-026-OR