JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

The purpose of this study is to examine the direct effect of Strategic Planning and Economic Resource Base View on Sustainable Development and the direct effect of Government Policy on Sustainable Development and the indirect effect of Strategic Planning and Economic Resource Base View on Sustainable Development mediated by Government Policy. The model used in this study is to test the hypothesis by using the method of the Stuctural Equation Model (SEM). The software used for structural analysis is LISREL 8.80. Data were collected from a sample of 110 respondents who were deemed sufficient to represent the population. In taking the sample, survey technique was used, namely the entire population was used as the research sample.
The findings of this study are that there is a direct Strategic Planning and Economic Resource Base View on Sustainable Development at the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries and a direct influence on Government Policy on Sustainable Development at the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries as well as an indirect influence on Strategic Planning and Economic Resource Base View on Sustainable Development. Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries mediated by Government Policy. Of the seven proposed hypotheses, all of them have been proven to be accepted, which means that there is a direct and indirect effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable at the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. Government Policy plays a very important role as mediation in increasing the influence of Strategic Planning and Economic Resource Base View on Sustainable Development at the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.
The limitation in this research is that this research takes the results of previous studies from references above 5 years and even 10 years and also the research is quantitative and the data collection process takes place in a short time with a limited number of respondents.
The implication of the results of this study is that there is a positive influence of Strategic Planning and Economic Resource Base View on Government Policy and has implications for increasing Sustainable Development at the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

KEYWORDS:

Strategic Planning, Economic Resource Base View, Government Policy Sustainable Development

REFERENCES:

1) Abdulsyani (2007). Cooperation Dynamics . Jakarta: PT. Bumi Publisher. Script.

2) Allison, Kaye, (2005). Strategic Planning for Non-Profit Organizations, Indonesian Obor Foundation, Jakarta.

3) Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2004). Practice Research Procedures . Jakarta: PT Reneka Cipta

4) Barney, J, B. 1991. Firms Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management , Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99- 120.

5) Barney, J.B (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management , 27(6), 643-650.

6) Boyatzis, Richard E (2008). Competencies in The 21st Century. Journal of. Management Development, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 5- 12.

7) Chien. M. 2004. An Investigation of The Relationship of Organizational Structure, Employee’s Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge. Hollywood.

8) Cooper, Donald R and Pamela S. Schindler (2001). Business Research Methods. New York: Penerbit Mc Graw Hill.

9) Daft, Richard L (2010). Era Baru Manajemen. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

10) Dahuri, Rokhmin, “Road Map for Marine Development to Develop Competitiveness and Quality Economic Growth Towards an Advanced, Just-Prosperous, and Sovereign Indonesia” (paper presented at the National Symposium on the Road to Independence of the Nation, 2014)

11) Darroch, J. 2005. Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance.

12) David, Fred R (2005). Strategic Management . Jakarta: Salemba Empat Publishers.

13) DeSarbo, WS, Di Benedetto, CA, Jedidi, K., & Song, M. (2006). Identifying sources of heterogeneity for empirically derived strategic types: A constrained finite-mixture structural equation methodology. Management Science , 52: 909-924.

14) DeSarbo, W. S., Di Benedetto, C. A., Jedidi, K., & Song, M. (2006). Identifying sources of Fahmi, Irham (2011). Kinerja Organisasi dari Kinerja Keuangan. Bandung: Penerbit CV Alphabeta.

15) Freeman, R Edward; Stoner, James AF; Daniel, R and Gilbert, JR (1995). Management. New Jersey: Prentice. Hall Inc.

16) Gavrea, C; Stegerean, R and Borza, O (2016). The Quality of Railway Transportation Services: A Country Comparasion. Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society, 1-6.

17) Greenley, Hooley, Broderick & Rudd ,(2004). “Strategic Planning Differences Among Different Multiple Stakeholder Orientation Profiles” Journal of Strategic Marketing, September,pp:163 182

18) Greenstein. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. California: Corwin.

19) Henri, JF.. 2006. Management Control Systems and Strategy: A Resource-based Perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 529- 558. heterogeneity for empirically deriving strategic types: A constrained finite- mixture structural equation methodology. Management Science, 52: 909-92

20) Hinuri, Hindarmojo (2002). The Essence Og Good Corporate Governance. Jakarta: Penerbit Yayasan Pendidikan Pasar Modal dan Sinergy Comunication.

21) Hult, GTM, and Ketchen, DJ 2001. Does Market Orientation Matter?: A Test of the Relationship Between Positional Adventages and Performance. Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 899-906.

22) Hunger, David K and Thomas L. Wheele (2003). Strategic Management . Yogyakarta: Publisher Andi.

23) Karnadi, Erwin B (2017). The Eviews Guide To Basic Econometrics . Jakarta: Grasindo Publisher.

24) National Committee on Governance Policy (2011)

25) Lai, Emily R (2011). Collaboration. A Literature Review , p;1-48.

26) Lindeke, Linda L and Sieckert, Ann M (2005). Nurse-Physician Workplace Collaboration, OJIN. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing . Vol 10 No. 1, Manuscripts 4.

27) Luthans, Fred (2006). Organizational Behavior . Yogyakarta: Publisher PT. Andi.

28) Muhammad, Tasbi (2000). Strategy Management . Bandung: Yrama Widya Publisher.

29) Mulyadi (2007). Contemporary Management Tools For Multiplying Organizational Financial Performance . Jakarta: Salemba Empat Publishers.

30) Nawawi, Hadari (2007). Human Resource Management . Yogyakarta; Publisher Andi.

31) O'Regan, N., & Ghobadian, A. (2004). The importance of capabilities for strategic direction and performance. Management Decision , 42: 292-312

32) Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2017 Concerning Indonesian Maritime Policy

33) Permada, Dewi Danri Ratih (2018). Analysis of the Effect of the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance and Strategic Plans on Increasing the Performance of the Internal Audit & Control Unit of PT. GMF Aero Asia. Securities Journal, Vo. 1 No. 3 March.

34) Phillips, PA (2000). “The Strategic Planning/Finance Interface: Does Sophistication Really Matter?“Management Decision Vol 38/8: pp. 541- 549

35) Prasetyono and Kompyurini, Nurul (2015). Regional Hospital Performance Analysis Using the Balanced Scorecard Approach Based on Organizational Commitment, Internal Control and Implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Principles. X National Accounting Symposium , Hasanudin University Makassar.

36) Ricardo, John and Wade, Henry (2001). Organizational Performance of a Government Company. Journal Of The American Academy Of Business , Cambridge, 7(2), 58-68.

37) Roucek, SJ and Warren, LR, (2010). Cooperation Strategy and Its Implementation . Jakarta: Prenada Media Group

38) Saleh, Muhammad; Fatimah, Siti and Ahmad, Zulkifli (2010). Company Performance In Malaysia And Product Innovation Performance. Business Process ManagementJournal . 9(1), 120-135.

39) Scott, London (2016). Strategic Collaborative Dynamics . Journal of Business Research , 24(1), 15-22.

40) Now, U and Boogie. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A Skill –Building approach . New York: John Wiley and sons. Inc.

41) Sembiring, Masana (2012). Organizational Culture and Performance. Bandung: Focusmedia Publisher.

42) Sinambela, Lijan Poltak (2014). Public Service Reform (Theory, Policy, and Implementation). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara Publisher.

43) Slavkovic, Marko and Babic, Verica (2013). Knowledge Management, Innovativeness, and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Serbia. Economic Annals , volume LVIII, No. 199/ October-December, pp. 85-107.

44) Sugiyono (2016). Quantitative Qualitative Research Methods and R & B . Alphabet Publishers. Bandung.

45) Sulistiyono, Singgih Tri (2016), "Maritime Paradigm in Developing Indonesia: Learning from History", History Gazette , Volume 12 Number 2 October

46) Surya, Indra and Yustiavandana, Ivan (2006). Implementation of Good Governance Overrides Privileges for Business Continuity. Jakarta. Prenada Media Group

47) Law Number 32 of 2014 concerning Maritime Affairs

48) Wibawani, Sri and Tukiman (2016). Analysis of the Effect of Good Corporate Governance Against the Performance of Surabaya City Solar Market. Journal of Economics UPN Veteran East Java.

49) Woolfolk, James (2007). Managing Quality In Collaborative Dynamics : An Empirical Study. International Journal of Project Management , 34, 158-167.

50) Zarkasyi, Moh. Wahyudin (2008). Good Corporate Governance in Manufacturing Business Entities, Banking and Other Financial Services. Bandung: Alfabetha Publisher.