The Influence of Easy Access to Loans, Cost Efficiency and Loan Duration on Consumer Intention to Carry out Loans with Borrowing Risk as a Moderation Variable
1Firmansyah, 2Satria Bangsawan, 3Yuniarti Fihartini
1,2,3Master of Management University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i12-06ABSTRACT:
This research aims to examine the influence of ease of loan access, cost efficiency, and loan duration on intention to make a loan in the fintech P2P lending industry. This research also tests the role of lending risk as a moderating variable in this relationship. Data collection uses a purposive sampling method using a questionnaire via an online survey to people who have accessed fintech P2P lending services and consists of questions that are relevant to the research variables. The number of samples in this study was 240 respondents. Data analysis was carried out using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique with the help of the AMOS analysis tool. The results of this research show that ease of access to loans, cost efficiency, loan duration which is moderated by the risk of borrowing influence the intention of Fintech P2P Lending consumers to make loans so that it is hoped that it can add to the body of knowledge, because this research can theoretically help in deepening understanding of the factors. - factors that influence consumer behavior in the fintech market, it is also hoped that the results of this research can help fintech companies understand consumer preferences and behavior regarding the products and services they offer. By understanding consumer preferences, companies can develop products and services that better suit consumer needs.
KEYWORDS:
Fintech, Peer to Peer Lending, Intention to Borrow
REFERENCES:
1) Suryono RR, Budi I, Purwandari B. Detection of fintech P2P lending issues in Indonesia. Heliyon [Internet]. 2021;7(4):e06782. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06782
2) Trificana J. What is fintech? 6 main types of fintech and how they work. https://plaid.com/ [Internet]. 2022; Available from: https://plaid.com/resources/fintech/what-is-fintech/
3) Darwin. Seperti Apa Perkembangan Peer to Peer Lending di Indonesia? [Internet]. Julo.co.id. 2023. Available from: https://www.julo.co.id/blog/perkembangan-peer-to-peer-lending-di-indonesia
4) Kumar Tiwari K, Somani Associate Professor R, Mohammad I. Determinants of Loan Delinquency in Personal Loan. Int J Manag (IJM [Internet]. 2020;11(11):2566–75. Available from: http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp2566http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=11&IType=11http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=11&IType=11http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp2567
5) Ryu HS. What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech?: the moderating effect of user type. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2018;118(3):541–69.
6) Dietrich A, Wernli R. Determinants of Interest Rates in the P2P Consumer Lending Market: How Rational are Investors? arXiv. 2020;(March):0–2.
7) Hughes JP, Jagtiani J, Moon CG. Consumer lending efficiency: commercial banks versus a fintech lender. Financ Innov [Internet]. 2022;8(1):1–39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00326-1
8) Overton AA, MacFadyen AJ. Time discounting and the estimation of loan duration. J Econ Psychol. 1998;19(5):607–18.
9) McHugh S, Ranyard R, Lewis A. Understanding and knowledge of credit cost and duration: Effects on credit judgements and decisions. J Econ Psychol. 2011;32(4):609–20.
10) McHugh S, Ranyard R. Credit repayment decisions: The role of long-term consequence information, economic and psychological factors. Rev Behav Financ. 2012;4(2):98–112.
11) Schierz PG, Schilke O, Wirtz BW. Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2010;9(3):209–16.
12) Vinhal Nepomuceno M, Laroche M, Richard MO, Eggert A. Relationship between intangibility and perceived risk: Moderating effect of privacy, system security and general security concerns. J Consum Mark. 2012;29(3):176–89.
13) Ko H, Jung J, Kim J, Shim SW. Cross-Cultural Differences in Perceived Risk of Online Shopping. J Interact Advert. 2004;4(2):20–9.
14) Dorfleitner G, Hornuf L, Schmitt M, Weber M. FinTech in Germany. FinTech Ger. 2017;1–121.
15) Julia K. Financial Technology (Fintech): Its Uses and Impact on Our Lives. https://www.investopedia.com/ [Internet]. 2022; Available from: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fintech.asp
16) Feyen, Erik H.B.; Natarajan, Harish; Saal M. Fintech and the Future of Finance - Overview (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099450005162250110/P17300600228b70070914b0b5edf26e2f9f. 2022.
17) Bank Indonesia (BI). Mengenal Financial Technology [Internet]. Bank Indonesia. 2018. Available from: https://www.bi.go.id/id/edukasi/Pages/mengenal-Financial-Teknologi.aspx
18) Ribot JC, Peluso NL. A theory of access. Rural Sociol. 2003;68(2):153–81.
19) Schlager E, Ostrom E. The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis Author ( s ): Edella Schlager and Elinor Ostrom Reviewed work ( s ): Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources : A Concept. Land Econ. 1992;68(3):249–62.
20) Menon ME. The relationship between transformational leadership, perceived leader effectiveness and teachers’ job satisfaction. J Educ Adm. 2014;52(4):509–28.
21) Ryu HS. What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech?: The moderating effect of user type. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2018;118(3):541–69.
22) Gobel M. Analisis Efisiensi Biaya Operasional Melalui Pengelolaan Tunjangan Makan dan Jaminan Pemeliharaan Kesehatan pada Perusahaan Jasa Outsourcing. J EMBA J Ris Ekon Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akunt. 2013;1(4):1868–78.
23) Lee DKC, Teo EGS. Emergence of Fintech and the Lasic Principles. SSRN Electron J. 2015;(January 2015).
24) Sehdev B, Raman T V., Ranawat M. Evolving strategies for the structuring of working capital loans during covid times: An analysis of select indian private sector banks. Estud Econ Apl. 2021;39(12).
25) Venkatesh V, Davis FD. Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.
26) B SD, Nigalye A, Mahajan J. Adoption Factors of P2P Lending in India [Internet]. Vol. 1. Atlantis Press International BV; 2022. 129–144 p. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-080-0_11
27) Tatavarthy AD, Mukherjee K. Payment methods and their effect on durable goods replacement. J Consum Mark. 2019;36(4):484–93.