JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

This study has at least four aims to carry out. Such as describing participatory leadership style, work motivation, employee job satisfaction, and employee performance. Also, analyze the effect of participatory leadership style and work motivation on employee job satisfaction. Examine the effect of participatory leadership style and work motivation on employee performance and analyze the effect of employee job satisfaction on employee performance at the sub-district office in Malang City. The population in this study were Civil Servants at the Malang City District Office, amounting to 114 employees. The sample was taken using the slovin formula because the respondents were more than 100 employees, so 88 employees became the object of the research. The data analysis technique used is path analysis. The results show that participatory leadership style and work motivation affect employee job satisfaction. Participative leadership style and work motivation affect employee performance. Also, employee job satisfaction affects employee performance. Participatory leadership style and work motivation affect employee performance through employee job satisfaction.

KEYWORDS:

Participatory Leadership Style, Work Motivation, Employee Job Satisfaction, Employee Performance

REFERENCES:

1) Afandi, Pandi. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan kesatu : Zanafa Publishing.

2) Adha, R. N., Qomariah, N., & Hafidzi, A. H. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja, Budaya Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Penelitian IPTEKS, 4(1), 47-62.

3) Ananto, Setyo, I. Ketut Rahyuda, dan Putu Saroyeni Priartrini. 2016. Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap kepuasan Kerja dan Intensi Keluar Pada Asisten Kursus Metode Kumon di Bali dan Lombok. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol 5 No. 9: 3057-3086.

4) Badeni. 2013. Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung. Alfabeta

5) Fatmawati, Alvina Puspha, Wahyu Hidayat, dan Reni Shinta Dewi. 2014. Pengaruh Motivasi, Kompensasi Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis. No.3 No. 1: 239-248.

6) Fahmi. 2017. Analisis Kinerja Manajemen. Edisi Ke-1. Bandung. Alfabeta

7) Hasibuan, S.P.M. 2011. Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. CV. Haji Masagung, Jakarta

8) Hasibuan, M. S. P. 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

9) Mangkunegara, A. P. 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

10) Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. 2018. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. (S. Sandiasih, Ed). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

11) Marjaya, Indra dan Fajar Pasaribu. 2019. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Motivasi, Dan Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen. Vol 2 No. 1: 129-147.

12) Mahsun, Mohamad. 2013. Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Edisi Pertama. BPFE, Yogyakarta.

13) Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

14) Santika, I. Putu, dan Ni Luh Sili Antari. 2019. Pengaruh Motivasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan melalui Kepuasan Kerja sebagai variabel Intervening di LPD desa adat Kerobokan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen & Akuntansi. Vol 25 No.1: 72-83.

15) Setiawan, Andre (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Partisipatif Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Motivasi Kerja Dan Kepuasan Kerja. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Vol. 5, No. 3.

16) Simamora, Hendry. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. STIE.YKPN: Jogjakarta

17) Sutrisno, E. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana.

18) Thoha, Miftah. 2001. Kepemimpinan Dalam Manajemen. Fisipol UGM. Yogya.

19) Titisari, P. (2014). Peranan Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.