JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

This study aims to provide a detailed analysis of the pulse crops yield gaps for extra grain in production in Ethiopia. The study covers the period 2006/07-2020/21. Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSA) Agricultural Sample Survey (AgSS) and crop variety register issue of the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) data were used for the analysis. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and econometric analysis. The descriptive analysis provides quantitative estimates of yield gaps to measure and compare yield potentials and actual yields. Pooled Mean-Group (PMG) model was used to analyze the impact of yield and area on production. After cereals, the second most important crop group (in terms of acreage) is pulses. The area cultivated of pulses is grown by 29.6% between 2006/07-2020/21, which is a faster growth compared to the oil crops area (-3.8%). Pulse production has grown significantly in the country over the past 16 years, rising from around 12.7 million quintals in 2006/07 to 32 million quintals in 2020/21 with growth rate of 151.7%. The production has more than doubled, because of a 64.3% increase in area under the crop and a 35.7% increase in yield during the same period. The average pulses yield level is very low (1.4 tons/ha) as compared to that of the estimated average potential (2.0 tons/ha) in the country for the studied crops. For the analyzed period, results shows 0.2 qt/ha, 8.5 qt/ha, 9.1 qt/ha, 5.7 qt/ha, 2.0 qt/ha, 16.7 qt/ha, and 7.9 qt/ha for chick-peas, faba beans, field peas, gibto, haricot beans, mung bean and, lentils yield gap existed when the national average yield was compared with that of the released cultivars potential under farmer management, respectively for the analyzed period 2020/21. Our findings suggest that if farmers had closed yield gap, Ethiopia could have potential grain surplus of chick-peas, faba beans, field peas, gibto, haricot beans, mung bean, and lentils production by a respective of 4, 427, 200, 8, 61, 67, and 80 thousand Mt, without expanding cropland area. Based on the Pooled Mean-Group (PMG) model result, if cultivated area and yield of crops are increased by 1% then the production growth will be increased by 1% and by 0.99% in the long run respectively. Overall, this study reveals that there are large yield gaps and that substantial benefit for food production are possible through closing these gaps, without the need for new technology and expanding cropland area.

KEYWORDS:

pulse crops, cropland area, potential yields, actual yields, yield gaps, crop production, Ethiopia

REFERENCES:

1) Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J., 2012. World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

2) CSA (Central Statistical Agency) 2006; 2021. Agricultural sample survey. Report on area and production of major crops (Private peasant holdings, Meher season). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

3) CSA (Central Statistical Agency) 2021. Agricultural Sample Survey. Report on Area and Production of major crops, Meher season. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

4) FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2010. ‘Climate-smart' Agriculture. Policies, Practices and Financing for Food Security, Adaptation and Mitigation. Conference on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change, 31 October-5 November 2010, The Hague, 2010.

5) Fernando Aramburu Merlosa,∗, Juan Pablo Monzonb, Jorge L. Mercauc, Miguel Taboadad,Fernando H. Andradea,b, Antonio J. Halle, Esteban Jobbagyc, Kenneth G. Cassmanf,Patricio Grassinif 2015. Potential for crop production increase in Argentina through closure of existing yield gaps. Field Crops Research 184 (2015) 145–154.

6) Getaye Gizaw. Muniu 2020. Factors Affecting Agricultural Productivity in Doba Woreda, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Int J Econ Manag Sci, 9 doi: 10.37421/ijems.2020.9.577

7) Jack, B.K., 2011. Constraints on the adoption of agricultural technologies in developing countries. J-PAL and CEGA Agricultural Technology Adoption Initiative White Paper, CEGA, Berkeley, CA.

8) Kihara J, Gurmessa B, Tamene L, Amede T, and Sommer R. 2022. Understanding factors influencing wheat productivity in Ethiopian highlands. Experimental Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479721000296

9) M. Hashem Pesaran, Yongcheol Shin & Ron P. Smith 1999. Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94:446, 621-634, DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156

10) Merga, B., & Haji, J. 2019. Factors impeding effective crop production in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science 11(10), 1–14. doi:10.5539/jas.v11n10p1

11) Planning and Development Commission of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (PDC) 2020. Ten Years Development Plan. A pathway to prosperity 2021-2030.

12) Shiferaw, B., Kebede, T., Kassie, M., Fisher, M., 2015. Market imperfections, access to information and technology adoption in Uganda: Challenges of overcoming multiple constraints. Agric. Econ. 46(4), 475–488.

13) Taffesse, A., Dorosh, P., Asrat, S., 2011. Crop Production in Ethiopia: Regional Patterns and Trends ESSP II Working Paper No. 0016 (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia).

14) Van Ittersum, M.K., Cassman, K.G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., Hochman, Z., 2013. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crop Res. 143, 4–17.

15) World Bank. 2018. Ethiopia growth and competitiveness (P168566). The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20433.