JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

Recent statistics have shown how trade has grown quickly over the last decades in East, South, and Southeast Asian countries. East and Southeast Asian countries have been among the most dynamic participants in international trade. It strongly implies estimating how trade openness effects unemployment in East, South, and Southeast Asian economies. This paper empirically investigates the impacts of measures of trade openness on the unemployment rate in an unbalanced panel context for the period 2006-2016. The analysis focuses on the 16 east, south, and Southeast Asian countries, which are highly ranked in terms of their trade openness: Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Timor-laste, China, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Maldives. The results illustrate the negative relationship between trade openness and the unemployment rate. It has been found that trade openness reduces the unemployment rate significantly.

KEYWORDS:

Trade openness, Unemployment, Panel data estimation.

REFERENCES:

1) Arellano, M. & S. Bond, (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.

2) Anjum, N., and Perviz, Z. (2016). Effect of trade openness on unemployment in case of Labour and capital Abundant countries. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 5(1), pages 44-58.

3) Bank, A. D. (2013). Asian Development outlook 2013 highlights. ADB.

4) Bruno, G.S.F. (2005a). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics Letters, 87, 361-366.

5) Dutt P., & Mitra D., & Ranjan P, (2009). International trade and unemployment: Theory and cross-national evidence. Journal of International Economics, 78, 32-44

6) Davis, Donald R. and Harrigan, James, (2007). Good jobs, bad jobs, and trade liberalization. Journal of International Economics, vol. 84(1), pages 26-36, May

7) Davidson, C., Martin, L., and Matusz, S. (1999). Trade and search generated unemployment. Journal of International Economics 48, 271-299.

8) Felbermayr G., & Prat J., & Schmerer H. J. (2011). Trade and unemployment: what do the data say. European Economic Review, 55, 741-758

9) Gozgor, G. (2014). The impact of trade openness on the unemployment rate in G7 countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, an International and Comparative Review, 23(2), 1018-1037

10) Hasan, R., & Mitra, D., & Ranjan P., & Ahsan, R. N. (2012). Trade liberalization and unemployment: Theory and evidence from India. Journal of Development Economic, 97, 269-280

11) Helpman, E. & Itskhoki, O. (2007). Labor market rigidities, trade and unemployment. NBER working paper # 13365.

12) Halit, Y. (2013). Is trade liberalization a solution to the unemployment problem?. Portuguese Economic Journal, 12, 57- 85.

13) Kim, J. (2010). The Effects of Trade on Unemployment: Evidence from 20 OECD Countries. Research Papers in Economics No. 19: Department of Economics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

14) Makioka, R. (2011). Trade, Unemployment, and Reallocation with Search Frictions. Hitotsubashi University, Mimeo

15) Pesaran, H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test In The Presence Of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal Of Applied Econometrics J. Appl. Econ. 22: 265–312 (2007).

16) Publication, S. P. (n.d.). STATA LONGITUDINAL -DATA/PANEL -DATA ReFERENCE MANUAL RELEASE 13. College satation, Texas.

17) Rober, C., Hine & Wright, P. (1999). An empirical assessment of the impact of trade on employment in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Economy, 1999, vol. 15, issue 3, 485-500

18) Wang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2015). Saving good jobs from global competition by rewarding quality and efforts. Journal of international Economics, 96, 426-434

19) Organization, W, T. (2008). World Trade Report 2008-Trade in a Globalizing World. WTO