University’s Role as Social Responbility (Csr)
1Mar’a Elthaf Ilahiyah,2Endang Dwi Retnani,
3, Nur Laily,4Krisna Damayanti
1,2,3Accounting Department, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya (STIESIA)
4Management Department, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya (STIESIA)
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i8-27ABSTRACT:
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) that has occurred so far has received recognition within the company in the broad sense of the organization, it is possible that the implementation of CSR can also be carried out at universities where universities are also seen as organizations that need to also provide social responsibility to the community. Community and environment. The impression they have is reflected in CSR activities in the form of community service aimed at having an impact on the community's desire to continue education at the intended university, so that through social responsibility activities these universities will show their commitment when realizing quality human resources and having high concern for the surrounding environment. .The implementation of CSR is a statement of commitment formed by universities in showing support for the development of the quality of people's lives. The responsibility of universities for the world of education as well as holding social responsibilities that are equated with the implementation of the Tridharma of Higher Education, then an integrated unit can be formed for the welfare of the community.
KEYWORDS:
CSR, University, MSME, Dedication service.
REFERENCES:
1) M. Nejati, A. Shafaei, Y. Salamzadeh, and M. Daraei, “Corporate social responsibility and universities: A study of top 10
world universities websites,” African J. Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 440–447, 2011, doi: 10.5897/AJBM10.554.
2) M. Al-Shammari, A. A. Rasheed, and S. N. Banerjee, “Are All Narcissistic CEOs Socially Responsible? An Empirical
Investigation of an Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Between CEO Narcissism and Corporate Social Responsibility,” Gr.
Organ. Manag., p. 10596011211040664, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1177/10596011211040665.
3) A. Awaysheh, R. A. Heron, T. Perry, and J. I. Wilson, “On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance,” Strateg. Manag. J., no. November 2019, pp. 965–987, 2020, doi: 10.1002/smj.3122.
4) A. genedy & A. Sakr, “The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in
Korea,” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Dev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 59–73, 2017, doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1039903.
5) Y. C. Kim, I. Seol, and Y. S. Kang, “A study on the earnings response coefficient (ERC) of socially responsible firms: Legal
environment and stages of corporate social responsibility,” Manag. Res. Rev., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1010–1032, 2018, doi:
10.1108/MRR-01-2017-0024.
6) P. Tang, S. Yang, and S. Yang, “How to design corporate governance structures to enhance corporate social responsibility
in China’s mining state-owned enterprises?,” Resour. Policy, vol. 66, p. 101619, 2020, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101619.
7) A. W. Dusuki and T. Yusof, “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility model: empirical evidence from Malaysian
stakeholder perspectives,” Malaysian Account. Rev., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–55, 2008, [Online]. Available:
http://ari.uitm.edu.my/journals/222-the-pyramid-of-corporate-social-responsibility-model-empirical-evidence-frommalaysian-stakeholder-perspectives-asyraf-wajdi-dusuki-tengku-farrah-maimunah-tengku-mohd-yusof.pdf.
8) A. McWilliams and D. Siegel, “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?,”
Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 603–609, 2000, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AIDSMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3.
9) A. Bouzouitina, M. Khaireddine, and A. Jarboui, “Do CEO overconfidence and narcissism affect corporate social
responsibility in the UK listed companies? The moderating role of corporate governance,” Soc. Bus. Rev., vol. 16, no. 2,
pp. 156–183, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/SBR-07-2020-0091.
10) J. Ho, C. Lu, and L. Lucianetti, “Does engaging in corporate social responsibility activities influence firm performance? The
moderating effects of risk preferences and performance measurement systems,” Manag. Decis., vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 15–
37, 2021, doi: 10.1108/MD-07-2020-0925.
11) A. Kouaib, A. Bouzouitina, and A. Jarboui, “Exploring the nexus between CEO psychological biases, corporate social
responsibility and corporate governance: Evidence from the European real estate companies,” Int. J. Manag. Financ.
Account., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 183–208, 2021, doi: 10.1504/IJMFA.2021.117761.
12) R. Hermawati, L. Sugiyarti, R. Handayani, and ..., “The Effect of Trilogy Leadership Style and Organization Culture on School
Performance: Evidence form Indonesian Senior High School,” PalArch’s J. …, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 8512–8537, 2020, [Online].
Available: https://www.archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/download/2261/2229.
13) Munawir, K. Raharjo, M. A. Djalil, H. Syahputra, B. Muslim, and M. Adam, “Dimensions of identity strength and
organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in establishing good university governance and performance of religious
ideology-based higher educations,” J. Appl. Res. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 250–272, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-07-
2018-0115.
14) T. Thijssens, L. Bollen, and H. Hassink, “Secondary Stakeholder Influence on CSR Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder
Salience Theory,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 873–891, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2623-3.
15) W. Y. Oh, Y. K. Chang, and A. Martynov, “The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical
Evidence from Korea,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 283–297, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0912-z.