JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

Purpose:
This paper attempt to highlight various intervention measures /policy responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic specifically focusing on Southern African Countries. The paper will particularly concentrate mostly on social, economic, monetary, and fiscal interventions in Southern Africa.
Design/Methodology:
This study was done using a combination of both narrative and systematic literature reviews. A number of databases were searched for articles on Covid-19 economic interventions in Southern Africa and other regions. The searches were done mainly on Google scholar and Web of Science.
Findings:
The COVID‐19 pandemic and the measures deployed by various governments in conjunction with the private sector institutions to contain its spread were numerous. They included the following; lockdowns, quarantines, social distancing, travel bans and restrictions, masking requirements, and shutdowns of non‐essential activities. These measures in turn caused severe socioeconomic dislocations in African economies. Many Governments in Southern Africa responded with programs to mitigate personal hardship and disruptions to economic life. At the same time, central banks had to cut policy rates and injected liquidity on an astounding scale into the economies. It goes without saying, that the pandemic and the actions taken to contain it have exacted substantial costs on Southern African economies and the rest of the world, including deep economic contractions. Specifically, some of the socioeconomic impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic are; Decrease in GDP and GDP growth, loss in employment, increase in poverty, price increases and food insecurity, increase in exposure to corruption, and so forth.
Research Limitations/Implications:
The limitation is that the research was only based on existing literature. The implication is that different countries had different economic conditions and situations. Comparisons of such measures may not be universally applied to different countries as some countries for example are landlocked while others are not. Practical Implication; While these policy measures were welcome in as far as mitigating the negative effects of Covid-19, they were critiqued for largely being geared towards formal activities and not the informal sector of these economies where many micro and small-sized enterprises operate. Also, the responses were mostly short rather than long-term measures that targeted the impact of the pandemic on the key processes guiding the development of productive capacities. In this regard, there was the need for a more holistic policy response to the pandemic to ensure an inclusive and sustained development outcome. Policymakers therefore should endeavor to consider these realities in similar measures in the future.
Findings:
The COVID‐19 pandemic and the measures deployed by various governments in conjunction with the private sector institutions to contain its spread were numerous. They included the following; lockdowns, quarantines, social distancing, travel bans and restrictions, masking requirements, and shutdowns of non‐essential activities. These measures in turn caused severe socioeconomic dislocations in African economies. Many Governments in Southern Africa responded with programs to mitigate personal hardship and disruptions to economic life. At the same time, central banks had to cut policy rates and injected liquidity on an astounding scale into the economies. It goes without saying, that the pandemic and the actions taken to contain it have exacted substantial costs on Southern African economies and the rest of the world, including deep economic contractions. Specifically, some of the socioeconomic impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic are; Decrease in GDP and GDP growth, loss in employment, increase in poverty, price increases and food insecurity, increase in exposure to corruption, and so forth. This paper attempt to highlight various intervention measures /policy responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic specifically focusing on Southern African Countries.

KEYWORDS:

Covid-19 Pandemic, Socio-Economic Policy Response, Economic Policy Measures, Monetary Policy Measures, Fiscal Policy Measures Southern Africa

REFERENCES:

1) African Development Bank (2020). African Economic Outlook 2020‐Supplement: Amid COVID‐19, African Development Bank, Abidjan.

2) Baldwin, R and E Tomiura (2021), “Thinking ahead about the trade impact of COVID-19”, in R Baldwin and B Weder di Mauro (eds), Economics in the Time of COVID-19, a VoxEU eBook, CEPR Press.

3) Bank for International Settlements. (2021, February). BIS. Retrieved from BIS: https://www.bis.org/review/r211230c.pdf.

4) Bank of Zambia (2020). Measures in Response to the Deteriorating Macroeconomic Environment and the Coronavirus.

5) Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (2020), Tackling Covid-19 Together: The Trade Policy Dimension, GTA Report.

6) IMF. (2021, July 2). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from International Monetary Fund: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.

7) International Monetary Fund, (2020). Policy Responses to Covid-19. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-andcovid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.

8) International Monetary Fund [IMF]. (2020). IMF Country Focus: Six Charts Explain South Africa’s Inequality. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2020/01/29/na012820six-charts-on-south-africas-persistent-and-multi-faceted-inequality.

9) IMF. (2020). Kingdom of Eswatini - Request for Purchase Under the Rapid Financing Instrument. International Monetary Fund.

10) International Monetary Fund (2020) Policy Reponses to Covid-19. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-andcovid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.

11) International Monetary Fund. (2021, July 2). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from International Monetary Fund: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19#B

12) KPMG. (2020, August 14). KPMG. Retrieved from KPMG: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2020/04/zimbabwe-government-and-institution-measures-in-response-to-covid.html

13) Mangudya, J. P. (2020, March 26). Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. Retrieved from Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe: https://www.rbz.co.zw/documents/press/March/Press-Statement-COVID-Measures--website.pdf

14) Mangudya, J. P. (2021, February 18). Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. Retrieved from Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe: https://www.rbz.co.zw/documents/press/2021/February/Monetary-Policy-Statement-18-February-2021.pdf

15) Mangudya, J. P. (2022, February 7). Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. Retrieved from Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe: https://www

16) Mamba, M. (2020). The Potential Soci-Economic Impact of Covid-19 in Eswatini. United Nations – Eswatini

17) Ratshitanga, Z. (2020). World Bank Approves US$40 Million Loan to Support the Kingdo of Eswatini's Program for Economic Recovery to Mitigate Impacts of Covid-19. Washington: The World Bank.

18) Republic of Botswana. (2021). GOV.BW. Retrieved from Government of Botswana: https://www.gov.bw/covid-19-relief-fund

19) Republic of Botswana. (2021). GOV.BW. Retrieved from Government of Botswana: https://www.gov.bw/about-covid-19

20) The World Bank. (2021, June 11). The World Bank. Retrieved from World Bank: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/06/11/botswana-s-economic-recovery-efforts-gets-250-million-boostworldbank

21) Trajman, A. (2021). Assessment of Early Covid-19 Compliance to and Challenges with Public Health and Social Prevention Measures in the Kingdom of Eswatini, using an Online Survey . Plos One .

22) Seidman Makgetla, N. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the economy in Southern Africa (No. 2021/113). WIDER Working Paper.

23) Southern African Development Community (2020). Economics in the Time of COVID-19, a VoxEU eBook, CEPR Press.

24) United Nations. (2020, July). United Nations. Retrieved from United Nations: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/26833Botswana_General_Debate.pdf

25) Welch, K. (2021). Trade Liberalization and Growth: New Evidence. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper.

26) World Health Organization (WHO, 2021). The Impact of Covid-19in Southern Africa. Washington DC.

27) World Trade Organization (WTO,2021). Covid-19 in Southern Africa. South Africa

28) World Bank. (2020) Trade, Regionalism and Development. World Trade Organization, 2000, “Trade Policy Review in Tanzania. New York times.

29) World Health Organisation. (2022, February). WHO (COVID-19) Homepage. Retrieved from WHO Health Emergency Dashboard: https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/zw

30) Zhang, T. (2020). IMF Executive Board Approves $110.4 Million in Emergency Support to The Kingdom of Eswatini to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Monetary Fund