JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

Primary and chemical industries, mainly cement, had a 2.2% fall in net profit to Rp3.14 trillion. This research examines the impact of KAP reports on corporate growth, audit pressure, firm size, and the Indonesia Stock Exchange's chemical sector fundamentals for 2015-2020. The quantitative method uses test results and logistic regression. Their quantitative study. Explains quantitative research. This examination covers 75 industrial and chemical businesses listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2015-2020. This model has 26. Logistic regression analyzes the data. The research shows the KAP report affects the Audit Concern Proceeding (empirical study of introductory and industrial chemistry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2015-2020 period). Group expansion does not influence the Concern Audit (Empirical Study on Basic and Chemical Industries on the Indonesia Stock Exchange). 2015-20). Going Concern Audit denies leverage (Empirical Studies on Basic and Chemical Industries on the Indonesia Stock Exchange reviewed for 2015-2020). They are going Concern Audit group size wrong (Empirical Studies on Basic and Chemical Industries listed on the Exchange). Indonesia 2015-2020 KAP reports, firm growth, leverage, and size impact audit concern (Empirical Study of Basic and Chemical Industries listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2015-2020 Period).

KEYWORDS:

KAP Reputation, Company Growth, Leverage, Company Size, Awareness of Audit Reporting

REFERENCES:

1) Agoes, Sukrisno. 2012. Auditing Book One. Fourth Edition. Jakarta: Publisher Salemba Empat.

2) Anggraini, Nadya and Leny Suzan. 2015. The Effect of Head Reputation, Client Company Size, and Prior Opinion on Accepting Going Concern Modified Audit Opinions (Study on Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2007-2013). Telkom University.

3) Ardika, I Kadek and Ekayani, Ni Nengah Seri. 2013. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Tendency of Accepting Going Concern Audit Opinions in Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange for 2007-2011. Scientific Journal of Accounting and Humanika JINAH. Volume 3 No. 1 Singaraja, December 2013. ISSN 2089-3310

4) Arrested, Umar Bagus, and Leny Suzan. 2016. The Effect of Public Accounting Firm Reputation and Disclosure on Going Concern Opinions (Study on Property and Real Estate Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2010-2014 Period). Telkom University

5) Fahmi, Irham. 2014. Introduction to Financial Management. Bandung : Alphabeta Publisher.

6) cashmere. 2014. .Financial Report Analysis. Fourth Printing. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada Publisher.

7) Kusumayanti and Widhiyani. 2017. The Effect of Opinion Shopping, Disclosure and Reputation of the Head on Going Concern Audit Opinions. Udayana University Accounting E-Journal. Vol.18.3. March (2017): 2290-2317. ISSN: 2302-8556. Udayana University (Unud), Bali, Indonesia.

8) Lestari, Eva and Supadmini. 2012. Analysis of the Effect of Profitability, Liquidity, Solvency, Auditor Quality and Audit Opinion in Previous Years on Going Concern Audit Opinions on Basic Industry And Chemicals Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal. ISSN-1411-3880

9) Lie, Christian, Puruwita Wardani, Toto Warsoko Pikir. 2016. The Influence of Liquidity, Solvency, Profitability, and Management Plans on Going Concern Audit Opinions (Empirical Study of Manufacturing Companies on the IDX). Journal. Lie et al. / Indonesian Accounting and Finance Periodic, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2016): 84-105.

10) Morissan. 2014. Survey Research Methods. Second printing. Jakarta: Kencana.

11) Rodoni, Ahmad & Ali, Herni. 2014. Modern Financial Management. Jakarta: Media Wacana Partners Publisher.



12) Saifudin, Aris and Rina Trisnawati. 2016. The Effect of Company Size, Profitability, Liquidity, Solvency and Company Growth on Going Concern Audit Opinions (Empirical Study on Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2014). National Seminar and The 3rd Call for Sharia Paper. ISSN 2460-0784. Muhammadiyah Surakarta university.

13) Sawir, Agnes. 2015. Financial Performance Analysis and Corporate Financial Planning. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Main Library.

14) Sitanggang, J.P. 2012. Corporate Financial Management. Jakarta: Media Wacana Partners Publisher.

15) Sujarweni, Wiratna. 2014. Research Methodology. Yogyakarta: New Library Press Publisher.

16) Suryadi, Edi; Deni Darmawan and Medan Mulyadi. 2019. Communication Research Methods With a Quantitative Approach. Bandung : Rosda

17) Tandungan, Debby and I Made Mertha. 2016. The Influence of the Audit Committee, Company Size, Audit Tenure, and KAP Reputation on Going Concern Audit Opinions. Udayana University Accounting E-Journal. Vol.16.1. July (2016): 45-71. ISSN: 2302-8556. Udayana University (Unud), Bali, Indonesia.

18) Wulandari. 2014. Analysis of Factors Influencing Auditors in Giving Going Concern Audit Opinions. Udayana University Accounting E-Journal 6.3 (2014):531-558. ISSN: 2302-8556. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

19) Zulfikar and Muchamad Syafruddin. 2013. The Influence of Non-Financial Factors on the Acceptance of Going Concern Audit Opinions. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. Volume 2, Number 3, Year 2013, Pages 1-13. ISSN (Online): 2337-3806.

20) www.emitennews.com