Economic Valuation of Forest Resources from Drinking Water Customers’ Point of View: a Contingent Valuation Method Application
1Aria Tauristina,
2Diswandi Diswandi,
3Hadi Mahmudi
1,2,3Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Mataram
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i6-17ABSTRACT:
One of the steps taken to maintain and rehabilitate forest resources is to raise conservation funds from drinking water customers, which can be packaged in an environmental services payment scheme or PES. By taking the case of forest resource management in Central Lombok Indonesia, this study used the Contingent Valuation Method to find possible willingness to pay of drinking water customers for environmental service contributions. This study found that the willingness to pay (WTP) of drinking water customers for environmental service contributions that reflecting the economic valuation of Central Lombok Forest resources was an average of Rp. 3,260 (0.23 USD) per month. Factors that influence the magnitude of such values are The Level of Education, Income, Number of family members, and environmental awareness.
KEYWORDS:
Forest resource management; Payment of Environmental Services; Conservation; Contingent Valuation Method
REFERENCES:
1) http://ppid.menlhk.go.id, 2020. Forests and Deforestation in 2019
2) FWI/GFW 2011. Portrait of the State of Indonesia's Forests for the Period 2000-2009. Bogor and Washington DC: Forest Watch Indonesia
3) https://ntb.bps.go.id. 2020. Results of the 2020 Population Census of West Nusa Tenggara Province
4) WWF 2014. Environmental Services: Sustainable Funding Initiative for Rinjani Region. Mataram: World Wildlife Fund for Nature
5) Diswandi, D. (2017). A hybrid Coasean and Pigouvian approach to Payment for Ecosystem Services Program in West Lombok: Does it contribute to poverty alleviation?. Ecosystem Services, 23, 138-145.
6) Sylviani. 2008. Study of the Distribution of Costs and Benefits of Protected Forests as a regulator of Water Management. Journal of Forestry Social and Economic Research Vol. 5 No. 2 June 2008, P. 95 – 109
7) Stanton, 2012. Payments for Freshwater Ecosystem Services: A Framework for Analysis. West Northwest, Vol. 18, No. 1, Winter 2012
8) Afifah, Nur. 2013. Willingness to Pay for Water Environment Services for Conservation in TWA Kerandangan West Lombok Regency. Thesis. Master of Environmental Science Postgraduate Program, Diponegoro University, Semarang.
9) Prasetyo, N.J., and Saptutyningsih, E.2013. How is the Willingness to Pay for improving the environmental quality of tourism villages. Journal of Economics and Development Studies Vol.14, No.2, October 2013: 127-136. (http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/esp/issue/view/201/showToc)
10) Rosalina and Evi Gravitiani. 2014. Assessment of Willingness To Pay Air Quality Improvement Using Contingent Valuation Method. Journal of Economics and Development Studies Volume 15, Number 2, October 2014, pp.118-126
11) Widiastuti, Mary Maghdalene Diana. 2014. Analysis of Willingness to Pay (WTP) of Waste Management and Preservation Program of Citara Reservoir – West Java. Journal of Agribusiness and Fisheries Vol. 6 Issue. 3.
12) Sadikin, Pipin Noviati. Sri Mulatsih, Bambang Pramudya and Hadi Susilo Arifin. 2017. Willing To Pay Analysis on Ecotourism of Mount Rinjani National Park. Journal of Forestry Policy Analysis Vol. 14 No.1, May 2017 : 31-46
13) Ramos, H.M., McNabola, A., López-Jiménez, P. A., & Pérez-Sánchez, M. (2020). Smart water management towards future water sustainable networks. Water, 12(1), 58.
14) Diswandi, D. (2017). Payment for Environmental Services: An Alternative to Sharing Responsibility in Sustainable Forest Resource Management.
15) Fauzi, A. (2021). Economic valuation and assessment of the damage to natural resources and the environment. PT Publisher IPB Press.