The Effect of Local Government Characteristics And Audit Findings on Financial Performance With Responsibility Level Moderation
1Nirfa Ayunisa, 2Didik Susetyo,3 Yusnaini
1,2,3 Postgraduate Program, University of Sriwijaya
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i5-16ABSTRACT:
Purpose : to examine the effect of local governments characteristics and the findings of the investigation on financial performance moderated by the level of responsiveness of local governments.. Methodology: population and sample as many as 180 districts and cities. Secondary data sourced from the report on the results of the examination of the financial statements audited by the Audit Board of Republic of Indonesia from 2017 to 2019. The analysis technique of panel data regression analysis was data processing software eviews with a random effect model. Results: The results showed the size of the legislative, the weakness of the SPI and non-compliance with laws and regulations had no effect on financial performance. Meanwhile, the size of the government, and the level of wealth had a significant effect on financial performance. The level of responsiveness cannot strengthen the influence of size of legislative , weaknesses of SPI and non-compliance with laws and regulations on financial performance, while the level of responsiveness can strengthen the influence of government size and the level of wealth of local governments on financial performance.Limitation: the number of samples was only 12%, the results cannot be generalized. Contribution: local governments must realize recommendations on the findings of BPK RI and manage the assets effectively and efficiently. Ministry of Home Affairs, the provisions on the number of members of the legislative need to be reviewed.
KEYWORDS:
Local Government Characteristics, Investigation Findings, Performance and Responsiveness Level
REFERENCES:
1) Aziz, N. A. A. (2013) ‘Managing corporate risk and achieving internal control through statutory compliance’, Journal of Financial Crime, 20(1), pp. 25–38. doi: 10.1108/13590791311287328.
2) Da Cruz, N. F. and Marques, R. C. (2014b) ‘Revisiting the determinants of local government performance’,
3) Omega (United Kingdom). Elsevier, 44, pp. 91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.002.
4) Furqan, A. C. et al. (2020) ‘The effect of audit findings and audit recommendation follow-up on the financial report and public service quality in Indonesia’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(5), pp. 535–559. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-06-2019-0173.
5) Kusumawardani, M. 2012. Pengaruh Size, Kemakmuran, Ukuran Legislatif, Leverage Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Di Indonesia. Accounting Analysis Journal 1(1):27-35.
6) Mardiasmo. 2002. Otonomi Daerah Sebagai Upaya Memperkokoh Basis Perekonomian Daerah.
7) Mardiansmo. 2009. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi Yogyakarta
8) Muhammad, K. (2013) ‘Mewujudkan Good Governance Di Pemerintah Kota Malang Melalui Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik’, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), pp. 1689–1699.
9) Munawar, M., Nadirsya, N. and Abdullah, S. (2016) ‘Pengaruh Jumlah Temuan Audit atas SPI dan Jumlah Temuan Audit atas Kepatuhan Terhadap Opini atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota di Aceh’, Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, 5(2), pp. 57–67.
10) Muid, D. (2014) ‘Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah dan Temuan Audit BPK Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Studi pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Periode 2009-2011’, Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 0(0), pp. 513–527.
11) Nurdiono et al. (2016) ‘The Effect Of Budgets ’ Proportion And Non-Financial Factors On The Audit Results Of Local Governments ’ Faculty of Economics and Business , Universitas Lampung , Indonesia Faculty of Economics and Business , Universitas Gadjah Mada ( ssugiri@feb.ugm.ac.i’, Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 31(2), pp. 178–191.
12) Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, (2017) ‘Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemantauan Pelaksanaan Tindak Lanjut Rekomendasi Hasil Pemeriksaan Badan Pemeriksaan Keuangan’.
13) Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (2010) ‘Peraturan Pemerintah No 71 Tahun 2010, Tentang Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah’, pp. 1–30. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
14) Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (2014) Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah,. doi: 10.1080/14768320500230185.
15) Perwita Sari, R. et al. (2018) ‘Analysis Of Financial Performance In Public Sector (A Case Study in Lamongan, East Java-Indonesia)’, JASF Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 1(1), pp. 82–90. doi: 10.33005/jasf.v1i01.35.
16) Probohudono, R. S. A. & A. N. (2015) ‘Analisis Audit BPK RI Terkait Kelemahan SPI, Temuan Ketidakpatuhan dan Kerugian Negara’, INTEGRITAS Jurnal Anti Korupsi, 1(November), pp. 81–110.
17) Oussii, A. A. and Boulila Taktak, N. (2018) ‘The impact of internal audit function characteristics on internal control quality’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(5), pp. 450–469. doi: 10.1108/MAJ-06-2017-1579.
18) Rambe, Evayanti Br. 2016. Analisis Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Dengan Peran Pengawasan Sebagai Pemoderasi. Depok : Disertasi Departemen Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Indonesia.
19) Sedarmayanti. 2007. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung. Penerbit MandarMaju.
20) Setyaningrum,D. Dan Syafitri,F. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah DaerahTerhadap Tingkat Pengungkapan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 9(2), 154-170.
21) Soleman, R. (2013) ‘Pengaruh pengendalian internal dan good corporate governance terhadap pen cegahan fraud’, Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 17(1), pp. 57–74. doi: 10.20885/jaai.vol17.iss1.art5.
22) Sutaryo Dan Jaka Winarna 2013. Karakteristik DPRD Dan Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah : Dukungan Empiris Dari Perspektif Teori Agensi. SimposiumNasional Akuntansi XVI Manado, 25-28 September 2013.
23) .Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No.23. Tahun 2004. Tentang Otonomi Daerah Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2014. Tentang Pemerintah Daerah.
24) V. Wiratna, Sujarweni. 2015. Metode Penelitian Bisnis Dan Ekonomi. Catak Pertama. PustakaBaru Press. Yogyakarta.
25) Wardhani, R., Rossieta, H. and Martani, D. (2017) ‘Good governance and the impact of government spending on performance of local government in Indonesia’, International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 3(1), p. 77. doi: 10.1504/IJPSPM.2017.082503.
26) Yoyo Sudaryo dkk (2017) keuangan di Era Otonomi Daerah. yogyakarta : Andi
27) Yusuph & Guohua, W. (2017) ‘Challenges for Implementing New Public Management Reforms in Local Government in Tanzania: Evidence from Six Selected Local Government Authorities’, Public Policy and Administration Research, 7(6), pp. 32–45.
