Social Accounting Accountability for Social Costs in Non-Profit Entities (Study at Muhammadiyah Hospital Surabaya)
Andrianto
Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Muhammadiyah Surabaya
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i2-10ABSTRACT:
The business performance of an organization cannot be separated from how to participate in caring for social and environmental responsibilities. This research method uses a descriptive qualitative research type by describing the concept of social accounting as a development of the accounting discipline that leads to social values that have been running at Muhammadiyah Persyarikatan Hospital. The results showed that the performance of social costs from the achievement of profit performance, the performance of benefits and costs on social costs always decreased on the performance of activities related to social interests. This proves that it can be said that Muhammadiyah Surabaya Hospital is not too focused on activities in social interests and is only carried out voluntarily. the performance of benefits and costs on social costs always decreased on the performance of activities related to social interests. The performance of benefits and costs on social costs always decreased on the performance of activities related to social interests. This proves that it can be said that Muhammadiyah Surabaya Hospital is not too focused on activities in social interests and is only carried out voluntarily.
KEYWORDS:
Social Responsibility, Non-Profit, Social Costs, Benefit and Cost, Social Accounting
REFERENCES:
1) Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, JM (2004). An evaluation of the role of social, environmental and sustainable development reporting in reputation risk management. Fourth Asian Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting.
2) Bogdan, R., & Biklen, SK (1997). Qualitative research for education. Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA.
3) Fried, BJ, & Worthington, C. (1995). The multiconstitutency approach to organizational performance assessment: A Canadian mental health system application. Community mental health journal, 31(1), 11–24.
4) Giovannoni, E., & Fabietti, G. (2013). What is sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. Integrated reporting, 21–40.
5) Herman, RD, & Renz, DO (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 26(2), 185–206.
6) Higgins, RC, & Reimers, M. (1995). Analysis for financial management (Number s 53).
7) Irwin Chicago.
8) Kechiche, A., & Soparnot, R. (2012). CSR within SMEs: Literature review. International Business Research, 5(7), 97.
9) Manoochehri, G. (1999). Overcoming obstacles to developing effective performance measures. Work studies.
10) Marshall, C., & Rossman, GB (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications. Mautz, RK (1994). Financial Reporting for Nonprofit-Organizations: A Fresh Look by Robert K. Mautz. New York.
11) McLaughlin, TA (2016). Streetsmart financial basics for nonprofit managers. John Wiley & Sons.
12) Moelong, LJ (2005). Quantitative Research Methods. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.
13) Mook, L. (2007). Social and environmental accounting: The expanded value added statement. University of Toronto.
14) Mook, L. (2014). An integrated social accounting model for nonprofit organizations. In Accountability and Social Accounting for Social and Non-Profit Organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
15) Mook, L., & Quarter, J. (2006). Accounting for the social economy: The socioeconomic impact statement. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(2), 247–269.
16) Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development policy review, 14(4), 339–354.
17) Osborne, SP, & Ball, A. (2010). Social accounting and public management: Accountability for the public good (Vol. 5). Routledge.
18) Salamon, LM, & Anheier, HK (1996). Defining the nonprofit sector: the United States. Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies.
19) Schafer, A. (1999). A wink and a nod: a conceptual map of responsibility and accountability in bureaucratic organizations. Canadian Public Administration, 42(1), 5–25.
20) Zammuto, RF (1984). A comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness. Academy of management review, 9(4), 606–616.
