Psychosocial Work Environment and Employees’ Performance in Nigerian Oil and Gas Firms
1OSAZEVBARU Henry Osahon(Ph.D),2AGBOR Ebipade
1,2Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka.
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i12-53ABSTRACT:
This study investigated the effect of psychosocial work environment on the performance of employees of eight (8) oil and gas firms in Nigeria. Survey research design was used and questionnaire was the major data collection instrument which was administered to employees of oil and gas firms. Four (4) psychosocial work environment dimensions (proactive work behaviour, interpersonal relationship, feeling of safety, and job engagement) were used and data obtained were analyzed via descriptive and inferential statistical methods. The simple regression results established positive relationships between employee performance and proactive work behavior, interpersonal relationships, and feeling of safety. For job engagement variable, a negative effect was established. The study recommended that management of oil and gas firms should use proactive work behaviours such as motivational incentives to improve employees’ performance. Also, management should use other options of engaging employees on the job via creating a conducive, safe and less hazardous work environment for employees.
KEYWORDS:
Proactive work behaviour, Feeling of safety, Interpersonal relationship, Job engagement, Workplace environment
REFERENCES:
1) Abdulla, J. Baker, S. & Vlasic, B. (2010). Environmental performance in a banking perspective. Journal on Finance and Banking, 33(1) 22-33.
2) Baily, M. N., Farrell, D., Greenberg, E., Henrich, J. D., Jinjo, N., Jolles, M., & Remes, J. (2015). Increasing global competition and labor productivity: Lessons from the US automotive industry. McKensie Global Institute, November, 7.
3) Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223.
4) Barrada, J.R., Castro, Á., Correa, A.B. & Ruiz-Gómez, P. (2018). The tridimensional structure of socio-sexuality: Spanish validation of the revised socio-sexual orientation inventory. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 44(3), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1335665
5) Berg, T.I.J.V.D., Alavinia, M., Bredt, F.J., Lindeboom, D., Elders, L.A.M., & Burdorf, A. (2008). The influence of psychosocial factors at work and lifestyle on health and work ability among professional workers. International Archaeology and Occupational Environmental Health Journal, 81(2), 1029-1036.
6) Bowling, N.A. & Eschleman, K.J. (2010). Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(2), 91-103. doi: 10.1037/a0017326
7) Bragg, C.B. & Bowling, N.A. (2018). Not all forms of misbehavior are created equal: Differential personality facet-counterproductive work behavior relation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 26(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12200
8) Brown, J., Elliott, S., Christensen-Hughes, J., Lyons, S., Mann, S., & Zdaniuk, A. (2009). Using human resource management (HRM) practices to improve productivity in the Canadian tourism sector. Electronic Article, University of Guelph, 1(1), 1-15.
9) Cail, F. (2011) "Investigations in operators working with CRT display terminals: Relationships between task content and psycho-physiological alterations", in Ergonomie aspects of visual l display terminals. Proceedings of the international workshop, Milan, 17-19
10) Cato, S. T., & Gordon, J. (2009). Relationship of the strategic vision alignment to employee productivity and student enrolment. Research in Higher Education Journal, 7(1), 1-20.
11) Chandrasekhar, K. (2011). Workplace environment and its impact on organizational performance. International Journal of Business Systems, 7(1), 17-18.
12) Chen, Y., Li, S., Xia, Q. & He, C. (2017). The relationship between job demand and employees’ counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of psychological detachment and job anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(18), 1-15
13) Farh, C. C. & Seo, T. (2012). Emotional intelligence, teamwork effectiveness, & job performance: the moderating role of job context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2(1), 1-13
14) Filitrault, P., Harvey J. & Chebat, J.C. (2016). Service quality and service productivity management practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(3), 243-255.
15) Fleming, J.H., & Asplund, J. (2017). Human Sigma. New York; Gallup Press.
16) Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P. & Taylor, C. R. (2014). The race for talent: retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century. Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 12-25.
17) Govindarajulu N, Bonnie, F. Daily. (2014). Motivating employees for environmental improvement. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 1(1), 1-19
18) Gummesson, E. (2018). Productivity, quality and relationship marketing in service operations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 10(1), 4-15.
19) Hashiguchi, N., Cao, J., Lim, Y., Kubota, Y., Kitahara, S., Ishida, S. & Kodama, K. (2020). The effects of psychological factors on perceptions of productivity in construction sites in Japan by worker age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3517), 1-18. doi:10.3390/ijerph17103517
20) Haynes, B.P. (2008). The impact of office comfort on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 6(1), 37-51
21) Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 137-162.
22) Hill, C., Jones, G., & Schilling, M. (2014). Strategic management: theory: An integrated approach. London: Cengage Learning.
23) Humphries, M. (2015). Quantifying occupant comfort: Are combined indices of the indoor environment practicable? Building Research and Information, 33(4), 317-325.
24) Jalal H. (2015), Improving employee productivity through work engagement: Empirical evidence from higher education sector. Management Science Letters, 6(2), 61–70.
25) Kohun, (2012). Workplace Environment and its impact on organizational performance in public sector organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business System International Systems,1(1), 11-23
26) Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89-96.
27) McEwen, D. (2011). Employee engagement: A systemic approach to high employee engagement. London: Macmillan Publisher
28) Navarro-Carrillo, G., Beltrán-Morillas, A.M., Valor-Segura, I. & Expósito, F. (2017). What is behind envy? Approach from a psycho-social perspective. Revista de Psicología Social, 32(2), 217-245.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2017.1297354
29) O‟Neill, M.J. (2007). Measuring workplace performance. New York: Taylor and Francis.
30) Osazevbaru, H.O. & Amawhe, P.E. (2021). Empirical narratives on workplace environment and employees’ performance nexus: Evidence from the knowledge industry. Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 13(3), 422-441
31) Piana, V. (2011). Productivity. Available online from: http://www.economicswebinstitute. org/glossary/prdctvt.htm [24th January, 2022]
32) Ramos-Villagrasaa, P.J., Barradaa, J.R., Fernández-del-Ríoa, E. & Koopmans, L .(2019). Assessing job performance using brief self-report scales: The case of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 35(3), 195-205
33) Rothmann, S., & Storm, K. (2013). Work engagement in the South African police service. Available at: http://www.sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/925/973. [Accessed 30 January, 2022]
34) Saks, A. M. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
35) Saxena, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2015). Impact of employee engagement on employee performance - Case of manufacturing sectors. International Journal of Management Research and Business Strategy, 4(2), 139-174.
36) Shirom, A. (2013). Feeling Vigorous at work? The construct of Vigor and the study of positive affect in organizations, in Ganster, D. and Perrewe, P.L. (Eds). Research in Organizational Stress and Well-being, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 135-65.
37) Shuck, M. B., Rocco, T. S. & Albornoz, C. A. (2011). Exploring employee engagement from the employee perspective: implications for HRD. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(4), 300- 325.
38) Sulea, C., Maricutoiu, L., Dumitru, C.Z. & Pitariu, H.D. (2015). Predicting counterproductive work behaviors: a meta-analysis of their relationship with individual and situational factors. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 8(1), 66–81.
39) Tarurhor, M. E. (2017). Work stress and employees’ performance amongst staff of Delta State University, Abraka: The moderating role of career development. Ilorin Journal of Management Sciences, 4(1), 1-12
40) Williams, H. M., Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2007). Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking within work teams. Group and Organizational Management, 32(2), 569-598.