JEFMS Journal

ABSTRACT:

The purpose of this study is to apply the experience from a study conducted on entrepreneurial intention among university students with regard to the effective use of triangulation in entrepreneurship research. It applies the knowledge acquired to address issues such as inconsistencies, contradictions, and biases when using the single method. It was also used to develop a framework for research by adopting triangulation. The study discussed issues such as design and the whys and how’s of triangulation. It is hoped that the study will help future researchers who adopt triangulation to produce quality work and make informed judgements that lead to completeness. Finally, it would be interesting to researchers who always want to be up-to-date in academic research.

KEYWORDS:

Entrepreneurship research, Multi-method, Triangulation.

REFERENCES:

1) Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (2001). Handbook of Ethnography: Sage.

2) Banik, B. J. (1993). Applying triangulation in nursing research. Applied Nursing Research, 6(1), 47-52.

3) Becker, H., & Geer, B. (1957). Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison. Human Organisation, 16(3), 28-32.

4) Becker, H. S., & Geer, B. (1970). Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison. Qualitative Methodology: Firsthand involvement with the social world, 133-142.

5) Begley, C. M. (1996). Using triangulation in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1), 122-128.

6) Boyd, C. (2001). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. In Munhall PL (Ed) Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective. Third edition. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury MA.

7) Brannen, J. (2017). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: an overview Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 3-37): Routledge.

8) Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles: Sage Publications, Inc.

9) Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods (2 ed.): : Oxford University Press.

10) Bums, N., & Grove, S. K. (1993). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization (2 ed.). Philadelphia: WB. Saunders.

11) Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.

12) Casey, D., & Murphy, K. (2009). Issues in using methodological triangulation in research. Nurse Researcher, 16(4), 40-55.

13) Chamberlin, T. C. (1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, 754-759.

14) Coyle, J., & Williams, B. (2000). An exploration of the epistemological intricacies of using qualitative data to develop a quantitative measure of user views of health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(5), 1235-1243.

15) Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

16) Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research: SAGE publications.

17) Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications.

18) Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V. L., & Green, D. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11.

19) Denzin, N. (1989). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction To Sociological Methods. Third edition. Prentice Hall. New York NY.

20) Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

21) Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

22) Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88.

23) Duffy, M. E. (1985). Designing nursing research: the qualitative‐quantitative debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 10(3), 225-232.

24) Field, P., & Morse, J. (1985). Nurstng Research The Application of Qualitative Approaches Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent. 1-17.

25) Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking Data. Beverley Hills: Sage.

26) Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175-197.

27) Flick, U. (2002). Qualitative Sozialforschung–Eine Einführung, 4. Aufl., Reinbek.

28) Flick, U., & Kardoff, E., & Steinske, I. (Eds.). (2004). A Companion to Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

29) Foss, C., & Ellefsen, B. (2002). The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(2), 242-248.

30) Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2002). From the Individual Interview to the interview Socie. Handbook of interview research: Context and method, 3.

31) Halcomb, E. J., & Andrew, S. (2005). Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 13(2), 71-82.

32) Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J. S. (1991). Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research, 40(6), 364-366.

33) Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park: CA: Sage

34) Mactavish, J. B., & Schleien, S. J. (2000). Beyond qualitative and quantitative data linking: An example from a mixed method study of family recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 34(2), 154-163.

35) Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook: Sage.

36) Mitchell, E. S. (1986). Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science.

37) Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Nursing research: The application of qualitative approaches: Nelson Thornes.

38) Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods.

39) Redferm, S. J., & Norman, I. J. (1994). Validity through triangulation.

40) Richardson, L. (2000). New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 5-20.

41) Risjord, M., Moloney, M., & Dunbar, S. (2001). Methodological triangulation in nursing research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 31(1), 40-59.

42) Saukko, P. (2003). Doing research in cultural studies: An introduction to classical and new methodological approaches: Sage.

43) Sharp, H. O. (1943). Photogrammetry: J. Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

44) Shih, F. J. (1998). Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(3), 631-641.

45) Silverman, D. (1985). Qualitative methodology and sociology: describing the social world: Gower Pub Co.

46) Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. . (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

47) Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Teddlie, C. B. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol. 46): Sage.

48) Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253-258.

49) Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388-396.

50) Trow, M. (1957). Participant Observation and Interviewing: Comment. Human organization, 16(3), 33.

51) Webb, E., Campbell, D. T., & Schwartz, R. D. (1966). L. SECHREST. 1966. Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences: Chicago: Rand McNally.

52) Wolcott, H. (1995). The art of fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.