Internationalization of SMES Sarong Samarinda in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0
1Tommy Pusriadi, 2Sudarmiatin, 3Imam Mukhlis
1,2,3Universitas Negeri Malang
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i12-13ABSTRACT:
The existence of SMEs Sarong Samarinda has become one of the pillars of the economy of some Samarinda people. From raw material suppliers, weavers, business owners, and souvenir shops to online store activists, all are involved and feel the economic impact of the existence of the Samarinda Sarong Center. Like SMEs in Indonesia, Samarinda Sarong centers also experience many problems and obstacles in the sustainability of their business, especially in marketing Samarinda sarong products to the international market. This article examines how to maintain and develop the Samarinda Sarong SMEs in the 4.0 era, which is full of challenges to export. Case study research methods with field research, observation, and interviews. The study results show that the biggest problem currently experienced by weavers is product marketing and the weavers' mindset toward the importance of implementing management on a simple scale. So far, SMEs Sarong Samarinda has only focused on the domestic market, while opportunities to penetrate the export market are wide open.
KEYWORDS:
SMES, Sarong Samarinda, Industrial Era 4.0, Product Marketing
REFERENCES:
1) Acikdilli, G., Mintu-Wimsatt, A., Kara, A., & Spillan, JE (2022). Export market orientation, marketing capabilities and export performance of SMEs in an emerging market: a resource-based approach. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(4), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1809461
2) Al-Tit, AA (2020). E-commerce drivers and barriers and their impact on e-customer loyalty in small and medium-sized enterprises (Smes). Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11612
3) Asemokha, A., Musona, J., Torkkeli, L., & Saarenketo, S. (2019). Business model innovation and entrepreneurial orientation relationships in SMEs: Implications for international performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 17(3), 425–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00254-3
4) Child, J., Hsieh, L., Elbanna, S., Karmowska, J., Marinova, S., Puthusserry, P., Tsai, T., Narooz, R., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SME international business models: The role of context and experience. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 664–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.004
5) Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R and D Management, 47(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12186
6) Ejdys, J. (2015). Marketing orientation vs. innovativeness of SMEs of the Podlaskie Province. Business: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2015.563
7) Escandón-Barbosa, D., Hernandez-Espallardo, M., & Rodriguez, A. (2016). International Market Orientation and International Outcomes. Global Economy Journal, 16(4), 669–696. https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2015-0037
8) Fetter, B. (2019). Small and medium enterprises in the sustainable supply chain: A review. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 27(2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.12564
9) Firmanzah, F. (2008). Enhancing Foreign Consumer Acceptance, The Role of Capabilities of Creating Export-Market Oriented Products in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 10(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5568
10) Fraccastoro, S., Gabrielsson, M., & Pullins, EB (2021). The integrated use of social media, digital and traditional communication tools in the B2B sales process of international SMEs. International Business Review, 30(4), 101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101776
11) Herliana, S. (2015). Regional Innovation Cluster for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME): A Triple Helix Concept. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(August 2014), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.297
12) Kartiwi, M. (2006). Case Studies of E-commerce Adoption in Indonesian SMEs: The Evaluation of Strategic Use. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/0.3127/ajis.v14i1.8
13) Kuivalainen, O., Sundqvist, S., Saarenketo, S., McNaughton, RB, D'Angelo, A., Buck, T., Majocchi, A., & Zucchella, A. (2013). Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: Insights from an Italian sample. International Marketing Review, 30(2), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331311314538
14) Lin, Z., Cao, X., & Cottam, E. (2020). International networking and knowledge acquisition of Chinese SMEs: the role of global mind-set and international entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 32(5–6), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1640459
15) Musteen, M., Datta, DK, & Butts, MM (2014). Do International Networks and Foreign Market Knowledge Facilitate SME Internationalization? Evidence From the Czech Republic. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(4), 749–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12025
16) Onetti, A., Zucchella, A., Jones, MV, & McDougall-Covin, PP (2012). Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: Business models for new technology-based firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9154-1
17) Osakwe, CN, Chovancova, M., & Ogbonna, BU (2016). Linking SMEs profitability to brand orientation and market-sensing capability: A service sector evidence. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 24(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.8069
18) Osano, HM (2019). Global expansion of SMEs: role of global market strategy for Kenyan SMEs. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-019-0109-8
19) Pauli, U. (2016). Enhancing SMEs' growth by investing in organizational capital. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040308
20) Qosasi, A., Permana, E., Muftiadi, A., Purnomo, M., & Maulina, E. (2019). Building SMEs' competitive advantage and the organizational agility of apparel retailers in Indonesia: The role of ICT as an initial trigger. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 21(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.39001
21) Rafiki, A. (2020). Determinants of SME growth: an empirical study in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(1), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2019-1665
22) Rahayu, R., & Day, J. (2017). E-commerce adoption by SMEs in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. Eurasian Business Review, 7(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0044-6
23) Robak, E., Ocińska, AS ł., & Depta, A. (2016). Work-life balance factors in the small and medium-sized enterprises. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 24(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.8871
24) Solano Acosta, A., Herrero Crespo, Á., & Collado Agudo, J. (2018). Effect of market orientation, network capability and entrepreneurial orientation on international performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). International Business Review, 27(6), 1128–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.04.004
25) Wijaya, PY, & Suasih, NNR (2020). The effect of knowledge management on competitive advantage and business performance: A study of silver craft SMEs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2020.080406
26) Yoon, J., Kim, KK, & Dedahanov, AT (2018). The role of international entrepreneurial orientation in successful internationalization from the network capability perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061709