The Effect of the HPP Law on Market Reaction: A Study on the Indonesian Stock Exchange
1Afif Musthafa,2Taufiq Arifin
1,2Sebelas Maret University & Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36, Kentingan, Jebres, Surakarta, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i11-26ABSTRACT:
This study aims to examine the market reaction to tax reform. Tax reform was carried out by the government on the issue of post-covid economic recovery and responding to environmental changes. This policy has a new tax regulation policy in Indonesia in the form of a carbon tax, an increase in VAT, and an increase in income tax. This research is event study research. The population of this study is companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange on October 7, 2021. The data are taken from Yahoo Finance, totalling 753 companies. The sampling method used is the purposive sampling method, with the sample in the form of the Kompas 100 index and each company sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with a total of 9 sectors with an observation period of 10 days, 5 days, and 3 days before and after the ratification (-10.10), (-5.5), and (-3.3). The market reacted to the tax reform, and there was a significant abnormal return (p-value <0.05). Companies in the agricultural and mining sectors are companies that are of interest to investors. In contrast, companies in the financial, trade, services, and investment sectors are not attractive to investors with negative cumulative abnormal returns.
KEYWORDS:
Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan, tax reform, carbon tax, tax policy, market reaction, abnormal return
REFERENCES:
1) Adhitya. (2021a, December 16). Bank Dunia: UU HPP Penting Untuk Tingkatkan Penerimaan Pajak. Indopremier, 1–1.
2) Adhitya. (2021b, December 17). Menkeu Sri Mulyani Jamin UU HPP Tak Memberatkan Rakyat. Indo Premier.
3) Alsaifi, K., Elnahass, M., & Salama, A. (2020). Market responses to firms’ voluntary carbon disclosure: Empirical evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121377. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121377
4) Amiruddin, & Arifin, Z. (2012). Pengaruh Perubahan Undang-Undang Pajak Penghasilan Tahun 2008 terhadap Harga Saham dan Kebijakan Dividen. Kajian Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 70–77.
5) Anastasiou, D., Ballis, A., & Drakos, K. (2022). Constructing a positive sentiment index for COVID-19: Evidence from G20 stock markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2022.102111
6) Ardiyanti, N. (2017). ANALISIS DAMPAK KEBIJAKAN TAX AMNESTY 2016 TERHADAP ABNORMAL RETURN DAN TRADING VOLUME ACTIVITY PADA PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA [Skripsi]. Universitas Airlangga.
7) Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Salemba Empat.
8) Brown, S., & Warner, J. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 3–31.
9) Chen, K. H., Lai, T. L., Liu, Q., & Wang, C. (2022). Beyond the blockchain announcement: Signaling credibility and market reaction. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102209. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IRFA.2022.102209
10) Choi, J. K., Bakshi, B. R., & Haab, T. (2010). Effects of a carbon price in the U.S. on economic sectors, resource use, and emissions: An input–output approach. Energy Policy, 38(7), 3527–3536. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.02.029
11) Comyns, B. (2016). Determinants of GHG Reporting: An Analysis of Global Oil and Gas Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2517-9
12) Conefrey, T., Fitz Gerald, J. D., Valeri, L. M., & Tol, R. S. J. (2013). The impact of a carbon tax on economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(7), 934–952.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.709467
13) Daddi, T., Todaro, N. M., de Giacomo, M. R., & Frey, M. (2018). A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(4), 456–474.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2015
14) Deng, T., Xu, T., & Lee, Y. J. (2022). Policy responses to COVID-19 and stock market reactions - An international evidence. Journal of Economics and Business, 119, 106043. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECONBUS.2021.106043
15) Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4480656
16) Dongyang, Z. (2021). Does a green-designed fiscal policy optimal firm innovation scheme on volatility? A firm level evidence in the Post-Covid-19 era. Resources Policy, 74, 102428.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102428
17) Fernando, E., & Suryantini, N. P. S. (2018). DAMPAK PENGUMUMAN TAX AMNESTY PADA SAHAM LQ-45 BEI . Jurnal Manajemen, 1(7), 360–368.
18) Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
19) Hansuma, E. S., & Witono, B. (2021). Analisis Reaksi Pasar Modal Terhadap Peristiwa Pengesahan RUU Cipta Kerja. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kewirausahaan.
20) Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAR.2017.01.001
21) Hartono, J. (2017). Teori Portofolion dan Analisis Investasi. BPFE.
22) Helfaya, A., Whittington, M., & Alawattage, C. (2019). Exploring the quality of corporate environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(1), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2023
23) Iqbal, S., & Bilal, A. R. (2022). Energy financing in COVID-19: how public supports can benefit? China Finance Review International, 12(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-02-2021-0046
24) Jin, C., Lu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Market reaction, COVID-19 pandemic and return distribution. Finance Research Letters, 102701. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2022.102701
25) Kristiastuti, F., & Sari, U. K. (2021). ANALISIS REAKSI PASAR MODAL INDONESIA TERHADAP PENETAPAN UNDANG UNDANG CIPTA KERJA TAHUN 2020. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 17(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.26593/jab.v17i2.5269.206-215
26) Liesen, A., Hoepner, A. G., Patten, D. M., & Figge, F. (2015). Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1047–1074. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1547
27) MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event Studies in Economics and Finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729691
28) Murray, B., & Rivers, N. (2015). British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy, 86, 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2015.08.011
29) Pan, W.-F., Wang, X., Wu, G., & Xu, W. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and sovereign credit risk. China Finance Review International, 11(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-01-2021-0010
30) Peng, P., Zhu, L., & Fan, Y. (2017). Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.07.016
31) Prihastini, N. M. A., & Suprasto, B. (2017). REAKSI PASAR MODAL TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NO. 11 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PENGAMPUNAN PAJAK. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 21(2), 1026–1051.
32) Qian, W., Suryani, A. W., & Xing, K. (2020). Does carbon performance matter to market returns during climate policy changes? Evidence from Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 121040.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121040
33) Setiawan, D., Arifin, T., Aryani, Y. A., & Yau, J. T.-H. (2021). How Has the Indonesian Stock Market Performed During Covid-19 Outbreaks? International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4312.2021
34) Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
35) Suryadi, A. (2017). REAKSI PASAR MODAL TERHADAP PENGESAHAN UU ENGAMPUNAN PAJAK (TAX AMNESTY). Jurnal Manajemen Update, 6(2).
36) Udeaja, E. A., & Isah, K. O. (2022). Stock markets’ reaction to COVID-19: Analyses of countries with high incidence of cases/deaths in Africa. Scientific African, 15, e01076. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIAF.2021.E01076
37) Wibowo, M. S., & Sukmaningrum, P. S. (2020). Stock Market Reaction to the Tax Amnesty Announcement. Indonesian Capital Market Review, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.21002/icmr.v11i2.11608
38) Winarto, D. R., & Gandakusuma, I. (2020). Analisis pengaruh penerapan kebijakan tax amnesty pada abnormal return saham LQ-45 periode tahun 2015-2019 = Analysis of tax amnesty impact towards stocks LQ-45 abnormal return in period year 2015-2019 [Skripsi]. Universitas Indonesia.
39) Wulandari, W. R., & Sudrajat, M. A. (2018). PERBANDINGAN ABNORMAL RETURN DAN VOLUME PERDAGANGAN SAHAM SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH KEBIJAKAN TAX AMNESTY PERIODE I (Study Kasus Pada Bank Persepsi Penerima Dana Uang Tebusan Tax Amnesty Yang Terdaftar di BEI). Inventory: Jurnal Akuntansi, 2(2).
40) Wulaningrum, R., & Suyudi, M. (2019). ANALISIS KOMPARATIF ABNORMAL RETURN PERDAGANGAN SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH TAX AMNESTY PADA SAHAM SEKTOR PROPERTI DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. Jurnal Akuntansi Multi Dimensi, 2(1), 1–12.
41) Xie, J., Dai, H., Xie, Y., & Hong, L. (2018). Effect of carbon tax on the industrial competitiveness of Chongqing, China. Energy for Sustainable Development, 47, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2018.09.003
42) Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Yin, H., & Zhao, R. (2021). Pandemic, risk-adaptation and household saving: evidence from China. China Finance Review International, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-04-2021-0077
43) Zhang, Z., Zhang, A., Wang, D., Li, A., & Song, H. (2017). How to improve the performance of carbon tax in China? Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2060–2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.11.078