Board Characteristics and Company Performance: A Case Study for the U.S.
1Roy te Riele,2Georgios Georgakopoulos,3Kanellos Toudas, 4Paraskevi Boufounou
1Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Amsterdam
2Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Agricultural, University of Athens
3Assistant Professor of Accounting and Finance, Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, Agricultural University of Athens
4Assistant Professor of Development Finance, Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i11-20ABSTRACT:
This research aims to investigate corporate board structures and compositions, as well as their interrelationships. An empirical analysis on a sample consisting of 6,962 public traded U.S. corporations was conducted and the "isolation" consequences of board characteristics such as independence, financial expertise, and tenure on a company's earnings quality were examined. Furthermore, it was investigated whether and to what extent the tenure of outside directors influences the "isolation" effects of financial expertise and independence on earnings quality. The Modified Jones model was used to generate discretionary accruals, which were subsequently used to generate accrual-based earnings management. Firms with a more independent board and a higher proportion of outside directors with financial experience are found to have no effect on the degree of accrual-based earnings management. Outside directors' average tenure, on the other hand, has a negative and significant impact on earnings management. The study demonstrates that the average tenure of outside directors affects their independence as well as their financial expertise. Both have a statistically significant positive influence on accrual-based earnings management. This indicates that, even if outside directors are independent and there is at least one outside member with financial expertise on the board, the effectiveness of their monitoring decreases over time. In this study, the quality of earnings is examined using accrual-based earnings management models. The influence of these board qualities on real earnings management, however, has not been studied. As the usage of real earnings management has expanded in the post-SOX era, the utilization of these models is intriguing for future study pertaining to the effect of these characteristics. Furthermore, this study utilized and analyzed only a sample of large public U.S. enterprises, which are larger companies. Due to the SOX requirements to which these larger organizations are subject, this might contribute to a lack of diversity in the board makeup of these companies. This may have an effect on the regression findings by displaying low or non-significant effects. Future research may find it interesting to determine if there are differences between the effects of these governance qualities on earnings management for smaller and larger companies. Based on the findings, it is possible to conclude that when evaluating a firm's profits quality, it is critical to evaluate both the structure and makeup of the board, as well as the individual features of the outside members, such as their tenure. This study adds to the expanding corpus of research on the impact of board characteristics on corporate performance. It focuses on corporations situated in the United States, where corporate governance is a hotly debated topic, particularly after the enactment of SOX. It not only looks at the effect of these characteristics on earnings quality in "isolation", but it also responds to recent calls for researchers to look at the interaction of various board traits. It examines whether and to what extent outside directors' tenure influences the "isolation" consequences of financial expertise and independence on earnings management.
KEYWORDS:
Board characteristics, company performance, corporate governance, financial expertise, independence on earnings management, outside directors’ tenure
REFERENCES:
1) Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. SSRN Electronic Journal, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94034
2) Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 33 No. 3 pp. 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(02)00059-9
3) Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 9 No. 3 pp. 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-1199(02)00006-8
4) Kester, L., Georgakopoulos, G., Kalantonis, P., Boufounou, P. (2013). The Impact of Board of Directors’ Turnover on the Association between Financial Restatements and Audit Fees. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 53-75. ISSN: 1792-6580 (print version), 1792-6599 (online)
http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%203_2_10.pdf
5) Sun, X. S., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2020). Board tenure: A review. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, Vol. 31 No. 4 pp. 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22464
6) Dhaliwal, D., Naiker, V., & Navissi, F. (2010). The Association Between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees*. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 27 No. 3 pp. 787–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01027.x
7) Jones, J. (1991). Earnings Management during Import Relief Investigations, Journal of Accounting Research, 29,193-228. doi:10.2307/2491047, http://www.jstor.org/pss/2491047
8) Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 No. 4 pp. 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
9) Brown, P., Beekes, W., & Verhoeven, P. (2010). Corporate governance, accounting and finance: A review. Accounting & Finance, Vol. 51 No. 1 pp. 96–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.2010.00385.x
10) Kesner, I.F. (1988). Directors’ Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 66-84 https://doi.org/10.2307/256498
11) An, Y. (2017). Effect of Outside Director’s Quality on Firm Value and Earnings Quality. Research Journal of Business Management, Vol. 11 No. 1 pp. 139–45. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjbm.2017.39.45
12) Huang, S., & Hilary, G. (2018). Zombie Board: Board Tenure and Firm Performance. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 56 No. 4 pp. 1285–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12209
13) Marra, A., & Mazzola, P. (2014). Don’t Judge a Book by Its Cover: The Influence of Independent Directorss Busyness and Tenure on Earnings Quality. SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 23–24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2374002
14) Hsu, H.-H., & Wu, C. Y.-H. (2014). Board composition, grey directors and corporate failure in the UK. The British Accounting Review, Vol. 46 No. 3 pp. 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.12.002
15) Man, C. K., & Wong, B. (2013). Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: A Survey Of Literature. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), Vol 29 No. 2 pp. 391. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v29i2.7646
16) Farber, D. B. (2005). Restoring Trust after Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter? The Accounting Review, Vol. 80 No. 2 pp. 539–561. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.539
17) Chia, Y., Lapsley, I., & Lee, H. (2007). Choice of auditors and earnings management during the Asian financial crisis. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22 No. 2 pp. 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710718672
18) DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit Research after Sarbanes-Oxley. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 24 No.s-1 pp. 5–30. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2005.24.s-1.5
19) DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., & Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Audit Committee Effectiveness: A Synthesis of the Empirical Audit Committee Literature, Vol 21 No 38.
20) Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes. The Accounting Review, Vol. 79 No. 4 pp. 967–1010. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.967
21) McNichols, M. F. (2002). Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, Vol 77 No s-1 pp. 61-69. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61
22) Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors. The Accounting Review, Vol. 77 No. s-1 pp. 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
23) Hribar, P., & Craig Nichols, D. (2007). The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 45 No 5, pp. 1017-1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00259.x
24) DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 58 No 2-3 pp. 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
25) Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Wang, X. (2015). Does increased board independence reduce earnings management? Evidence from recent regulatory reforms. Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 20 No. 2 pp. 899–933.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-015-9316-0
26) Kim, K., & Yang, J. S. (2014). Director Tenure and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Korea. Review of Integrative Business and Economics, Vol. 3 No. 1 pp. 237–256. Retrieved from
http://www.sibresearch.org/uploads/2/7/9/9/2799227/riber_k14-129_237-256.pdf
27) Kim, K., Mauldin, E., & Patro, S. (2014). Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 57 No. 2-3 pp. 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.02.001
28) Ghosh, A., Marra, A., & Moon, D. (2010). Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Earnings Management: Pre- and Post-SOX Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 37 No. 9-10 pp. 1145–1176.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02218.x
29) Yang, J. S., & Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit Committees and Quarterly Earnings Management. International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 9 No. 3 pp. 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00278.x
30) Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Periods. The Accounting Review, Vol. 83 No. 3 pp. 757–787. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.757
31) Sun, J., Lan, G., & Ma, Z. (2014). Investment opportunity set, board independence, and firm performance. Managerial Finance, Vol. 40 No. 5 pp. 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-05-2013-0123
32) Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 37 No. 33 pp. 15–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.004
33) Jarque, C. M. (2011). Jarque-Bera Test. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pp. 701–702.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_319
34) Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education.
35) Heij, C., Franses, P. H., Kloek, T., & van Dijk, H. (2004). Econometric Methods with Applications in Business and Economics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
36) Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2007). Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? the Association between Audit Committee Directors’ Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism. SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.866884
37) Lobo, G. J., & Zhou, J. (2006). Did Conservatism in Financial Reporting Increase after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? Initial Evidence. Accounting Horizons, Vol. 20 No. 1 pp. 57–73. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.1.57
38) Vafeas, N. (2003). Length of Board Tenure and Outside Director Independence. Journal of Business Finance Accounting, 30(7–8), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.05525
39) Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The Audit Committee Oversight Process. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 26 No. 1 pp. 65–122. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.1.3
40) Bravo, F., & Reguera-Alvarado, N. (2017). Do independent director’s characteristics influence financial reporting quality? Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, Vol. 47 No. 1 pp. 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2017.1362200
41) Carcello, J. V., Hollingsworth, C. W., Klein, A., & Neal, T. L. (2006). Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Competing Corporate Governance Mechanisms, and Earnings Management. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.887512
42) Chan, A. M. Y., Liu, G., & Sun, J. (2012). Independent audit committee members’ board tenure and audit fees. Accounting & Finance, Vol. 53 No. 4 pp. 1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.2012.00490.x
43) Donoher, W. J., Reed, R., & Storrud-Barnes, S. F. (2007). Incentive Alignment, Control, and the Issue of Misleading Financial Disclosures. Journal of Management Vol 33 No 4 pp. 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302550
44) Kesner, I.F. (1988). Directors’ Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 66-84 https://doi.org/10.2307/256498
45) Li, N., & Wahid, A. S. (2017). Director Tenure Diversity and Board Monitoring Effectiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol 35 No 3 pp.1363–1394. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12332
46) SEC (2003). Disclosure Required by Sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8177.htm
47) Sharma, V. D., & Iselin, E. R. (2012). The Association between Audit Committee Multiple-Directorships, Tenure, and Financial Misstatements. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 31 No. 3 pp. 149–175.
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10290