Knowledge as a Source of Innovation for Entrepreneurial Firms
1Siti Aisah Janaji, 2Kamariah Ismail, 3Fahmi Ibrahim
1,2,3Universiti Teknologi Brunei
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i5-08ABSTRACT:
Knowledge is perceived as critical sources to non-technological and technological entrepreneurial firms in commercializing products and services. Knowledge-based view highlights that the diverse knowledge bases within firms reflect the firms’ performance. Gradually, the access to external and internal sources of knowledge can be transformed into stocks of knowledge thus, is embedded in such as organizational routines. Albeit the fact that entrepreneurial firms may have lack of financial capital, the exploration and exploitation of new and existing knowledge will enable firms to create value, and subsequently obtain competitive advantage as they grow. This paper will review how entrepreneurial firms can utilize knowledge for innovation.
KEYWORDS:
Innovation, Products, Services, Knowledge-based View, and Competitive Advantage,
REFERENCES:
1) Adner, R. & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,
24 (10), pp. 1011-1025.
2) Alonso, D. A. & Alexander, N. (2017). Importance of Acquiring Knowledge through Feedback in an Emerging Industry.
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(2), 265-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-07-2016-0128
3) Amankwah-Amoah, J. & Wang, X. (2019). Business failures around the world Emerging trends and new research
agenda. Journal of Business research, pp. 367-369
4) Antonelli, C. & Fassio, C. (2016). The role of external knowledge(s) in the introduction of product and process
innovations. R&D Management, 46, pp. 979-991.
5) Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and
innovative performance. Research Policy, 42 (1), pp. 117-127.
6) Bettis, R. A. & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal,
p. 5014.
7) Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. & Montobbio, F. (2005). The geography of knowledge spillovers: conceptual issues and
measurement problems. Networks and Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8) Brundrett, M. & Lungka, P. (2018). The Development of Teachers’ Knowledge and Behavior in Promoting Self-Discipline:
A Study of Early Years’ Teachers in Thailand. Education, 3-13, 47(4), 462–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2018.1498996.
9) Caloghirou, Y., Giotopoulos, L., Kontolaimou, A., Korra, E., & Tsakanikas, A. (2021). Industry-university knowledge flows
and product innovation: How do knowledge stocks and crisis matter?. Research Policy, 50 (3), 104195.
10) Chaanouni, A. & Yahira, I. B. (2014). Contribution of ERP to the Decision-Making Process through Knowledge
Management. Journal of Decision Systems, 23(3), 303-17.
11) Chatterjee, A., Pereira, A. & Sarkar, B. (2018). Learning Transfer System Inventory (LTSI) and Knowledge Creation in
Organisations. Learning Organisation, 25(5), 305-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-06-2016-0039
12) Chesbrough, H. W. & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50 (1),
pp. 57-76.
13) Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industry R&D.
Management Science, 48, pp. 1-23.
14) Covin, J. G. & Slevin, D. P. (1990). New venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: An industry analysis.
Journal of Business Venturing, 5, pp. 123-135.
15) Díaz-Díaz, N. & de Saá-Pérez, P. (2014). The interaction between external and internal knowledge sources: An open
innovation view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 43—446.
16) Feng, L. & Yu, X. (2018). A Study on the Integration Innovation Mode of China Railway High-Speed (CRH) Technology. In
2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET): 1–5. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23919/picmet.2018.8481875
17) Flor, M. L. & Cooper, S. Y. & Oltra, M. J. (2017). External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in
high-technology firms. European Management Journal, 36, pp. 1-12.
18) Gambetta, E. & Koka, B. R. & Hoskisson, R. E. (2019). Being too good for your own good: a stakeholder perspective on
the differential effect of firm-employee relationships on innovation search. Strategic Management Journal, 40 (1), pp.
108-126.
19) Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1), pp. 109-122.
20) Grant, R. M. & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management
Studies, 41(1), 0022-2380.
21) Grant, R. M. (2015). Knowledge-Based View. C.L. Cooper (Ed.), Wiley Encyclopedia of Management (third ed.). Strategic
Management, 12, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. DOI:10.1002/9781118785317.weom120172
22) González-Pernía, J. L., Parrilli, M. D. & Pena-Legazkue. (2015). STI-DUI learning modes, firm-university collaboration and
innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, pp. 475-492.
23) Goyal, S., Ahuja, M. & Kankanhalli, A. (2020). Does the source of external knowledge matter? Examining the role of
customer co-creation and partner sourcing in knowledge creation and innovation. Information & Management, 57,
103325.
24) Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B. & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and
Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper no. 8498.
25) Hameed, W. U, Nisar, Q. A. & Wu, H-C. (2020). Relationships between external knowledge, internal innovation, firms’
open innovation performance, service innovation and business performance in the Pakistani hotel industry.
International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2, 102745.
26) Hansen-Bauer, J. & Snow, C. C. (1996). Responding to hypercompetition: the structure and processes of a regional
learning network organization. Organization Science, 7 (4), pp. 413-427.
27) Katila, R. & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product
introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (6), pp. 1183-1194.
28) Kedmence, I. & Strašek, S. (2017). Are some cultures more favourable for social entrepreneurship than others?.
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30 (1), pp. 1461-1476.
29) Ko, Y. J. & Choi, J. N. (2019). Overtime work as antecedents of organizational satisfaction, firm innovation. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 40 (3), pp. 282-295.
30) Ko, Y. J., O’Neill, H. & Xie, X. (2021). Strategic intent as a contingency of the relationship between external knowledge
and firm innovation. Technovation, 102260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102260
31) Laureiro-Martínez, D., Brusoni, S. Canessa, N. & Zollo, M. (2015). Understanding the exploration-exploitation dilemma:
An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36 (3), pp. 319-
338.
32) Laursen, K. & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among
UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2).
33) Leal-Rodíguez, A. L. Roldán, J. L., Ariza-Montes, J. A., Leal-Millán, A. (2014). From potential absorptive capacity to
innovation outcome in project teams: the conditional mediating role of the realized absorptive capacity in a relational
learning context. International Journal of Project Management, 32 (6), pp. 894-907.
34) Lopez-Vega, H., Tell, F. Vanhaverbeke, W. (2016). Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation. Research
Policy, 45, pp. 125-136.
35) March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2 (1), pp. 71-87.
36) Martin, S. L. & Javalgi, R. R. G. (2019). Explaining performance determinants: A knowledge-based view of international
new ventures. Journal of Business Research, 191, pp. 615-626.
37) Matysiak, L., Rugman, A. M. & Bausch, A. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises: the dominant logics
behind sensing, seizing, and transforming matter. Management International Review, 58 (2), pp. 225-250.
38) Mithas, S. & Ramasubbu, N. & Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How information management capability influences firm
performance. MIS Quarterly, 35, p. 237.
39) Nagano, H. (2019). The growth of knowledge through resource-based view. Management Decision, 58 (1), pp. 98-111.
40) Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of
innovation. Oxford university press.
41) Okada, Y. & Nagaoka, S. (2020). Effects of early patent publication on knowledge dissemination: evidence from U.S.
patent law reform. Information Economics and Policy, 51, 100852.
42) O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma.
Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
43) Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The blinders of dominant logic. Long Range Planning, 37 (2), pp. 171-179.
44) Raffaelli, R., Glynn, M. A. & Tushman, M. (2019). Frame flexibility: the role of cognitive and emotional framing in
innovation adoption by incumbent firms, Strategic Management Journal, 40 (7), pp. 1013-1039.
45) Roper, S. & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2015). Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: evidence from matched
patents and innovation panel data. Research Policy, 44, pp. 1327-1340.
46) Sa, M. L. L., Choon-Yin, S., Chai, Y. K. & Joo, J. H. A. (2020). Knowledge creation process, customer orientation and firm
performance: Evidence from small hotels in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25 (2), 65-74.
47) Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., Bresciani, S. & Meissner, D. (2017). Knowledge-driven preferences in information inbound
open innovation modes. An explorative view on small to medium enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21
(3), pp. 640-655.
48) Singh, S., Akbani, I. & Dhir, S. (2020). Service innovation implementation: A systematic review and research agenda. The
Service Industries Journal, 40(7-8), pp. 491-517.
49) Spender, J. C. (1992). Strategy theorizing: Expanding the agenda. In P. Shrivastava, A. Huff and J. Dutton (eds.),
Advances in Strategic Management, 12A. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 3-32.
50) Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management
Journal, 18 (7), pp. 509-533.
51) Thomas, V. J., Bliemel, M., Shippam, C. & Maine, E. (2020). Endowing university spin-offs pre-formation:
Entrepreneurial capabilities for scientist-entrepreneurs. Technovation, 96-97, 102153.
52) Upadhyay, P. & Kumar, A. (2020). The intermediating role of organization and internal analytical knowledge between
the capability of big data analytics and a firm performance. International Journal of Information Management, 52,
102100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102100
53) von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32 (7), pp. 791-805.
54) West, J. & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation.
Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (4), pp. 814-831.
55) Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of
Management Review, 27 (2), 185-203.
56) Zhou, Y., Yuen, K. F., Tan, B., Thai, V. V. (201). The effect of maritime knowledge clusters on maritime firms’
performance: Am organizational learning perspective. Maritime Policy, 128, 104472.