Problems in the Re-classification of the Balance Sheet as Part of an Integrated Information System
Prof. Maria Silvia Avi
Full Professor in Business Administration Management Department- Ca’Foscari Venezia S. Giobbe – Cannaregio 873- 30121 Venezia (Italy)
ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0003-11164-4410
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i5-32
ABSTRACT:
The integrated information system is an IT and information structure that includes financial reporting and management control analysis. This system requires that each accounting item is linked to every other object. In the integrated information system, it is also necessary that each item has a unique meaning. Therefore, it is impossible to have several implications or several accounting items with special meanings.
The reclassification of the balance sheet in an integrated information system requires the adoption of an extraordinarily complete and exhaustive scheme. All this is indispensable for implementing a balance sheet/budget analysis that can be useful to company management for the implementation of a decision-making process that maximises management and decision-making efficiency and effectiveness.
The correct reclassification of all balance sheet and financial items sometimes requires reasoning that does not always appear linear and straightforward. For this reason, in the following pages, we will analyse the balance sheet items that, in general, are the precursors of reclassification errors that can invalidate the entire analysis of the balance sheet and the balance sheet budget.
REFERENCES:
1) Alexander D., A European true and fair view?(1993). European accounting review, vol 2, issue n. 1.
2) Alexander, D. and H. R. Schwencke and (1997). Accounting changes in Norway: a description and analysis of the transition
from a continental towards an anglo-saxon perspective on accounting. 20th Annual Congress of the European Accounting
Association. Graz, Austria.
3) Alexander, D. and H. R. Schwencke, (2003). Accounting change in Norway, European Accounting Review vol. 12, issue 3,
p. 549-566.
4) Alexander D., Jermakowicz E, (2006).A true and fair view of the principles/rules debate, Abacus, Vol. 42, n. 2.
5) Alexander, D., Nobes C. (2013). Financial accounting: an international introduction, Pearson.
6) Avi Maria Silvia (2019), Il sistema informativo integrato, Volume I, Analisi aziendali di natura economico-finanziaria: il
bilancio come strumento di gestione
7) Anda E. O., Puiga X. (2005). The Changing Relationship between Tax and Financial Reporting in Spain, Accounting in
Europe, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pages 195-207.
8) Ballwieser W., G. Bamberg, M.J. Beckmann, H. Bester, M. Blickle, R. Ewert, A. Wagenhofer and M. Gaynor (2012). Agency
theory, information, and incentives. Springer Science & Business Media.
9) Benston, G. J., M. Bromwich, R.E. Litan, and A. Wagenhofer, (2006). Worldwide financial reporting: The development and
future of accounting standards. Oxford University Press.
10) Burchell S., C. Clubb, A. Hopwood, J. Hughes, J. Nahapiet, (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society,
Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 5, issue 1, Pages 5-27.
11) Burchell S., C. Clubb A.G. Hopwood (1985). “Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the
United Kingdom”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 10, issue 4, pages 381-413.
12) Delvaille, P., Ebbers, G. and Saccon, C. (2005) International financial reporting convergence: evidence from three
continental European countries, Accounting in Europe, 2(1), pp. 137–164.14
13) De Franco G., S. P. Kothari and R.S..Verdi (2011). “The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability”, Journal of
Accounting Research, Vol. 49, pages 895–931.
14) Di Pietra R, McLeay S., Riccaboni A.,(2001) “Regulating Accounting Within the Political and Legal System“,Contemporary
Issues in Accounting Regulation, Chapter 3, Pages 59-78, Springer.
15) Ewert R., A. Wagenhofer (2005), Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management.
The Accounting Review vol. 80, Issue 4, pages 1101-1124.
16) Godfrey J.M., , Chalmers K., (2007) Globalisation of Accounting Standards, Edgar Elgar. European Journal of Economics,
Finance and Administrative Sciences Issue 101 (2019) 45
17) Graham J.R.,.Raedy J.S., .Shackelford D.A,” (2012) Research in accounting for income taxes”, Journal of Accounting and
Economics, vol. 53, issue 1- 2, pages 412-434.
18) Haller, A. Financial accounting developments in the European Union: past events and future prospects, (2002). European
Accounting Review vol 11 issue 1, pages 153-190.
19) Haller A, P. Walton and B. Raffournier B. (2003). International accounting. Cengage Learning EMEA.
20) Hopwood, A.G. (1972). “An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation”, Journal of
Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pages 156-182.
21) Hopwood, A. G. (1973). An accounting system and managerial behaviour. Lexington Books.
22) Hopwood, A.G. (1974). Leadership Climate and the Use of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation, The Accounting
Review, Vol. 49, No. 3, pages 485-495.
23) Hopwood, A. G. (1976). Accounting and human behavior. Prentice Hall.
24) Hopwood, A.(1987). “The archeology of accounting systems”, Accounting, organizations and society, vol. 12, issue 3,
pages 207-234.
25) Hopwood, A. G. and Peter Miller (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice. Vol. 24. Cambridge University
Press.
26) Hopwood, A.G., (1999). “Situating the practice of management accounting in its cultural context: an introduction”.
Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, Issue 5-6, pages 377-378.
27) Hopwood, A.G. (1983). “On trying to study accounting in the context in which operates”, Accounting, Organizations and
Society, Vol. 8, No. 213, pages. 287-305.
28) Hopwood, A. G., (1990). “Ambiguity, Knowledge and Territorial Claims: Some Observations on the Doctrine of Substance
Over Form”, British Accounting Review, Vol. I. pages 79-87.
29) Hopwood, A.G. (1990). “Accounting and the pursuit of efficiency”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol I,
pages 238-249.
30) Hopwood, A. G. (2000). “Understanding financial accounting practice”, Accounting, Organizations and Society Volume
25, Issue 8, pages 763–766.
31) Hopwood, A. G., (2007). Whither accounting research?, The Accounting Review vol. 82, issue 5, p. 1365–1374.
32) Hopwood, A. G., Chapman C. S., Shields M. D. (2007). Handbook of management accounting research. Volume 1, Elsevier.
33) Hopwood ,A. G., Chapman C. S., Shields M. D. (2007). Handbook of management accounting research. Volume 2, Elsevier.
34) Hopwood ,A.G., (2008). “Changing Pressures on the Research Process: On Trying to Research in an Age when Curiosity is
not Enough”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 17, Issue 1, pages 87-96.
35) Lamb M., Lymer A., Freedman J., James S., edited by (2005). Taxation, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Research, Oxford
University Press. 46 European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences Issue 101 (2019)
36) Lamb M., C. Nobes, A. Roberts (1998). International Variations in the Connections Between Tax and Financial Reporting,
Accounting and Business Research, vol. 28, Issue 3, pages 173-188.
37) Lewis A., Carrera S.,PhilipJones J.C., (2009), “Individual, cognitive and cultural differences in tax compliance: UK and Italy
compared”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 30, Issue 3, Pages 431-445
38) Kleven H. J., Kreiner C.T., Saez E., (2016)“Why Can Modern Governments Tax So Much? An Agency Model of Firms as
Fiscal Intermediaries”, Economica, Vol. 83, Issue 330, Pages 219–246
39) Mouritsen, J., K. Kreiner (2016). Accounting, decisions and promises”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol 49,
pages 21-31.
40) Nobes, C. W. (1979). Fiscal harmonization and European integration: comments, European Law Review, August
41) Nobes ,C.W., Aisbitt S. (2001). “The True and Fair Requirement in Recent National Implementations”, Vol. 31, No. 2, pages
83-90.
42) Nobes, C. and Schwencke, H. R. (2006) Modelling the links between tax and financial reporting: a longitudinal examination
of Norway over 30 years up to IFRS adoption, European Accounting Review, vol. 15, Issue 1, Pages. 63–87.
43) Nobes, C.W. and H.R. Schwencke (2006). Tax and financial reporting links: a longitudinal examination over 30 years up to
IFRS adoption, using Norway as a case study, European Accounting Review, vol. 15, issue 1, pp. 63-87.
44) Nobes, C. W., M. Gee and A. Haller (2010).‘The Influence of Tax on IFRS Consolidated Statements’, Australian Accounting
Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pages 97-122.
45) Nobes, C.W., (2013). “The continued survival of international differences under IFRS”, accounting and Business Research,
Vol.43, No.2, pages 83-111.
46) Nobes C. (2016). Towards an Assessment of Country Effects on IFRS Recognition Decisions and Measurement Estimations,
Paper, Venezia.
47) Nobes C. , Parker R., (2016), Comparative International Accounting, Pearson.
48) Aderlheide, D. (2001). Transnational Accounting, Macmillan, London.
49) Provasoli A., Mazzola P., Pozza L., (2007)“The role of National Standard Setters in the Standards Developing process: the
Italian experience”, in Godfrey J.M., , Chalmers K.,Globalisation of Accounting Standards, Edgar Elgar.
50) Schoen, W. (2004) International accounting standards – a ‘starting point’ for a common European taxbase? European
Taxation, vol 44, issue 10, Pages. 426–440.
51) Wagenhofer, A. (2003). “Accrual-based compensation, depreciation and investment decisions." European Accounting
Review, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pages 287-309
52) Wagenhoferb, A., Göxa R.F. (2009). “Optimal impairment rules”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 48, Issue 1,
pages 2–16.
53) Zambon, S. (2002) Locating Accounting in its National Context: The Case of Italy , Franco Angeli.
54) Zareh Asatryan, Z., C. Castellon, T. Stratmann (2016). Balanced Budget Rules and Fiscal Outcomes: Evidence from
Historical Constitutions, Centre for European Economic Research, Discussion Paper N. 16-034.